|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 9, 2015 14:46:57 GMT
Dombrowski the best?
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Dec 9, 2015 14:51:42 GMT
Actually Radetsky, by his Defense Tactic, I can do crazy sl, and...  |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 9, 2015 15:45:03 GMT
I have Radetzky and he is outgunned by Golitsyn.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 9, 2015 15:45:18 GMT
The defense tactic barely triggers
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Dec 9, 2015 15:50:19 GMT
The defense tactic barely triggers Save and load, until it triggers. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Dec 9, 2015 15:53:15 GMT
The defense tactic barely triggers Save and load, until it triggers. It's unsporting  |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 9, 2015 16:24:36 GMT
The defense tactic barely triggers Save and load, until it triggers. I'm not that passionate about EW4. And that's kind of cheating |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Dec 9, 2015 16:48:10 GMT
i'll go MURAT THE BEAST
|
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Dec 9, 2015 17:43:56 GMT
Infantry: Suvorov Wut? And just btw what makes Murat better than Lasalle? Since the category is infantry then Suvorov. But if I can have only one general and need to pick between Suvorov and Lannes, then I will go for Lannes. Does this make you happy?  And the reason I think Murat is better than Lasalle is simply because I find demolishing fortress job is annoying. |
|
|
|
Post by Moreau on Dec 9, 2015 18:06:01 GMT
Survov
We shall defeat those who dishonour your name
Salute
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 9, 2015 22:17:41 GMT
Since the category is infantry then Suvorov. But if I can have only one general and need to pick between Suvorov and Lannes, then I will go for Lannes. Does this make you happy? And the reason I think Murat is better than Lasalle is simply because I find demolishing fortress job is annoying. Yes it does. actually imo none of them is better. |
|
|
|
Post by Grouchy on Dec 10, 2015 1:19:32 GMT
Well Lasalle is better for killing ordinary units, while Murat is more for destroying structures. I think we can all agree that neither is better than the other as a whole as they each serve a different purpose
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 10, 2015 1:20:53 GMT
Well Lasalle is better for killing ordinary units, while Murat is more for destroying structures. I think we can all agree that neither is better than the other as a whole as they each serve a different purpose True. Murat is good at destroying forts with guard cavalry and Lasalle can destroy nations alone with armored cars |
|
|
|
Post by Moreau on Dec 10, 2015 10:51:58 GMT
And survov is pureley for infantry
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 12, 2015 7:09:46 GMT
Survov We shall defeat those who dishonour your name Salute anybody know where Suvorov even is? I bet he's in front of my door in Switzerland with an army and two bottles of Vodka. and you will pay for this. |
|
