|
Post by Seger on Jun 30, 2019 7:09:25 GMT
To be honest, I don't believe these are supposed to be f2p competitions True, the moment is saw it i knew it would be one where atleast one IAP is needed. But hey, beating them being f2p doubles the satisfaction the only problem is that we, players without IAP do not get the time to get some decent gens, with more I could do it but with only cleo it just isn't going to work out. And yes this is just to let players buy IAP
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2019 7:11:59 GMT
True, the moment is saw it i knew it would be one where atleast one IAP is needed. But hey, beating them being f2p doubles the satisfaction the only problem is that we, players without IAP do not get the time to get some decent gens, with more I could do it but with only cleo it just isn't going to work out. And yes this is just to let players buy IAP That is true. Hmmm, i'd say we have a chance, slightly, but there is . I'll need to see everything about the game first
|
|
|
Post by opinionmaker on Jun 30, 2019 7:39:16 GMT
I was expecting that people would complete this at the first day. I guess it wasn't that easy. To those who completed it, did you buy some IAPs and/or medals, or are you f2ps? stoic this will be a harder competition, since there are more android users . Yea I bought spartacus. In all honesty it would have taken a lot longer without him. I struggled a lot on a chapter 4 mission with him and my other generals. I completed this all with Octavian, Spartacus, Antony, and the player general if anyone cares to know
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jun 30, 2019 8:05:08 GMT
I was expecting that people would complete this at the first day. I guess it wasn't that easy. To those who completed it, did you buy some IAPs and/or medals, or are you f2ps? stoic this will be a harder competition, since there are more android users . Yea I bought spartacus. In all honesty it would have taken a lot longer without him. I struggled a lot on a chapter 4 mission with him and my other generals. I completed this all with Octavian, Spartacus, Antony, and the player general if anyone cares to know yes it a shame that you need IAP to win this event, but still if you only bought Spartacus that's pretty good. And What do you think about Antony and Octavian good and not the best? or the best?
|
|
|
Post by opinionmaker on Jun 30, 2019 8:23:26 GMT
I actually quite like antony for his nack of being the usain bolt of the game. It allows for him to pop into battle with ease and be able to retreat to heal. Octavian has been all around pretty good too. I think that he has a slight issue with not having the full nine stars, his skills fit his role as an archer very well. Hes great doing what hes designed to do. In my opinion antony should be getting more praise than people give him credit for on here currently. I would certainly put him above scipio at least. I also dont see how mithradates is that much better, if that to begin with. The only real thing he has over octavian is that he has an extra star in archery, other than that his skills are more lacking in my opinion (I’m looking at jungle for this one)
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jun 30, 2019 8:44:59 GMT
Jungle is better then counter attack for archery because you don't want to do a counter attack because you don't want your archery to be attacked
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2019 8:46:14 GMT
I actually quite like antony for his nack of being the usain bolt of the game. It allows for him to pop into battle with ease and be able to retreat to heal. Octavian has been all around pretty good too. I think that he has a slight issue with not having the full nine stars, his skills fit his role as an archer very well. Hes great doing what hes designed to do. In my opinion antony should be getting more praise than people give him credit for on here currently. I would certainly put him above scipio at least. I also dont see how mithradates is that much better, if that to begin with. The only real thing he has over octavian is that he has an extra star in archery, other than that his skills are more lacking in my opinion (I’m looking at jungle for this one) Good, March ftw . Hmmm, what are the majority of the units you encounter during the campaigns?
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jun 30, 2019 8:49:48 GMT
antony of course lacks 1 skill but the combination of his talent and march looks good, scipio is the best defending cav because his counter attack and urban pile up and if he is also attacked by a larger legion .... but maybe antony compensates that with its speed. I find that difficult to estimate
|
|
|
Post by opinionmaker on Jun 30, 2019 8:52:44 GMT
Jungle is better then counter attack for archery because you don't want to do a counter attack because you don't want your archery to be attacked Ideally you dont, but the only way to attack with archers is by being in range to other enemies. If they had two hex range then I can understand, but archers are in a situation where they have to expose themselves to do anything just like any other unit, and because they are so fragile I appreciate how much I give back to the other unit. Its just my preference on that.
|
|
|
Post by opinionmaker on Jun 30, 2019 8:58:07 GMT
I actually quite like antony for his nack of being the usain bolt of the game. It allows for him to pop into battle with ease and be able to retreat to heal. Octavian has been all around pretty good too. I think that he has a slight issue with not having the full nine stars, his skills fit his role as an archer very well. Hes great doing what hes designed to do. In my opinion antony should be getting more praise than people give him credit for on here currently. I would certainly put him above scipio at least. I also dont see how mithradates is that much better, if that to begin with. The only real thing he has over octavian is that he has an extra star in archery, other than that his skills are more lacking in my opinion (I’m looking at jungle for this one) Good, March ftw . Hmmm, what are the majority of the units you encounter during the campaigns? Its quite a mix up, but something I’ve noticed not being there is navy. I havent really seen a reason to have a navy general yet in campaign. Outisde of it there are certainly instances such as expedition mode. I would say that you should prioritize cavalry over archery though, something I’ve seen is that the early on campaign has more emphasis on cavalry, with archery being a bigger thing a bit later. But as I said to Lumen, thats just what I saw and I bought Octavian before anyone else. I only got Spartacus at the Slave Revolt chapter (ironic).
|
|
|
Post by Navia Lanoira on Jun 30, 2019 9:08:29 GMT
Jungle is better then counter attack for archery because you don't want to do a counter attack because you don't want your archery to be attacked Ideally you dont, but the only way to attack with archers is by being in range to other enemies. If they had two hex range then I can understand, but archers are in a situation where they have to expose themselves to do anything just like any other unit, and because they are so fragile I appreciate how much I give back to the other unit. Its just my preference on that. Wait, archers have only one hex range?
|
|
|
Post by opinionmaker on Jun 30, 2019 9:13:08 GMT
Ideally you dont, but the only way to attack with archers is by being in range to other enemies. If they had two hex range then I can understand, but archers are in a situation where they have to expose themselves to do anything just like any other unit, and because they are so fragile I appreciate how much I give back to the other unit. Its just my preference on that. Wait, archers have only one hex range? Yes, they are sort of glass cannons for the game. Its really tricky finding the balance of exposure and utility for them. To be clear, every unit has just one hex range, which is interesting in how that changes combat.
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jun 30, 2019 9:30:15 GMT
Yes, they are sort of glass cannons for the game. Its really tricky finding the balance of exposure and utility for them. To be clear, every unit has just one hex range, which is interesting in how that changes combat. i use my inf as a shield for cleo while she attacks important units and gens, the thing I like about archery is that they're also good against gens Who are better then them because the will not get counter attacked
|
|
|
Post by Navia Lanoira on Jun 30, 2019 10:53:08 GMT
Yes, they are sort of glass cannons for the game. Its really tricky finding the balance of exposure and utility for them. To be clear, every unit has just one hex range, which is interesting in how that changes combat. i use my inf as a shield for cleo while she attacks important units and gens, the thing I like about archery is that they're also good against gens Who are better then them because the will not get counter attacked So archers have an ability that the enemy will not counter attack.
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jun 30, 2019 11:00:50 GMT
Yes! But other archers do counter them
|
|