|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 2, 2019 19:37:40 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by yuanzhong on Jul 2, 2019 23:09:10 GMT
Best infantry gen IMO.  |
|
|
|
Spartacus
Jul 2, 2019 23:47:38 GMT
via mobile
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 2, 2019 23:47:38 GMT
Best infantry gen IMO. All iaps are the best in their tier fortunately |
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jul 3, 2019 5:17:49 GMT
Best infantry gen IMO. All iaps are the best in their tier fortunately As non IAP player I wouldn't call it "fortunately"  |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 3, 2019 9:14:15 GMT
All iaps are the best in their tier fortunately As non IAP player I wouldn't call it "fortunately" Well you gotta see it from our prospective too. If we pay 8.99$ for a general, we definitely expect him to be good. Making him the best in the tier is a good idea. But what i do find kind of unfair is that they have aura buffs whereas no one else other than the free commander can have one. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2019 9:17:40 GMT
As non IAP player I wouldn't call it "fortunately" Well you gotta see it from our prospective too. If we pay 8.99$ for a general, we definitely expect him to be good. Making him the best in the tier is a good idea. But what i do find kind of unfair is that they have aura buffs whereas no one else other than the free commander can have one. Yup, aside from your free general, no one else other than the IAP gens have the Aura talent. Easytech may add some later on, hopefully |
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jul 3, 2019 9:23:56 GMT
As non IAP player I wouldn't call it "fortunately" Well you gotta see it from our prospective too. If we pay 8.99$ for a general, we definitely expect him to be good. Making him the best in the tier is a good idea. But what i do find kind of unfair is that they have aura buffs whereas no one else other than the free commander can have one. But the difference matter in ew6 napoleon was slightly better then Mahmud II while in Gcr the difference is much bigger because of the aura skill |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2019 10:48:49 GMT
Well you gotta see it from our prospective too. If we pay 8.99$ for a general, we definitely expect him to be good. Making him the best in the tier is a good idea. But what i do find kind of unfair is that they have aura buffs whereas no one else other than the free commander can have one. But the difference matter in ew6 napoleon was slightly better then Mahmud II while in Gcr the difference is much bigger because of the aura skill I don't think Mithridates is that far from Caesar, but that 15% aura to archers is pretty good. |
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jul 3, 2019 11:14:59 GMT
But the difference matter in ew6 napoleon was slightly better then Mahmud II while in Gcr the difference is much bigger because of the aura skill I don't think Mithridates is that far from Caesar, but that 15% aura to archers is pretty good. But the difference between Hannibal and arminius Seems pretty big |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2019 11:36:14 GMT
I don't think Mithridates is that far from Caesar, but that 15% aura to archers is pretty good. But the difference between Hannibal and arminius Seems pretty big Can't really say for sure, but yes, Hannibal has quite an advantage compared to his non IAP counterparts |
|
|
|
Spartacus
Jul 3, 2019 13:45:24 GMT
via mobile
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 3, 2019 13:45:24 GMT
I don't think Mithridates is that far from Caesar, but that 15% aura to archers is pretty good. But the difference between Hannibal and arminius Seems pretty big Thats definitely true. Unfortunately thats why I recommend purchasing Hannibal above all. Arminius, while being a very good cavarly general in his own right, lacks hannibal’s. On the other end though, arminius’ output might be higher than hannibal’s due to his jungle fighting |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 3, 2019 15:11:20 GMT
Yeah even if he can’t beat pompey or vercingetorix in one on one combat, he is still better than both at wrecking archers and has an aura. In a team with those two, he would be unstoppable
|
|
|
|
Post by Ralyks on Jul 3, 2019 21:34:53 GMT
I beg to differ. Although on paper Hanibal is clearly the best, his aura skill is used quite less, as by far the most seen troop are infantry, also by the IA (when its your ally in campaigns/conquests), so I will not say Hannibal is too farm from at least Spartacus, about Caesar... I don't think he deserves to be the most expensive one of the 3, so IMO this leaves him as the worst deal of them all.
Well, even if he had the same price, I'll probably still hold that opinion, just not as good as the other two.
|
|
|
|
Spartacus
Jul 3, 2019 23:12:20 GMT
via mobile
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 3, 2019 23:12:20 GMT
I beg to differ. Although on paper Hanibal is clearly the best, his aura skill is used quite less, as by far the most seen troop are infantry, also by the IA (when its your ally in campaigns/conquests), so I will not say Hannibal is too farm from at least Spartacus, about Caesar... I don't think he deserves to be the most expensive one of the 3, so IMO this leaves him as the worst deal of them all. Well, even at even price, I'll probably still hold that opinion, just not as strong. About caesar, don’t forget that he does come at consul, whereas spartacus only at general. And also don’t forget how crappy caesar’s alternatives in the game are. Although if you do a 3-3-2 lineup, perhaps mih iv and octavian will suffice by themselves. There are all aura buffs so it won’t matter too much |
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jul 4, 2019 7:00:11 GMT
I beg to differ. Although on paper Hanibal is clearly the best, his aura skill is used quite less, as by far the most seen troop are infantry, also by the IA (when its your ally in campaigns/conquests), so I will not say Hannibal is too farm from at least Spartacus, about Caesar... I don't think he deserves to be the most expensive one of the 3, so IMO this leaves him as the worst deal of them all. Well, even at even price, I'll probably still hold that opinion, just not as strong. About caesar, don’t forget that he does come at consul, whereas spartacus only at general. And also don’t forget how crappy caesar’s alternatives in the game are. Although if you do a 3-3-2 lineup, perhaps mih iv and octavian will suffice by themselves. There are all aura buffs so it won’t matter too much we have 11 gens+the commander So I think the best lineup is 4-4-4. Btw mithridates crappy? Mithridates has better skills then caesar |
|
