|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2015 18:53:08 GMT
Do you want me to make conquest guides and if yes which?
If I wouldn't have won that conquest yet you should have to wait for me to process that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 8, 2015 23:23:49 GMT
Is there a guide for Japan 1950/1960? If not do one of the two (whichever one is easier for you)
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2015 12:14:46 GMT
Is there a guide for Japan 1950/1960? If not do one of the two (whichever one is easier for you) I didn't find any guide about them but I'll start to get going tonight so maybe Sunday it will be ready maybe even faster. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2015 20:33:00 GMT
Is there a guide for Japan 1950/1960? If not do one of the two (whichever one is easier for you) I will do 1960 do you want me to do it with or without additional generals? |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 9, 2015 21:43:45 GMT
Is there a guide for Japan 1950/1960? If not do one of the two (whichever one is easier for you) I will do 1960 do you want me to do it with or without additional generals? Try to do it without but if it becomes too hard then do it with generals |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2015 22:06:01 GMT
I will do 1960 do you want me to do it with or without additional generals? Try to do it without but if it becomes too hard then do it with generals The difference is not that it is harder the difference is about 10-20 turns |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 9, 2015 22:16:26 GMT
Try to do it without but if it becomes too hard then do it with generals The difference is not that it is harder the difference is about 10-20 turns Then do it without generals please. This way everybody can do it |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 10, 2015 1:06:28 GMT
The difference is not that it is harder the difference is about 10-20 turns Then do it without generals please. This way everybody can do it Well if they are in 1960 they should have decent generals by now. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 10, 2015 1:13:40 GMT
Then do it without generals please. This way everybody can do it Well if they are in 1960 they should have decent generals by now. When I reached 1960 I still had garbage generals. and it's just so that it becomes easier for people that don't have high end generals because they just farmed to 1960. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 10, 2015 1:20:53 GMT
Playing the game for all that time has to yield enough medals for at least the beginner generals.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 10, 2015 1:22:29 GMT
Playing the game for all that time has to yield enough medals for at least the beginner generals. Yes but I for example just left my phone open at night and I reached 1960 after a few days. And actually nvm, you can use generals but only cheaper ones (Badoglio, Meyer, Ozawa, etc) because most beginners only have those. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2015 7:40:18 GMT
Playing the game for all that time has to yield enough medals for at least the beginner generals. Yes but I for example just left my phone open at night and I reached 1960 after a few days. And actually nvm, you can use generals but only cheaper ones (Badoglio, Meyer, Ozawa, etc) because most beginners only have those. Well there is no use for begginer generals and I'd had to sell some my upgraded generals which would make me farm more medals to get them back so I will do it without any generals |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Dec 10, 2015 9:21:07 GMT
Playing the game for all that time has to yield enough medals for at least the beginner generals. Yes but I for example just left my phone open at night and I reached 1960 after a few days. And actually nvm, you can use generals but only cheaper ones (Badoglio, Meyer, Ozawa, etc) because most beginners only have those. generals you mentioned, I have all of them plus Nasser, and the best part is that I am in 59 and still no good general  So a guide without generals is good for me (well its good in both ways with or without generals) |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2015 11:26:46 GMT
Yes but I for example just left my phone open at night and I reached 1960 after a few days. And actually nvm, you can use generals but only cheaper ones (Badoglio, Meyer, Ozawa, etc) because most beginners only have those. generals you mentioned, I have all of them plus Nasser, and the best part is that I am in 59 and still no good general So a guide without generals is good for me (well its good in both ways with or without generals) Well you know that if you do it without any generals you need good technology and some wonders. Besides if you don't have the tech it will be a long play |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2015 14:04:56 GMT
Yes but I for example just left my phone open at night and I reached 1960 after a few days. And actually nvm, you can use generals but only cheaper ones (Badoglio, Meyer, Ozawa, etc) because most beginners only have those. generals you mentioned, I have all of them plus Nasser, and the best part is that I am in 59 and still no good general So a guide without generals is good for me (well its good in both ways with or without generals) I think that this will be the longest conquest I've done turn 33 and I have taken Khabarovsk and lost Osaka to USA which is ally by the way and I have my generals(Japan's stock) which got nuked to take Mexico city and south America and I think that this country cannot be fully guided because you can't predict which city is going to be nuked I'd say that you should take one of the coastal cities or Khabarovsk to get started and don't lose Osaka and I have taken/lost Seoul 16 times by now so that's a city which is a hard nut |
|
