|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 3, 2020 18:15:45 GMT
wow they stack in the prequel. Thats pretty overpowered Yeah. We had up to 3 auras together at a time, and even the miltia hit for over 100 damage in that pack. |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Apr 3, 2020 19:06:10 GMT
wow they stack in the prequel. Thats pretty overpowered They also worked differently. In 1804 they added a raw +20 atk to the unit. In 1914 they add a cumulative +20% attack to your general atk multiplier. So yeah, aura was WAY better in the prequel. That said, I still found them slightly overrated because Aura-stacking requires a large investment of general slots and resources. 100 damage militia was probably the worst idea. I mean, you need to use 3 infantry generals at one place and spam militia. Which are slow as a snail, really frail (and thus not cost-efficient), and totally useless against cities. Super inefficient. Artillery aura was also pretty bad for similar reasons. What I mostly did in the prequel is using cav teams of 2-3 generals, preferably with an aura general on each team. Or having three cav auras together to hit really hard at a point and then diverge. I also used artillery generals solo to support them vs high lv cities. |
|
|
|
Post by SandcrawlerII on Apr 30, 2020 18:13:37 GMT
Gents, who should be my first navy gen; Beatty or Hipper? I've noticed there is a lot of praise for Beatty here, but I've also noticed there is no discussion thread for Hipper (nor is he included in most "general list"), so I assume he is pretty new and thus not included in this top 3 list.
My main reason for getting a navy general is that I know I will have a hard time with the British campaign. Sea warfare has never been my strongest side, and I've even had difficulties with the few navy missions in the German campaign already.
|
|
|
|
Post by kingbutawl on Apr 30, 2020 18:43:42 GMT
Gents, who should be my first navy gen; Beatty or Hipper? I've noticed there is a lot of praise for Beatty here, but I've also noticed there is no discussion thread for Hipper (nor is he included in most "general list"), so I assume he is pretty new and thus not included in this top 3 list. My main reason for getting a navy general is that I know I will have a hard time with the British campaign. Sea warfare has never been my strongest side, and I've even had difficulties with the few navy missions in the German campaign already. Even Duke of Aosta is the man for your pervert desires  |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on May 1, 2020 2:13:09 GMT
Gents, who should be my first navy gen; Beatty or Hipper? I've noticed there is a lot of praise for Beatty here, but I've also noticed there is no discussion thread for Hipper (nor is he included in most "general list"), so I assume he is pretty new and thus not included in this top 3 list. My main reason for getting a navy general is that I know I will have a hard time with the British campaign. Sea warfare has never been my strongest side, and I've even had difficulties with the few navy missions in the German campaign already. Even Duke of Aosta is the man for your pervert desires Why sexualize it? Ugh. |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on May 1, 2020 3:10:03 GMT
Gents, who should be my first navy gen; Beatty or Hipper? I've noticed there is a lot of praise for Beatty here, but I've also noticed there is no discussion thread for Hipper (nor is he included in most "general list"), so I assume he is pretty new and thus not included in this top 3 list. My main reason for getting a navy general is that I know I will have a hard time with the British campaign. Sea warfare has never been my strongest side, and I've even had difficulties with the few navy missions in the German campaign already. Get beatty first, then Hipper. Reason is that, theres no reason. Both are equally competent and its up to personal choice who you would want to get first  |
|
|
|
Post by SandcrawlerII on May 1, 2020 5:11:24 GMT
Once again, thanks for the tip! |
|
|
|
Post by kingbutawl on May 1, 2020 6:54:58 GMT
Even Duke of Aosta is the man for your pervert desires Why sexualize it? Ugh. Because he's helpful in conquest when playing Italy |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on May 1, 2020 8:38:30 GMT
Because he's helpful in conquest when playing Italy Being helpful does not equate to carnal desires haha |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on May 1, 2020 8:38:50 GMT
Once again, thanks for the tip! and no worries, naval skirmishes are pretty fun in the game! |
|
|
|
Post by kingbutawl on May 1, 2020 12:34:13 GMT
Because he's helpful in conquest when playing Italy Being helpful does not equate to carnal desires haha Women only make with helpful men |
|
|
|
Post by SandcrawlerII on May 2, 2020 10:41:02 GMT
How should I upgrade my generals with my finite amount of gold? Should I invest in items, upgrade their skills or upgrade their rank/nobility?
|
|
|
|
Post by Navia Lanoira on May 2, 2020 12:36:19 GMT
How should I upgrade my generals with my finite amount of gold? Should I invest in items, upgrade their skills or upgrade their rank/nobility? Healing items first, then its either upgrade skills while upgrading rank or attack items. |
|
|
|
Post by SandcrawlerII on May 2, 2020 12:59:18 GMT
How should I upgrade my generals with my finite amount of gold? Should I invest in items, upgrade their skills or upgrade their rank/nobility? Healing items first, then its either upgrade skills while upgrading rank or attack items. Thanks! Should I prioritize upgrading my generals over tech/training? Or tech over generals? |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on May 2, 2020 13:22:57 GMT
Healing items first, then its either upgrade skills while upgrading rank or attack items. Thanks! Should I prioritize upgrading my generals over tech/training? Or tech over generals? tech over generals, until it is upgraded to a decent/sufficient level. Movement upgrades are very useful |
|
