|
|
Post by xerexes on Aug 30, 2019 10:15:32 GMT
In conquest, I only use Anthony and Pompey. Hannibal is only used for defending as his mobility is limited and you wouldn’t have much motivation to micro him around in huge conquest maps.
Generals without march like Hannibal and Arminius are mostly for use in campaign where the Maps are smaller and much higher output is required as the enemy forces are reinforced.
Equipping Anthony with golden spear will make up for his lack of output. It’s his major powerspike.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 30, 2019 10:41:15 GMT
In conquest, I only use Anthony and Pompey. Hannibal is only used for defending as his mobility is limited and you wouldn’t have much motivation to micro him around in huge conquest maps. Generals without march like Hannibal and Arminius are mostly for use in campaign where the Maps are smaller and much higher output is required as the enemy forces are reinforced. Equipping Anthony with golden spear will make up for his lack of output. It’s his major powerspike. Idk, I personally use everyone of my generals in conquest, even pedius and pacorus. But thats pretty impressive |
|
|
|
Post by Erich on Aug 30, 2019 11:17:36 GMT
In case of rushing for a rate of III or a record in conquest so yeah less gens used the better. But if you only need to win a large conquest map lately in hundreds turns with hordes of enemies around, Antony’s a bit fragile. But the output between him and Arminius is not that much so I prefer to have Antony. Maybe an item to increase HP/Defense point suit him best, and they’re not expensive  |
|
|
|
Post by kingbutawl on Aug 30, 2019 11:50:02 GMT
In case of rushing for a rate of III or a record in conquest so yeah less gens used the better. But if you only need to win a large conquest map lately in hundreds turns with hordes of enemies around, Antony’s a bit fragile. But the output between him and Arminius is not that much so I prefer to have Antony. Maybe an item to increase HP/Defense point suit him best, and they’re not expensive I got 490k in Pompey-Rome , using the free general and Scipio . |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 30, 2019 12:59:51 GMT
In case of rushing for a rate of III or a record in conquest so yeah less gens used the better. But if you only need to win a large conquest map lately in hundreds turns with hordes of enemies around, Antony’s a bit fragile. But the output between him and Arminius is not that much so I prefer to have Antony. Maybe an item to increase HP/Defense point suit him best, and they’re not expensive Thats true. If you need a rate of 3, use only your best 3 generals |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 30, 2019 13:00:04 GMT
In case of rushing for a rate of III or a record in conquest so yeah less gens used the better. But if you only need to win a large conquest map lately in hundreds turns with hordes of enemies around, Antony’s a bit fragile. But the output between him and Arminius is not that much so I prefer to have Antony. Maybe an item to increase HP/Defense point suit him best, and they’re not expensive I got 490k in Pompey-Rome , using the free general and Scipio . Noice! |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 30, 2019 13:00:34 GMT
But once you get the rate of 3, its much easier to then beat every other conquest using as many generals on your team as you can
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2019 4:35:51 GMT
Antony is better. Makes campaigns and conquest easier. Even though most say Arminius is better for the casual player, i'd say Antony is better for the casual player. More options, can bail himself out if you make a mistake. Easy
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 1, 2019 12:15:37 GMT
Antony is better. Makes campaigns and conquest easier. Even though most say Arminius is better for the casual player, i'd say Antony is better for the casual player. More options, can bail himself out if you make a mistake. Easy Agreed. Arminius is quite good though in campaigns. So he is a solid next best choice |
|
|
|
Post by zabadanov86 on Sept 1, 2019 13:03:37 GMT
If you upgrade Anthonys march to lvl 4 I think he moves 2 hex more on heavy cavlary then Arminius,am I right?
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 1, 2019 13:09:57 GMT
If you upgrade Anthonys march to lvl 4 I think he moves 2 hex more on heavy cavlary then Arminius,am I right? In conquest yes, in campaign no. But if you combine that with the effects geography has, as much as 3 in conquest, and 2 in campaigns |
|
|
|
Post by kingbutawl on Sept 1, 2019 13:44:10 GMT
Arminius=Vercyngetorix
Anthony=Pompey
|
|
|
|
Post by zabadanov86 on Sept 1, 2019 13:52:52 GMT
If you don't have Hannibal Arminius can do his job. But in both combination Anthony is a must have I think. Don't know do we need 3 Cavalry generals?
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 1, 2019 16:43:11 GMT
If you don't have Hannibal Arminius can do his job. But in both combination Anthony is a must have I think. Don't know do we need 3 Cavalry generals? Probably, but the 3rd can be Pacorus I |
|
|
|
Post by kingbutawl on Sept 1, 2019 19:02:03 GMT
You can have 4 cav generals
|
|
