|
|
Post by stoic on Feb 20, 2019 13:44:31 GMT
In actual fact such approach is of great importance late in the game. Minor details can change the situation drastically and win the day in the end!
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2019 13:57:07 GMT
razvan94 , the 5 art gens you have are basically the best 5 after Napoleon, unless you think Maria is better than Jourdan but Jourdan is still good. Which art general do you like the most, if you have any opinions on them? Well my core team of art generals would be: Mahmud II, Alexander and John. Sophia is great but her princess bonus is also very helpful in Siege, I bought her before tried Siege so I did not want to sell her and farm for another general, and she has great skill for a princess.I think people usually dont like art generals because they dont use them properly, for example     Here John can deal a lot of dmg to Nicholas as he has an armored unit and John hits 120% to that, on the same unit, Kart with the machine gun would hit 75%. On the other had, John would hit 75% on Sophia cuz she is on a heavy armored unit and Karl would hit 125%, so taking that in consideration, you have to be very precise with your movent, to have Karl at the best moment so he can DD on Sophia but for that you need to push the fort with John Alexander Mahmud and our Sophia. As for Jourdan, well I like him better than Maria not because his skills, just because he is free, so when I needed to change him for another general I could and then get him back for free, an example for that is the mission where you cant use art generals. Sorry for my bad english, doing my best to make myself understood. Artillery hurts, but cavalry and infantry are more reliable. But after having Mahmud and ALexander, and trying them out in conquest, i gotta say, artillery are actually really strong. Just have to position well and path your units well. |
|
|
|
Post by Clausewitz on Feb 20, 2019 14:00:19 GMT
razvan94 , the 5 art gens you have are basically the best 5 after Napoleon, unless you think Maria is better than Jourdan but Jourdan is still good. Which art general do you like the most, if you have any opinions on them? Well my core team of art generals would be: Mahmud II, Alexander and John. Sophia is great but her princess bonus is also very helpful in Siege, I bought her before tried Siege so I did not want to sell her and farm for another general, and she has great skill for a princess.I think people usually dont like art generals because they dont use them properly, for example Here John can deal a lot of dmg to Nicholas as he has an armored unit and John hits 120% to that, on the same unit, Kart with the machine gun would hit 75%. On the other had, John would hit 75% on Sophia cuz she is on a heavy armored unit and Karl would hit 125%, so taking that in consideration, you have to be very precise with your movent, to have Karl at the best moment so he can DD on Sophia but for that you need to push the fort with John Alexander Mahmud and our Sophia. As for Jourdan, well I like him better than Maria not because his skills, just because he is free, so when I needed to change him for another general I could and then get him back for free, an example for that is the mission where you cant use art generals. Sorry for my bad english, doing my best to make myself understood. Nicholas I ? That guy is Johann David Ludwig Graf Yorck von Wartenburg. Thats strange. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2019 14:02:10 GMT
In actual fact such approach is of great importance late in the game. Minor details can change the situation drastically and win the day in the end! That minor detail cost me 2 turns in my conquest low turn count run   |
|
|
|
Post by razvan94 on Feb 20, 2019 14:16:12 GMT
Well my core team of art generals would be: Mahmud II, Alexander and John. Sophia is great but her princess bonus is also very helpful in Siege, I bought her before tried Siege so I did not want to sell her and farm for another general, and she has great skill for a princess.I think people usually dont like art generals because they dont use them properly, for example Here John can deal a lot of dmg to Nicholas as he has an armored unit and John hits 120% to that, on the same unit, Kart with the machine gun would hit 75%. On the other had, John would hit 75% on Sophia cuz she is on a heavy armored unit and Karl would hit 125%, so taking that in consideration, you have to be very precise with your movent, to have Karl at the best moment so he can DD on Sophia but for that you need to push the fort with John Alexander Mahmud and our Sophia. As for Jourdan, well I like him better than Maria not because his skills, just because he is free, so when I needed to change him for another general I could and then get him back for free, an example for that is the mission where you cant use art generals. Sorry for my bad english, doing my best to make myself understood. Nicholas I ? That guy is Johann David Ludwig Graf Yorck von Wartenburg. Thats strange. Well I just searched what you said and did not expect that :   |
|
|
|
Post by Clausewitz on Feb 20, 2019 14:22:02 GMT
Nicholas I ? That guy is Johann David Ludwig Graf Yorck von Wartenburg. Thats strange. Well I just searched what you said and did not expect that : in ew4 they did a similar mistake. There were two fersion of muhammad ali pasha. But to confuse the Russian tsar with a prussian field Marshall is quite strange. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Feb 20, 2019 15:50:58 GMT
Actually it is not an unintentional mistake. They simply "borrowed" some pictures for a "Crimean war" campaign. Not the best solution, of course, but I can't really blame them. As someone said: "Nicholas is Yorck on steroids"  As I remember the picture of Oudinot was placed instead of Nachimov's portrait and so on... |
|
|
|
Post by Clausewitz on Feb 20, 2019 16:36:43 GMT
Actually it is not an unintentional mistake. They simply "borrowed" some pictures for a "Crimean war" campaign. Not the best solution, of course, but I can't really blame them. As someone said: "Nicholas is Yorck on steroids" As I remember the picture of Oudinot was placed instead of Nachimov's portrait and so on... Oh okay didn't know that. For me personally it's all about the details. Sure Yorck wasn't the most famous general of that time period but he was a important figure of our history (what if the prussians under Wilhelm III continue to stay neutral after the Convention of tauroggen). Why did the prussians always get shafted? |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Feb 20, 2019 17:34:42 GMT
Actually it is not an unintentional mistake. They simply "borrowed" some pictures for a "Crimean war" campaign. Not the best solution, of course, but I can't really blame them. As someone said: "Nicholas is Yorck on steroids" As I remember the picture of Oudinot was placed instead of Nachimov's portrait and so on... Oh okay didn't know that. For me personally it's all about the details. Sure Yorck wasn't the most famous general of that time period but he was a important figure of our history (what if the prussians under Wilhelm III continue to stay neutral after the Convention of tauroggen). Why did the prussians always get shafted? If someone has reasons to be displeased it is Tsar Nicholas, to say the least. It was his portrait that was "forged" after all. And as I said Oudinot was presented as Nachimov - French marshal instead of Russian admiral. I think it was a "universal mistreatment". Finden Sie nicht?  |
|
|
|
Post by Clausewitz on Feb 20, 2019 17:44:07 GMT
Oh okay didn't know that. For me personally it's all about the details. Sure Yorck wasn't the most famous general of that time period but he was a important figure of our history (what if the prussians under Wilhelm III continue to stay neutral after the Convention of tauroggen). Why did the prussians always get shafted? If someone has reasons to be displeased it is Tsar Nicholas, to say the least. It was his portrait that was "forged" after all. And as I said Oudinot was presented as Nachimov - French marshal instead of Russian admiral. I think it was a "universal mistreatment". Finden Sie nicht? yes I agree. Ja mein Freund. |
|
|
|
Post by Sun liren on Feb 24, 2019 9:39:40 GMT
Come on guys at least yorck get it's duplicate in late game. What about our dear sir Isaac Brock where he is duplicated through out the hold game sad Brock:(
|
|
As I remember the picture of Oudinot was placed instead of Nachimov's portrait and so on...
