|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 5, 2018 12:41:50 GMT
Possibly as a replacement for alexander. Currently, 3/8 of my gererals are useless in conquest as they can’t heal. Could I possibly replace Alexander with Joan of Arc, or is she too weak?
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Oct 5, 2018 17:05:03 GMT
Possibly as a replacement for alexander. Currently, 3/8 of my gererals are useless in conquest as they can’t heal. Could I possibly replace Alexander with Joan of Arc, or is she too weak? In early game when there's no good gens or your gens are weak, Joan is quite useful. Just remember that her usefulness ONLY lasts until Empire Age. After that, she can be replaced or her fellow gens can gain an advantage. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 5, 2018 18:58:37 GMT
Possibly as a replacement for alexander. Currently, 3/8 of my gererals are useless in conquest as they can’t heal. Could I possibly replace Alexander with Joan of Arc, or is she too weak? In early game when there's no good gens or your gens are weak, Joan is quite useful. Just remember that her usefulness ONLY lasts until Empire Age. After that, she can be replaced or her fellow gens can gain an advantage. Ouch. Right now I have caesar and moctezuma leading the other two teams. But I am interested in being able to grind the discovery age for resources. That makes sense. Her end game abilities are quite strong. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Oct 6, 2018 4:15:13 GMT
Possibly as a replacement for alexander. Currently, 3/8 of my gererals are useless in conquest as they can’t heal. Could I possibly replace Alexander with Joan of Arc, or is she too weak? In early game when there's no good gens or your gens are weak, Joan is quite useful. Just remember that her usefulness ONLY lasts until Empire Age. After that, she can be replaced or her fellow gens can gain an advantage. I do likr joan of arc and i also like alexander |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 6, 2018 13:20:10 GMT
In early game when there's no good gens or your gens are weak, Joan is quite useful. Just remember that her usefulness ONLY lasts until Empire Age. After that, she can be replaced or her fellow gens can gain an advantage. I do likr joan of arc and i also like alexander Alexander is quite good imo. But he is very expensive, his debuff is spy which is meh imo (I can see how this would be good for alexander’s build around destroying fortresses), and he can’t heal. Joan of arc’s cheap cost, cure expert, and lvl 6 abilities could make her very useful. As I prefer Barbarossa to Alexander, his commander skill could more or less make up for Joan’s meh output. The main issue is not in Alexander’s, Khan’s, and Barbarossa’s lack in skill. Its more of the fact that they can’t heal. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Oct 6, 2018 14:50:19 GMT
I do likr joan of arc and i also like alexander Alexander is quite good imo. But he is very expensive, his debuff is spy which is meh imo (I can see how this would be good for alexander’s build around destroying fortresses), and he can’t heal. Joan of arc’s cheap cost, cure expert, and lvl 6 abilities could make her very useful. As I prefer Barbarossa to Alexander, his commander skill could more or less make up for Joan’s meh output. The main issue is not in Alexander’s, Khan’s, and Barbarossa’s lack in skill. Its more of the fact that they can’t heal. Alexander is free. He has a very good skill aka Attack Master |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 6, 2018 16:00:11 GMT
Alexander is quite good imo. But he is very expensive, his debuff is spy which is meh imo (I can see how this would be good for alexander’s build around destroying fortresses), and he can’t heal. Joan of arc’s cheap cost, cure expert, and lvl 6 abilities could make her very useful. As I prefer Barbarossa to Alexander, his commander skill could more or less make up for Joan’s meh output. The main issue is not in Alexander’s, Khan’s, and Barbarossa’s lack in skill. Its more of the fact that they can’t heal. Alexander is free. He has a very good skill aka Attack Master Your right. He has good skills at lvl 6: spy, attack master, phalanx, fury. He is just quite expensive to upgrade. I prefer barbarossa who has marshal, infantry commander, leadership, and fury. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Oct 7, 2018 14:57:24 GMT
Alexander is free. He has a very good skill aka Attack Master Your right. He has good skills at lvl 6: spy, attack master, phalanx, fury. He is just quite expensive to upgrade. I prefer barbarossa who has marshal, infantry commander, leadership, and fury. But alexander is very easy to get and mine has 226 attack and he is very good in hoplite. I cant get barbarossa yet since im at medieval age but im on the first campaign in medieval age. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 7, 2018 22:55:48 GMT
Your right. He has good skills at lvl 6: spy, attack master, phalanx, fury. He is just quite expensive to upgrade. I prefer barbarossa who has marshal, infantry commander, leadership, and fury. But alexander is very easy to get and mine has 226 attack and he is very good in hoplite. I cant get barbarossa yet since im at medieval age but im on the first campaign in medieval age. -Oh I see. You are very early in that game. In that case, I learned that Moctezuma was an amazing general as well. If you are very early in the game, I wouldn't advise getting barbarossa yet. I would just stick the lucky crown on Alexander. Maybe get Nobunaga. I am almost at gunpowder age, and I already have 2-3 teams of generals to handle a front in conquest, I was just looking for a 4th one who could be useful. My teams are as following: Team 1 -Moctezuma -Napoleon -(Washington, depending on the conquest age) Team 2 -Caesar -Nobunaga Team 3 -Washington Team 4 -Genghis Khan -Alexander -Barbarossa The reason for me making this threat is because team 4 is lacking the ability to heal, so their usefulness in conquest is very limited. I was thinking of adding joan of arc on this team as a replacement for Alexander in order to make this team work out. I agree, Alexander is invaluable early game. But it costs 750 medals to promote him to discovery age, and all of his skills are very expensive to upgrade. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Oct 8, 2018 3:37:41 GMT
But alexander is very easy to get and mine has 226 attack and he is very good in hoplite. I cant get barbarossa yet since im at medieval age but im on the first campaign in medieval age. -Oh I see. You are very early in that game. In that case, I learned that Moctezuma was an amazing general as well. If you are very early in the game, I wouldn't advise getting barbarossa yet. I would just stick the lucky crown on Alexander. Maybe get Nobunaga. I am almost at gunpowder age, and I already have 2-3 teams of generals to handle a front in conquest, I was just looking for a 4th one who could be useful. My teams are as following: Team 1 -Moctezuma -Napoleon -(Washington, depending on the conquest age) Team 2 -Caesar -Nobunaga Team 3 -Washington Team 4 -Genghis Khan -Alexander -Barbarossa The reason for me making this threat is because team 4 is lacking the ability to heal, so their usefulness in conquest is very limited. I was thinking of adding joan of arc on this team as a replacement for Alexander in order to make this team work out. I agree, Alexander is invaluable early game. But it costs 750 medals to promote him to discovery age, and all of his skills are very expensive to upgrade. I got belisarius too and he still helps but i just wish i got moctezuma though he is expensive. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 8, 2018 4:27:12 GMT
-Oh I see. You are very early in that game. In that case, I learned that Moctezuma was an amazing general as well. If you are very early in the game, I wouldn't advise getting barbarossa yet. I would just stick the lucky crown on Alexander. Maybe get Nobunaga. I am almost at gunpowder age, and I already have 2-3 teams of generals to handle a front in conquest, I was just looking for a 4th one who could be useful. My teams are as following: Team 1 -Moctezuma -Napoleon -(Washington, depending on the conquest age) Team 2 -Caesar -Nobunaga Team 3 -Washington Team 4 -Genghis Khan -Alexander -Barbarossa The reason for me making this threat is because team 4 is lacking the ability to heal, so their usefulness in conquest is very limited. I was thinking of adding joan of arc on this team as a replacement for Alexander in order to make this team work out. I agree, Alexander is invaluable early game. But it costs 750 medals to promote him to discovery age, and all of his skills are very expensive to upgrade. I got belisarius too and he still helps but i just wish i got moctezuma though he is expensive. Nice. Belisarious ain’t bad. The reason why Moctezuma is good is “cure master” and “leadership.” His damage isn’t massive, but he is amazing in conquest, amazing in campaign, and invaluable in city attacks. But my main tip is to make sure you get Nobunaga as your first expensive general. I had to restart when I bought Li Shimin instead of him. He is just that good. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Oct 8, 2018 14:14:15 GMT
I got belisarius too and he still helps but i just wish i got moctezuma though he is expensive. Nice. Belisarious ain’t bad. The reason why Moctezuma is good is “cure master” and “leadership.” His damage isn’t massive, but he is amazing in conquest, amazing in campaign, and invaluable in city attacks. But my main tip is to make sure you get Nobunaga as your first expensive general. I had to restart when I bought Li Shimin instead of him. He is just that good. Where can you get nobunaga and at what age? |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 8, 2018 16:56:38 GMT
Nice. Belisarious ain’t bad. The reason why Moctezuma is good is “cure master” and “leadership.” His damage isn’t massive, but he is amazing in conquest, amazing in campaign, and invaluable in city attacks. But my main tip is to make sure you get Nobunaga as your first expensive general. I had to restart when I bought Li Shimin instead of him. He is just that good. Where can you get nobunaga and at what age? Empire Age, costs 2300 medals |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Oct 9, 2018 2:04:29 GMT
Where can you get nobunaga and at what age? Empire Age, costs 2300 medals I just restarted the game since i saw some mistakes i made so im gonna get moctezuma first. Im at lvl 8 |
|
|
|
Post by generalshadow on Oct 9, 2018 3:42:01 GMT
But alexander is very easy to get and mine has 226 attack and he is very good in hoplite. I cant get barbarossa yet since im at medieval age but im on the first campaign in medieval age. -Oh I see. You are very early in that game. In that case, I learned that Moctezuma was an amazing general as well. If you are very early in the game, I wouldn't advise getting barbarossa yet. I would just stick the lucky crown on Alexander. Maybe get Nobunaga. I am almost at gunpowder age, and I already have 2-3 teams of generals to handle a front in conquest, I was just looking for a 4th one who could be useful. My teams are as following: Team 1 -Moctezuma -Napoleon -(Washington, depending on the conquest age) Team 2 -Caesar -Nobunaga Team 3 -Washington Team 4 -Genghis Khan -Alexander -Barbarossa The reason for me making this threat is because team 4 is lacking the ability to heal, so their usefulness in conquest is very limited. I was thinking of adding joan of arc on this team as a replacement for Alexander in order to make this team work out. I agree, Alexander is invaluable early game. But it costs 750 medals to promote him to discovery age, and all of his skills are very expensive to upgrade. Tbh u dont really even need that many gens in conquest but anyways i would recomend this: montr doesnt need a healing item as he has his own cure master and with help of napoleon he wont need additional healing (idk if im correct but i remember u had paladin set on him) then give nobunaga 1 healing item and alexander 1 asswell and swith places of alex and caesar(i mean if caesar has cure master on high level) and khan has bravness so u wont need anything on him and about barbarossa he wont need anything if caesar will be on his side healing him(but theres a big probability of losing barb as he has no surviving ability at all but what u can do is when u lose barbarossa and u get victory or get defeated u can simply close the game from task manager or whatever thats called and then go to ew 5 click conquest and it will give u other ending results and u can do it as much as u want and get different results) idk how good i explained that last part but hopefully it helped |
|
