|
|
Post by nooblord on May 20, 2016 15:51:11 GMT
Yeah actually ditch Fatimah and keep Dearborn
|
|
jkmj
First Lieutenant
Posts: 17 
|
Post by jkmj on May 21, 2016 3:13:54 GMT
Just don't replace Radetzky. He is better than Golitsyn and LaSalle (Mobility=0) Can someone replace Radetzky? Dombrowski: I can. About Dombrowski, he's the Cav Gen of Poland, right? He is quite the strong Cav Gen, but isn't that because he is originally on the POLAND faction? POLAND have strong Cavalries, so if I use him from another faction(e.g. Great Britain, Sardinia, ect.), will he keep his POLAND advantages? |
|
jkmj
First Lieutenant
Posts: 17
|
Post by jkmj on May 21, 2016 3:56:52 GMT
Tier-3 included: Lan+Dombrowski/Radetzky/Berthier/Lasalle(last slot) against human. Murat(sl)+Sulkowski(non-sl) against forts. Poniatowski/Berthier/Davout/Lannes for speed. Tier-2 included: What you have said. Tier-1 included(crazy) Lan+Junot/Charles against people. Against forts? If you want to give Arnold or Blasius 5*cav. Sounds about right You all put Lan in all tiers. Is she really that good? Or is it because she's free(non-purchased)? I tend to use her as backup for Radetzky so I didn't really notice. And one more thing, what does s&l or sl means? I apologize for my ignorance. |
|
|
|
Post by golitsynthebeast on May 21, 2016 4:27:46 GMT
S&l means save and load.
You use it when you have a general with assault/defence art to get a trigger.
It is primarily used in tough campaing missions and princess conquests.
If you have the patience and plan correctly, you are sure to win a quick victory and get a better result than your previous tries.
It's a cheap thing to do, but you have to do all to win, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 21, 2016 6:40:05 GMT
Sounds about right You all put Lan in all tiers. Is she really that good? Or is it because she's free(non-purchased)? I tend to use her as backup for Radetzky so I didn't really notice. And one more thing, what does s&l or sl means? I apologize for my ignorance. She is the BEST. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 21, 2016 6:41:12 GMT
Can someone replace Radetzky? Dombrowski: I can. About Dombrowski, he's the Cav Gen of Poland, right? He is quite the strong Cav Gen, but isn't that because he is originally on the POLAND faction? POLAND have strong Cavalries, so if I use him from another faction(e.g. Great Britain, Sardinia, ect.), will he keep his POLAND advantages? There's no difference if you put a general on units from different nations. |
|
jkmj
First Lieutenant
Posts: 17
|
Post by jkmj on May 21, 2016 6:57:12 GMT
About Dombrowski, he's the Cav Gen of Poland, right? He is quite the strong Cav Gen, but isn't that because he is originally on the POLAND faction? POLAND have strong Cavalries, so if I use him from another faction(e.g. Great Britain, Sardinia, ect.), will he keep his POLAND advantages? There's no difference if you put a general on units from different nations. So let's say, I use Dombrowski on a Sardinian Guard Cav and go against a Polish Dombrowski Guard Cav. Are they are both equal and have no advantages to either one? |
|
|
|
Post by Washington on May 21, 2016 10:35:01 GMT
There's no difference if you put a general on units from different nations. So let's say, I use Dombrowski on a Sardinian Guard Cav and go against a Polish Dombrowski Guard Cav. Are they are both equal and have no advantages to either one? No each country have different benefits |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on May 21, 2016 12:42:27 GMT
There's no difference if you put a general on units from different nations. So let's say, I use Dombrowski on a Sardinian Guard Cav and go against a Polish Dombrowski Guard Cav. Are they are both equal and have no advantages to either one? Actually yes but the difference isn't huge. Many nations (France, Ottoman, Britain, Russian, etc) have advantages for some units and Poland has the best siege artillery with Russia for example. Here's the link to it: european-war-4.boards.net/thread/2124/ew4-countries-unit-system-analysis |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 21, 2016 12:52:02 GMT
There's no difference if you put a general on units from different nations. So let's say, I use Dombrowski on a Sardinian Guard Cav and go against a Polish Dombrowski Guard Cav. Are they are both equal and have no advantages to either one? Polish Dombrowskiwill have advantage. But that's the advantage between Poland and Sardinia. French, Russian and Ottoman system share the strongest guard cav, and Poland is in Russian system. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on May 21, 2016 21:31:47 GMT
So let's say, I use Dombrowski on a Sardinian Guard Cav and go against a Polish Dombrowski Guard Cav. Are they are both equal and have no advantages to either one? Polish Dombrowskiwill have advantage. But that's the advantage between Poland and Sardinia. French, Russian and Ottoman system share the strongest guard cav, and Poland is in Russian system. I think jkmj is asking if Dombrowski is actually strong or if he only seems to be OP because Polish Cav is OP. The answer is that he will beat your enemies up with Saxon light Cavalry |
|
jkmj
First Lieutenant
Posts: 17
|
Post by jkmj on May 22, 2016 0:53:28 GMT
Polish Dombrowskiwill have advantage. But that's the advantage between Poland and Sardinia. French, Russian and Ottoman system share the strongest guard cav, and Poland is in Russian system. I think jkmj is asking if Dombrowski is actually strong or if he only seems to be OP because Polish Cav is OP. The answer is that he will beat your enemies up with Saxon light Cavalry Something like that. For example, when going against the French Art Gen NAPOLEON, you will experience how ridiculously OP he is, yet when you(the player) use him, he is somehow only above average or something. He is only OP because he in on the French Faction. Anywhere else, he is only above average. How about Dombrowski? Is he great whatever country he is in, or maybe it's just the illusion that he is OP because you will/tend_to use him on the Polish Faction? Sorry if my question(s) seems repetitive. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on May 22, 2016 1:39:34 GMT
I think jkmj is asking if Dombrowski is actually strong or if he only seems to be OP because Polish Cav is OP. The answer is that he will beat your enemies up with Saxon light Cavalry Something like that. For example, when going against the French Art Gen NAPOLEON, you will experience how ridiculously OP he is, yet when you(the player) use him, he is somehow only above average or something. He is only OP because he in on the French Faction. Anywhere else, he is only above average. How about Dombrowski? Is he great whatever country he is in, or maybe it's just the illusion that he is OP because you will/tend_to use him on the Polish Faction? Sorry if my question(s) seems repetitive. Dombrowski is strong on anything. He has the two good Cav skills, plus Defense Art for s/l and Banner for rich people. That's the top of the Cav General Skill set. I've used him on almost every cav unit on most systems and he's always a BEAST |
|
jkmj
First Lieutenant
Posts: 17
|
Post by jkmj on May 22, 2016 2:02:53 GMT
Something like that. For example, when going against the French Art Gen NAPOLEON, you will experience how ridiculously OP he is, yet when you(the player) use him, he is somehow only above average or something. He is only OP because he in on the French Faction. Anywhere else, he is only above average. How about Dombrowski? Is he great whatever country he is in, or maybe it's just the illusion that he is OP because you will/tend_to use him on the Polish Faction? Sorry if my question(s) seems repetitive. Dombrowski is strong on anything. He has the two good Cav skills, plus Defense Art for s/l and Banner for rich people. That's the top of the Cav General Skill set. I've used him on almost every cav unit on most systems and he's always a BEAST Is that so? I'll take note of that whenever I see him in the academy roster. Banner... I have the three +2 Atk,Def,Sup but I never really noticed them to have an effect, which is why I just leave them at the warehouse. Anyway, I got an idea of who I should recruit now. Thanks for everything. |
|
