|
|
Post by The Last Stand Soldier on Dec 4, 2015 20:38:22 GMT
Your choice!
|
|
|
|
Post by Moreau on Dec 4, 2015 21:27:25 GMT
Ww1 because of the life condtions in the trenches
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 5, 2015 8:42:54 GMT
WW1 because without it WW2 would have never happend
|
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Dec 5, 2015 9:27:57 GMT
Ww2 more people died in that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Dec 5, 2015 15:44:10 GMT
WW1, trenchwarfare is brain numbing.
In WW2, you at least had some movement in it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 5, 2015 16:55:41 GMT
WW1, trenchwarfare is brain numbing. In WW2, you at least had some movement in it. WW1 had movement too. The war in the colonies, invading Russia in 1917/1918, the German U-Boats. But yeah the most fighting was in the trenches. oh, and don't forget Lawrence from Arabia |
|
|
|
Post by The Last Stand Soldier on Dec 5, 2015 17:35:34 GMT
Don't forget Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck. 15000 askari against 300000... He was crazy
|
|
|
|
Post by The Last Stand Soldier on Dec 5, 2015 17:37:00 GMT
Don't forget Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck. 15000 askari against 300000... He was crazy It was positive note about him |
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Dec 5, 2015 19:07:46 GMT
WW1, trenchwarfare is brain numbing. In WW2, you at least had some movement in it. WW1 had movement too. The war in the colonies, invading Russia in 1917/1918, the German U-Boats. But yeah the most fighting was in the trenches. oh, and don't forget Lawrence from Arabia I mainly meant the war in the West. In the East, you had Ludendorff and Hindenburg quick-scoping the Russians (Half of the Russian troops didn't have guns :3 ). |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Dec 5, 2015 19:49:39 GMT
WW1 had movement too. The war in the colonies, invading Russia in 1917/1918, the German U-Boats. But yeah the most fighting was in the trenches. oh, and don't forget Lawrence from Arabia I mainly meant the war in the West. In the East, you had Ludendorff and Hindenburg quick-scoping the Russians (Half of the Russian troops didn't have guns :3 ). Mackenson:*Auto Corrected* the trenches, I'm going to 360 noscope the Russians! |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 5, 2015 20:41:14 GMT
Don't forget Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck. 15000 askari against 300000... He was crazy It was positive note about him Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck was one of the best guerilla generals in all of world history but what he did after the war.........sad |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 6, 2015 16:32:34 GMT
^please delete my message above this one..... Also this one You know you can delete them yourself. What you said was a little confusing |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Dec 6, 2015 16:35:43 GMT
I have deleted a few posts of my own previously but I wanted Sherman to do it because he deleted some posts as well
|
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Dec 6, 2015 18:50:35 GMT
WW 2 because innocent civilians were killed due their nationality, religion, race, thinking or innocence. In WW1 mostly soldiers died (which is sad too). By the way about the title: I know I do not speak English fluently but isn't it: which war was worse?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 6, 2015 18:57:56 GMT
WW 2 because innocent civilians were killed due their nationality, religion, race, thinking or innocence. In WW1 mostly soldiers died (which is sad too). By the way about the title: I know I do not speak fluently English but isn't it: which war was worse? Not everybody speaks fluent English. |
|
