|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Nov 1, 2018 1:47:40 GMT
I'd like to add that Poland is actually a tough nut to fight in EW4, and I love their generals, I'd pick Dabrowski anytime, Sulkowski is a commander that took the good attributes from Murat and Dombrowski and becamse so good that he could train Dombrowski to have 5 stars [not recommended ofc lmao] Pointakowski is a very good general imo and he is a good hybrid with his geography and leadership combo as well as his Assault Art skill. He is shyed away from the stars to not make him so good. Koscuisko is a good city defender as he can give you profit from a city, upgrade things for a cheaper price and improve on their output and has the stars and skill to defend a point. The generals themselves can go on their own and could lead a front by their own and manage it. Sokolnicki is debatable but he could be decent at his job. Their skills are very good no doubt and many of the Coalition generals are no match for them. Most cavalry generals are inferior to the Polish ones. Their threat is Blucher and many Infantry generals. Archduke Charles is easily defeated by Dobrowski. The Russian onslaught can be highly weakened by the Polish forces, with the chance of defeating all of them russians throw at them. And this is speaking with no bias, The Polish conquest is very easy. They don't have nor need much of an economic output early on except to maybe put some units to defend their cities, the generals on their own do the job and if you add any of your own wether it be Sophia or anyone, you just steamroll the HRE, Prussians and defeat the Russian main force and the invasion of Russia is easy, The only thing that is difficult to peform is the invasion of Britian and to get to Portugal. But while I mentioned Portugal, the Spanish generals are a bit bad. I remember some Generals that can be buff health-wise, their Naval gen is pretty decent and does his job, I have not looked at his skills but he was pretty useful, and Diez as the only commander that has movement traine and that is it! There is also Joyes as I remember who is good at forts or is that Latour who is an Austrian general? Not sure but he is only good at forts and nothing more which is well nothing. And in the World Conqueror series you only have Franco who is well... yeah. But as I have heard, the Spanish generals are not that terrible in EW6? Two more generals that should be improved are the two romanian generals. I just looked over more of Antonescu’a documentary and it really seems like it was incredibly impressive to see what the two had accomplished. They should be on par with mannerheim imo. |
|
|
|
Post by Sun liren on Dec 9, 2018 11:12:45 GMT
In EW6 the Spanish and Portuguese generals are actually quite bad:
Spanish:
1.King Ferdinand VII:defence formation+battle array ain't that good, only assault is not going to help him much,well his is king rank boast his damage by a bit
2.torre:gate lite,good against cavalry, that's it
3.o dongju(sorry for spelling):ambush+jungle fighting+same infrantry ability as Clinton=trash
4.morilo:good naval general but he can't do much otherwise.
5.palafoxy: formation master + assault,good. Mountain fighting,not that bad. Stats tho, very bad but with aura buff he can be quite good
6.forjaz: even sir force prevost is better than him so....
7.belsford:explosive,bad. Salior, very bad. Land fort is the only thing that give him a little bit of damage.
So in conclusion,only palafoxy and morilo is okay, others are really trash while at least Spain and Portugal has some good general now
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Dec 9, 2018 15:59:04 GMT
In EW6 the Spanish and Portuguese generals are actually quite bad: Spanish: 1.King Ferdinand VII:defence formation+battle array ain't that good, only assault is not going to help him much,well his is king rank boast his damage by a bit 2.torre:gate lite,good against cavalry, that's it 3.o dongju(sorry for spelling):ambush+jungle fighting+same infrantry ability as Clinton=trash 4.morilo:good naval general but he can't do much otherwise. 5.palafoxy: formation master + assault,good. Mountain fighting,not that bad. Stats tho, very bad but with aura buff he can be quite good 6.forjaz: even sir force prevost is better than him so.... 7.belsford:explosive,bad. Salior, very bad. Land fort is the only thing that give him a little bit of damage. So in conclusion,only palafoxy and morilo is okay, others are really trash while at least Spain and Portugal has some good general now Well, the spanish and the portuguese were really the countries that were beat up during the napoleonic period. Spain lost most of its colonies wereas portugal lost brazil. But I agree. |
|
|
|
Post by Sun liren on Dec 10, 2018 0:00:45 GMT
Well at least some of them gets recognition.
Talking about recognition tho. Many of the Chinese general like zhangzizhong, xue yue, lizongren,duyuming,zhanglingfu and peng De huai do not gets its recognition.the only Chinese general in my wc4 team is sun and I wish more will come to my team in the next game
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Dec 10, 2018 0:31:32 GMT
Well at least some of them gets recognition. Talking about recognition tho. Many of the Chinese general like zhangzizhong, xue yue, lizongren,duyuming,zhanglingfu and peng De huai do not gets its recognition.the only Chinese general in my wc4 team is sun and I wish more will come to my team in the next game Zhang Z.Z is also a general easytech respects imo, and rightfully so. He has never been a bad or a weak general, in fact he was a Konev lite in both games. But I agree. Most of the japanese generals are also bad, with the exception of yamashita and yamamoto |
|
|
|
Post by Sun liren on Dec 10, 2018 1:15:37 GMT
Well I agree with you many Japanese general are quite bad. But I hope one day my dream team will have something like this:
Sunliren(wc4), itakgi(WC3)and huangbaidao(gog)-tank
Okamura (wc3), Yamashita (wc4),xueyue(wc3), zhanglingfu (wc3)-infrantry
Zhangzizhong (wc4) baichongxi(wc3)- artillery
Yamamoto (wc4)+chengshaoquan(wc3)-navy
Gaozhihang(gog)-air
Let's see if my dream can come true
|
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Dec 19, 2018 13:09:23 GMT
This reminds me, there hasn’t yet been an easytech game where vatutin was a bad general. However, his counterpart bock has yet to be good. Oof there's someone on this forum who feels very strongly against this, but luckily he sticks to wc3 and wc4 forums |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Dec 19, 2018 13:17:07 GMT
This reminds me, there hasn’t yet been an easytech game where vatutin was a bad general. However, his counterpart bock has yet to be good. Oof there's someone on this forum who feels very strongly against this, but luckily he sticks to wc3 and wc4 forums Our boi Bock? |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Dec 20, 2018 14:27:53 GMT
heh exactly dont quote his user tho xDDD
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeanne d'Arc on Jun 15, 2019 14:18:08 GMT
Bock is better in WC3 and WC4 than in GoG, so he HAS quality.
|
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jun 16, 2019 3:27:00 GMT
Bock is better in WC3 and WC4 than in GoG, so he HAS quality. , here someone has done you justice  |
|
|
|
Post by Fedor von Bock on Jun 22, 2019 19:34:26 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jun 23, 2019 1:59:51 GMT
Bock is better than Model tbh |
|
notfinnish
Major
I was once the youngest person on on Earth!
Posts: 168
|
Post by notfinnish on Jul 23, 2019 13:42:47 GMT
I feel like Easytech doesn't like Papagos. He has not been that good in the world conquerors and in GoG was kind of decent, but then his name was misspelled as Pappgoose
|
|
|
|
Post by K S Thimayya on Jul 23, 2019 14:08:30 GMT
I feel like Easytech doesn't like Papagos. He has not been that good in the world conquerors and in GoG was kind of decent, but then his name was misspelled as Pappgoose I didn't noticed that when I played GoG. However I can safely say that they don't like me as well  |
|
