|
|
Post by Will on Jan 5, 2019 1:55:10 GMT
jamesyang , I was thinking is there a possibility you can add a conquest start date where it’s during the time of the lone star state I would love to play as Texas
|
|
|
|
Post by jamesyang on Jan 5, 2019 2:48:59 GMT
Now , we are busy on our new games . They are different from the previous games we released before . Please wair patiently . : )
|
|
|
|
Post by Cyrus the Great on Jan 5, 2019 4:54:54 GMT
Oh boy can't wait to see it!
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jan 5, 2019 16:25:45 GMT
Now , we are busy on our new games . They are different from the previous games we released before . Please wair patiently . : ) Dear James, we wish you luck with the new projects, and you have our wholehearted support. We are all excited and wait patiently for these games. But let me suggest that in your new games there will be more strong generals than it was the case in WC4 and EW6. So far the difference between top 10-12 generals and the rest is so obvious that nobody will even consider to hire other generals than these 10 persons. In the end almost all players have teams of twins with the same faces. Make more equally strong generals in your new games (with different skills, so that the players could really make a choice), make more IAP generals, don't invest to much time in creating generals who have no future and who immediately after release of the game are labelled as "weak" and "trash" generals. Let our choice be difficult  , so that the path taken by each player could be unique and interesting and even unpredictable. Good luck! |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jan 5, 2019 16:43:07 GMT
Now , we are busy on our new games . They are different from the previous games we released before . Please wair patiently . : ) Dear James, we wish you luck with the new projects, and you have our wholehearted support. We are all excited and wait patiently for these games. But let me suggest that in your new games there will be more strong generals than it was the case in WC4 and EW6. So far the difference between top 10-12 generals and the rest is so obvious that nobody will even consider to hire other generals than these 10 persons. In the end almost all players have teams of twins with the same faces. Make more equally strong generals in your new games (with different skills, so that the players could really make a choice), make more IAP generals, don't invest to much time in creating generals who have no future and who immediately after release of the game are labelled as "weak" and "trash" generals. Let our choice be difficult , so that the path taken by each player could be unique and interesting. Good luck! I think that hybrids should also see a return. No I am not talking about Robert in EW6, I am talking about generals like Davout, Nelson, or Lannes from EW4 making a comeback in the next game. It is lots of fun to play with generals of many talents. I did like much of the new concepts introduced by ew6, such as better allies, countries joining in late, and who could forget, the awesome military tactics which would allow you to move a general 20 hexes while in water.. |
|
|
|
Post by Cyrus the Great on Jan 5, 2019 16:55:44 GMT
Now , we are busy on our new games . They are different from the previous games we released before . Please wair patiently . : ) Dear James, we wish you luck with the new projects, and you have our wholehearted support. We are all excited and wait patiently for these games. But let me suggest that in your new games there will be more strong generals than it was the case in WC4 and EW6. So far the difference between top 10-12 generals and the rest is so obvious that nobody will even consider to hire other generals than these 10 persons. In the end almost all players have teams of twins with the same faces. Make more equally strong generals in your new games (with different skills, so that the players could really make a choice), make more IAP generals, don't invest to much time in creating generals who have no future and who immediately after release of the game are labelled as "weak" and "trash" generals. Let our choice be difficult , so that the path taken by each player could be unique and interesting and even unpredictable. Good luck! In WC3 and EW4 it's a big problem. Only 5% of generals are actually good. But in EW5 it got fixed with the whole ages thing and in EW6 it got fixed by removing the star system. I like picking EW6 generals since it's like a whole different system then wc (except for the skills and rank that's same) Speaking of gens, I have 1230 medals and my Massena has all level 3 skills (except for lvl 5 aura) and idk who to get for next general. I'm planning in another inf general or an arty guy. Who should I get? Should I go for cav? I think cheaper guys would be nice, less grinding. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jan 5, 2019 17:25:31 GMT
Dear James, we wish you luck with the new projects, and you have our wholehearted support. We are all excited and wait patiently for these games. But let me suggest that in your new games there will be more strong generals than it was the case in WC4 and EW6. So far the difference between top 10-12 generals and the rest is so obvious that nobody will even consider to hire other generals than these 10 persons. In the end almost all players have teams of twins with the same faces. Make more equally strong generals in your new games (with different skills, so that the players could really make a choice), make more IAP generals, don't invest to much time in creating generals who have no future and who immediately after release of the game are labelled as "weak" and "trash" generals. Let our choice be difficult , so that the path taken by each player could be unique and interesting and even unpredictable. Good luck! In WC3 and EW4 it's a big problem. Only 5% of generals are actually good. But in EW5 it got fixed with the whole ages thing and in EW6 it got fixed by removing the star system. I like picking EW6 generals since it's like a whole different system then wc (except for the skills and rank that's same) Speaking of gens, I have 1230 medals and my Massena has all level 3 skills (except for lvl 5 aura) and idk who to get for next general. I'm planning in another inf general or an arty guy. Who should I get? Should I go for cav? I think cheaper guys would be nice, less grinding. I would say Barclay de Tolly... 1. He is quite cheap. 2. He has same skills as Massena (with one exception). 3. He has "Inf. Master" skill - the best kind of skills in the game. I think Massena, Barclay and Ney are excellent first options for every new player, and all of them definitely are capable of being members of the endgame team. Ney can be replaced by Lan, though... |
|
|
|
Post by unagok on Jan 5, 2019 19:09:57 GMT
Now , we are busy on our new games . They are different from the previous games we released before . Please wair patiently . : ) I think something along the lines of a ‘Weekly Challenge’ mission with a reward twice or three times the amount of one-star conquest rewards can be implemented very easily and would improve the replayability greatly. There can even be a function for the player to choose the difficulty each week, adjusting rewards accordingly. Just saying, this will probably take less than 1 hour each week to implement. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jan 5, 2019 21:30:09 GMT
Dear James, we wish you luck with the new projects, and you have our wholehearted support. We are all excited and wait patiently for these games. But let me suggest that in your new games there will be more strong generals than it was the case in WC4 and EW6. So far the difference between top 10-12 generals and the rest is so obvious that nobody will even consider to hire other generals than these 10 persons. In the end almost all players have teams of twins with the same faces. Make more equally strong generals in your new games (with different skills, so that the players could really make a choice), make more IAP generals, don't invest to much time in creating generals who have no future and who immediately after release of the game are labelled as "weak" and "trash" generals. Let our choice be difficult , so that the path taken by each player could be unique and interesting and even unpredictable. Good luck! In WC3 and EW4 it's a big problem. Only 5% of generals are actually good. But in EW5 it got fixed with the whole ages thing and in EW6 it got fixed by removing the star system. I like picking EW6 generals since it's like a whole different system then wc (except for the skills and rank that's same) Speaking of gens, I have 1230 medals and my Massena has all level 3 skills (except for lvl 5 aura) and idk who to get for next general. I'm planning in another inf general or an arty guy. Who should I get? Should I go for cav? I think cheaper guys would be nice, less grinding. I highly recommend murat. Really I think that he and massena alone can carry you really far into the game as well as at being able to complete the first two conquest scenarios at a reasonably fast rate (you can definitely do it without using generals though). Barclay is also a great general to keep. He is a massena lite. I personally got Karl instead of him as Karl is quite strong. |
|
|
|
Post by jamesyang on Jan 7, 2019 6:02:36 GMT
Dear player: Thank you for playing our games. The suggestions you made could be very helpful. We will discuss on their feasibility. |
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Jan 7, 2019 6:22:43 GMT
Dear James, we wish you luck with the new projects, and you have our wholehearted support. We are all excited and wait patiently for these games. But let me suggest that in your new games there will be more strong generals than it was the case in WC4 and EW6. So far the difference between top 10-12 generals and the rest is so obvious that nobody will even consider to hire other generals than these 10 persons. In the end almost all players have teams of twins with the same faces. Make more equally strong generals in your new games (with different skills, so that the players could really make a choice), make more IAP generals, don't invest to much time in creating generals who have no future and who immediately after release of the game are labelled as "weak" and "trash" generals. Let our choice be difficult , so that the path taken by each player could be unique and interesting. Good luck! I think that hybrids should also see a return. No I am not talking about Robert in EW6, I am talking about generals like Davout, Nelson, or Lannes from EW4 making a comeback in the next game. It is lots of fun to play with generals of many talents. I did like much of the new concepts introduced by ew6, such as better allies, countries joining in late, and who could forget, the awesome military tactics which would allow you to move a general 20 hexes while in water.. Now you know what seem trash to you is different to a new player. Waiting for Murat(who cost alot)for example when Greene who is good half the price and will serve well. Besides having any general be he "weak" to your standards, is better than none at all. This is what is unique now, many paths one can go with starting generals of many kinds of skills,not always the best has to be the only path. And one can sell them off (losing a few medals)once thier purpose has been served. |
|
|
|
Post by Cyrus the Great on Jan 8, 2019 16:14:45 GMT
Thanks both of you been busy lately  |
|
|
|
Post by Cyrus the Great on Jan 9, 2019 22:21:59 GMT
One of the things fixed in EW6 is that gens now have desired skills. But now hybrids are long gone, but I think it's better then hybrids, since now generals actually have skills that make sense on them. Like in WC3 and EW4 there could be a naval general with desert fighting or a inf general with some random tank skill, or a cavalry general with mass fire (inf skill).
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jan 9, 2019 23:07:55 GMT
One of the things fixed in EW6 is that gens now have desired skills. But now hybrids are long gone, but I think it's better then hybrids, since now generals actually have skills that make sense on them. Like in WC3 and EW4 there could be a naval general with desert fighting or a inf general with some random tank skill, or a cavalry general with mass fire (inf skill). Definitely true. Mountbatten from wc3 comes to mind. Industrial expert? Jungle fighting? On a naval general. Bah |
|
, so that the path taken by each player could be unique and interesting and even unpredictable. Good luck!
