|
Post by silvercreek on May 31, 2019 1:50:48 GMT
This my team after a year,in case anyone is interested. Comments are welcome. Who do you have on page 2? I am still working on skill upgrades. I would like to get karl, blucher, and murat up to marshal eventually. Just Jourdan on page2,I keep around for a slot filler on daily challenges. Yes,those guys you got will only get better with upgrades,I would up their master skills first though.
|
|
|
Post by vorlian on May 31, 2019 14:25:03 GMT
Yeah massena is only at lvl 2 all the rest of the aur guys are at 5 already. After the aura skill, i will do terrain then assult or the cav one. Max out blucher and go from there
|
|
|
Post by cojoncio on May 31, 2019 17:02:50 GMT
My team:
Murat, Davout, Lan Massena, Karl Sophia, Scharny Sakurako
|
|
|
Post by vorlian on May 31, 2019 17:30:46 GMT
My team: Murat, Davout, Lan Massena, Karl Sophia, Scharny Sakurako I love davout. A possible switch from lan to dabrowski? Maybe? Maybe not? I am not sure the artillery generals are optimal. Never used scharnhorst. I typically use only alex i in some conquests. Sometimes also john. Depends on how involved in naval warfare i become. Inf is good. I use the drum and an amb on massena and the rifle and a tent on karl. Massena gets a crit medal with davout.
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Jun 1, 2019 0:45:23 GMT
My team: Murat, Davout, Lan Massena, Karl Sophia, Scharny Sakurako Good solid team. Interesting you have no aura artillery generals,though. I used Sophia for a long time,and found her very good at city busting,but also very useful in the palace, so retired her. Scharnhorst I also considered,got John on discount and since I have Napoleon, my artillery team was done.
|
|
|
Post by vorlian on Jun 1, 2019 17:43:37 GMT
I am considering only one artillary general. If there was only one on a team, who would it be? I have Alexander I and John.
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Jun 1, 2019 17:55:10 GMT
I am considering only one artillary general. If there was only one on a team, who would it be? I have Alexander I and John. If only one,it would have to be John(if not iap Napoleon) This because John has terrain skills unmatched by any other,but having 2 is much better since you can siege cities,therefore let your cavalry in and infrantry to hold them,if need be. So you should keep both for meantime.
|
|
|
Post by vorlian on Jun 3, 2019 0:49:33 GMT
The cavalry have a pretty easy time taking cities. And i have noticed that massena + barclay = city destroying. Put karl next to them and thier tunneling ability really shines. I find that i hardly use artillery. Should i work it in, or are they not really worth it? I feel like Alexander I and some light art spam would be just as effective. I will play more and see. Maybe they can lead a line them selves with a few line infantry.
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jun 3, 2019 2:59:50 GMT
The cavalry have a pretty easy time taking cities. And i have noticed that massena + barclay = city destroying. Put karl next to them and thier tunneling ability really shines. I find that i hardly use artillery. Should i work it in, or are they not really worth it? I feel like Alexander I and some light art spam would be just as effective. I will play more and see. Maybe they can lead a line them selves with a few line infantry. To have a balanced team has one great advantage. At the beginning of many conquests and missions there are different types of units at your disposal, but limited resources. So if your team is balanced you can fight right away instead of guessing how to hire units of a special type for your generals.
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jun 3, 2019 4:57:45 GMT
The cavalry have a pretty easy time taking cities. And i have noticed that massena + barclay = city destroying. Put karl next to them and thier tunneling ability really shines. I find that i hardly use artillery. Should i work it in, or are they not really worth it? I feel like Alexander I and some light art spam would be just as effective. I will play more and see. Maybe they can lead a line them selves with a few line infantry. Arty is the worst unit after navy but like stoic said in some campaigns is your only usefull unit a rocket artillery then is pretty good, but I wouldn't advies to spam ary in conquests only in a few situations is that a good idea
|
|
|
Post by vorlian on Jun 3, 2019 18:22:05 GMT
Yeah. It didnt quite work....the more i play the less i want 2 ary generals. I would rather have a situatuonal player like lannes who could hold a line for a turn or two, or capture a city and such. I am happy with 3 cav generals any more (i used to have 4) and some dont get used. More thought must go into this before i sell back John.
|
|
|
Post by vorlian on Jun 3, 2019 18:58:34 GMT
And there is always jordan. I know i know. But.... for free he might be a good alternative to John.
|
|
rautio
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 7
|
Post by rautio on Jun 21, 2019 11:17:53 GMT
Mine are: Inf: Karl,Messena and Barclay Cav, Murat and Bulcher Arty: Napoleon and Muhmad Navy Nelson.
I have wondered if Dąbrowski is better than Bulcher but he is maxed out
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jun 21, 2019 11:45:27 GMT
Mine are: Inf: Karl,Messena and Barclay Cav, Murat and Bulcher Arty: Napoleon and Muhmad Navy Nelson. I have wondered if Dąbrowski is better than Bulcher but he is maxed out No blucher is the best gen in the game while dabro isn't even better then murat
|
|
rautio
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 7
|
Post by rautio on Jun 21, 2019 12:51:56 GMT
I will stick with my team then thanks
|
|