|
|
Post by kingbutawl on Jul 30, 2019 11:52:24 GMT
If you have Mythridates isn't better to focus on health and mobility rather than attack ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 30, 2019 11:57:04 GMT
If you have Mythridates isn't better to focus on health and mobility rather than attack ? You mean in tech. I’d probably get all lvl 1s to balance everything out |
|
|
|
Post by kingbutawl on Jul 30, 2019 12:19:53 GMT
Mythridates at the beginning is a delusion and you regret Drusus .... However I saw that with a lot of health you can activate all of his remaining skills but it is a long work , even harder than bulking Arminius ...
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2019 12:29:46 GMT
If you have Mythridates isn't better to focus on health and mobility rather than attack ? I'd go mobility and attack. Health and defense are useless stats for archers(unless someone proves me wrong). Archers die quickly anyway, against Infantry and even against cavalry. Might as well give them attack and mobility so they can move around and hit hard, rather than not hit hard and die a turn later. |
|
|
|
Post by kingbutawl on Jul 30, 2019 14:12:54 GMT
So that skill that says "increase crit attack with larger force than enemy" (I don't remember that correctly) , does it refer to attack or general's health ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2019 14:16:08 GMT
So that skill that says "increase crit attack with larger force than enemy" (I don't remember that correctly) , does it refer to attack or general's health ? Health doesn't count. Larger force means having more units that your general commands than the enemy(having more blue bubbles than them basically). |
|
|
|
Post by kingbutawl on Jul 30, 2019 14:32:44 GMT
Man , this means Mythridates is weaker than Drusus....
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2019 14:47:22 GMT
Man , this means Mythridates is weaker than Drusus.... Not necessarily. Giving the Laurel crown to Mithridates makes him a better Drusus. Having a golden ring on him plus spamming Oration for Mithridates is also good. But yeah, upon deployment, more often than not Drusus is better than Mithridates damage wise. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 30, 2019 14:59:59 GMT
Deleted, the best skill in the game is commander. Are You serious about Drusus? I can understand this guy with banana, but You..
|
|
|
|
Post by dsongop on Jul 30, 2019 15:05:58 GMT
Mithridates IV is without a doubt better than Drussus, even Octavian is just for the sheer value of their skills. Drussus' skill levels start out low, he lacks commander and an extra slot, has two mediocore ones, and isn't even that cheap. Without a morale boost, Mithridates still often has higher output than Drussus. Mithridates is literally Caesar with jungle fighting and a lower rank. Drussus is good, but Mithridates is a way better investment.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2019 15:08:06 GMT
Deleted , the best skill in the game is commander. Are You serious about Drusus? I can understand this guy with banana, but You.. Yeah, i'm serious about Drusus  . But that doesn't mean i think Mithridates is worse. I just said that Drusus will be better upon deployment, although this is more true in conquests than in campaign, since in campaigns you can find archers with 4-5 bubbles to where you can place Mithridates. I don't have both generals, so i'm basing my ideas on how each of them work. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 30, 2019 15:09:25 GMT
dsongop, agree. Commander skill means You literally use tank if speaking in WC4 terms. I can't understand comparing commander gens and non-commander... Another league
|
|
|
|
Post by kingbutawl on Jul 30, 2019 15:18:28 GMT
Deleted, the best skill in the game is commander. Are You serious about Drusus? I can understand this guy with banana, but You.. Drusus is good when you play aggressively . Mythridates deals double the damage (or precisely he can do that each four attacks) but He receives 25 more damage than Drusus by archers . More over Mythryl can only hold a golden ring, but Drusus can boost his critic by 15% . They cost almost the same price at the end , because they are both strong (Drusus is always strong , Mythridates sometimes is stronger than Caesar). Perfectly balanced as all things should be . |
|
|
|
Post by kingbutawl on Jul 30, 2019 15:25:08 GMT
I tried Drusus and Mythridates on the same unit in the fifth Caesar campaign and the first one dealed more damage than "lion cape" .
Drusus 171 damage against 168 of Mythridates , but the conqueror of Germania managed to critic hit two or three times more against stronger or equally thick units . Mythridates in a fair game with the same amount of troops of the opponent can only overwhelm him 1 out of 4 .
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 30, 2019 15:26:28 GMT
Deleted, the best skill in the game is commander. Are You serious about Drusus? I can understand this guy with banana, but You.. Drusus is good when you play aggressively . Mythridates deals double the damage (or precisely he can do that each four attacks) but He receives 25 more damage than Drusus by archers . More over Mythryl can only hold a golden ring, but Drusus can boost his critic by 15% . They cost almost the same price at the end , because they are both strong (Drusus is always strong , Mythridates sometimes is stronger than Caesar). Perfectly balanced as all things should be . No problem. Take Drusus. You've mentioned all Drusus skills and one Mithri skill. Awesome comparison. If You plan to use Your archer gen against archers... I can't help You.. or wait.. there is Tigranes II. Also has anti-archer "feature". |
|
. But that doesn't mean i think Mithridates is worse. I just said that Drusus will be better upon deployment, although this is more true in conquests than in campaign, since in campaigns you can find archers with 4-5 bubbles to where you can place Mithridates. I don't have both generals, so i'm basing my ideas on how each of them work. 
