|
|
Post by Jeanne d'Arc on Aug 20, 2019 0:34:59 GMT
Which is the best cavalry general?
|
|
|
|
Post by Reinhard Von Lohengramm on Aug 20, 2019 0:36:12 GMT
Im a f2p player and the best for me is Murat  |
|
|
|
Post by Jeanne d'Arc on Aug 20, 2019 0:55:44 GMT
That was quick. Well, you're not the only one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 20, 2019 2:00:01 GMT
Blucher for me. 85 damage from his skills, + 50% from ability, + 25% from plain fighting = monster. But I think that ney with an aura and the iron cross is probably even stronger
|
|
|
|
Post by dsongop on Aug 20, 2019 5:05:38 GMT
Blucher for sure, Murat is a close second though
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2019 6:01:48 GMT
Blucher for sure, Murat is a close second though Bruh Drusus isn't trash. Back to topic, Blucher is the best no doubt. No one really comes close to the amount of wrecking power he has. Second is Murat. |
|
|
|
Post by dsongop on Aug 20, 2019 7:13:41 GMT
Blucher for sure, Murat is a close second though Bruh Drusus isn't trash. Back to topic, Blucher is the best no doubt. No one really comes close to the amount of wrecking power he has. Second is Murat. Drusus is worse than Surena. And just to add, Dabrowski, Ney, Davout, and Lan are also very good. I was even thinking about buying Radetzky for an all cavalry team |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2019 8:22:23 GMT
Bruh Drusus isn't trash. Back to topic, Blucher is the best no doubt. No one really comes close to the amount of wrecking power he has. Second is Murat. Drusus is worse than Surena. And just to add, Dabrowski, Ney, Davout, and Lan are also very good. I was even thinking about buying Radetzky for an all cavalry team All archer gens are dwarfed by the magnificence of Surena. Also, to finalize, Blucher is the best Cavalry Gen, Murat is the best non iap Cavalry Gen, and all others are inferior and wish they were half as great as Blucher |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 20, 2019 12:06:24 GMT
Bruh Drusus isn't trash. Back to topic, Blucher is the best no doubt. No one really comes close to the amount of wrecking power he has. Second is Murat. Drusus is worse than Surena. And just to add, Dabrowski, Ney, Davout, and Lan are also very good. I was even thinking about buying Radetzky for an all cavalry team I don’t see what use Radetzky would have. Why not Paget? |
|
|
|
Post by dsongop on Aug 20, 2019 14:56:19 GMT
Drusus is worse than Surena. And just to add, Dabrowski, Ney, Davout, and Lan are also very good. I was even thinking about buying Radetzky for an all cavalry team I don’t see what use Radetzky would have. Why not Paget? Defense and a terrain skill. Ultimately Davout, Ney, etc do Paget's job way better. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 20, 2019 14:59:45 GMT
I don’t see what use Radetzky would have. Why not Paget? Defense and a terrain skill. Ultimately Davout, Ney, etc do Paget's job way better. Dsongop. What about the princess Isabella? She has a better rank than radetsky, can defend cities better, and has good defense. Basically, she is radetsky and then some. |
|
|
|
Post by dsongop on Aug 20, 2019 15:35:32 GMT
Defense and a terrain skill. Ultimately Davout, Ney, etc do Paget's job way better. Dsongop. What about the princess Isabella? She has a better rank than radetsky, can defend cities better, and has good defense. Basically, she is radetsky and then some. Well she's decent, but she doesn't have any consistent offensive damage output skills, and her raw attack is lower if I recall correctly. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 20, 2019 15:58:00 GMT
Dsongop. What about the princess Isabella? She has a better rank than radetsky, can defend cities better, and has good defense. Basically, she is radetsky and then some. Well she's decent, but she doesn't have any consistent offensive damage output skills, and her raw attack is lower if I recall correctly. What about Bagration? I can see how radetsky would be decent, but prince is too low. Bagration is king, and has strike. He is a good city grabber and cheap. I agree with isabella. |
|
|
|
Post by dsongop on Aug 20, 2019 18:02:10 GMT
Well she's decent, but she doesn't have any consistent offensive damage output skills, and her raw attack is lower if I recall correctly. What about Bagration? I can see how radetsky would be decent, but prince is too low. Bagration is king, and has strike. He is a good city grabber and cheap. I agree with isabella. He's decent, honestly I'd take him over Radetzsky because he's so cheap |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 20, 2019 18:03:43 GMT
What about Bagration? I can see how radetsky would be decent, but prince is too low. Bagration is king, and has strike. He is a good city grabber and cheap. I agree with isabella. He's decent, honestly I'd take him over Radetzsky because he's so cheap Well there you go. Plus anytime you need to take a city, just take it with Bagration. The quality difference between them is actually in favor of bagration |
|
