brod
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 11
|
Post by brod on Dec 29, 2019 22:37:13 GMT
.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Dec 30, 2019 1:21:12 GMT
At least Agha is the cheapest Cav trainer.
The rest are not that useful, except KAHIA THE GREAT!
|
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Dec 30, 2019 8:36:10 GMT
Caradja probably.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jan 17, 2020 15:12:49 GMT
Suchet is 8 emblems but sucks so badly there are bronze tier generals better than him
|
|
|
|
Post by henry8822 on Jan 18, 2020 15:00:01 GMT
Suchet is 8 emblems but sucks so badly there are bronze tier generals better than him He's basically a worst version of Ney |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jan 18, 2020 15:09:01 GMT
Suchet is 8 emblems but sucks so badly there are bronze tier generals better than him He's basically a worst version of Ney He is a general with good movement, spy, and good training stars. Thats it. While training stars are important, they don’t make a general good. Why not get alexander even who at least has 5 star trading and economic power. He is terrible. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Jan 24, 2020 5:03:25 GMT
its either kahia the great, agha (he is a good cav trainer tho), karamanli, platov, barclay, suchet, caradja, etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 12, 2020 21:56:28 GMT
Barcaly is not that terrible. Siege and Bugle are good skills, but skills that don’t work well together. Archuke Charles is terrible. Dearborn is not much better than barclay, if at all. Brock is a better barclay then barclay himself. Suchet and Alexander I are nowhere close to being as good as barclay. Would I buy him? No. I wouldn’t even get suvorov. But he is being roasted more than he deserves.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 12, 2020 21:58:09 GMT
My pick is holtze. Somehow, even though he is on a tier two cavarly, he absolutely dies without a fight in the hre 1798 conquest. He is on so many tiers of terrible.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marshal Forwards on Apr 13, 2020 9:14:01 GMT
My pick is holtze. Somehow, even though he is on a tier two cavarly, he absolutely dies without a fight in the hre 1798 conquest. He is on so many tiers of terrible. in my Lan-Victoria-race HRE 1798 he did his sideshow job, like the other crappy HRE gens. With some medi packs for sure. Hotze captured Bordeaux, Barcelona and Balleares, Davidovich and August I northern France, Deroy and Rosenberg defeated Poland and Denmark. It’s part of the challenge to win on 3 fronts with this bunch of dilettantes. i don’t see the point of ranking THE worst general. In which terms? In tier 1 there’re so many nameless with no skill and no stars. All cheap, but equally bad, the least cheap one is obviously the worst. But who cares about gens even a noob never considers. or are we talking about the upper end, where many but useless skills and stars can mislead a beginner to waste a lot of gold or even emblems? Napoleon or Blücher have at least a bit of quality but compared to others and cost-benefit-ratio they could be the worst. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 13, 2020 12:15:58 GMT
My pick is holtze. Somehow, even though he is on a tier two cavarly, he absolutely dies without a fight in the hre 1798 conquest. He is on so many tiers of terrible. in my Lan-Victoria-race HRE 1798 he did his sideshow job, like the other crappy HRE gens. With some medi packs for sure. Hotze captured Bordeaux, Barcelona and Balleares, Davidovich and August I northern France, Deroy and Rosenberg defeated Poland and Denmark. It’s part of the challenge to win on 3 fronts with this bunch of dilettantes. i don’t see the point of ranking THE worst general. In which terms? In tier 1 there’re so many nameless with no skill and no stars. All cheap, but equally bad, the least cheap one is obviously the worst. But who cares about gens even a noob never considers. or are we talking about the upper end, where many but useless skills and stars can mislead a beginner to waste a lot of gold or even emblems? Napoleon or Blücher have at least a bit of quality but compared to others and cost-benefit-ratio they could be the worst. Huh so you send deroy and rosenberg to poland. I usually send rosenberg and holtze to denmark, deroy to support lusignan towards istanbul. Davidovich and Klenau to spain |
|
|
|
Post by Marshal Forwards on Apr 13, 2020 14:17:33 GMT
Huh so you send deroy and rosenberg to poland. I usually send rosenberg and holtze to denmark, deroy to support lusignan towards istanbul. Davidovich and Klenau to spain Usually...? Have you ever played HRE again after achieving Lan and Victoria? I played it only two times. First, unsuccessfully, according to Kanue’s guide (no gens for Poland and Denmark). The second with a mix of Kanue’s and Antonio Luna’s guide. Denmark is passiv, so no immediate attention needed, different to Poland. Deroy and Rosenberg are closest. So the split seemed just natural. In France i separated depending on speed. August/Davidovitch (1/2 hex) do the near work, Klenau/Hotze (3hex) follow my cavalry gen to south. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 13, 2020 14:24:51 GMT
Huh so you send deroy and rosenberg to poland. I usually send rosenberg and holtze to denmark, deroy to support lusignan towards istanbul. Davidovich and Klenau to spain Usually...? Have you ever played HRE again after achieving Lan and Victoria? I played it only two times. First, unsuccessfully, according to Kanue’s guide (no gens for Poland and Denmark). The second with a mix of Kanue’s and Antonio Luna’s guide. Denmark is passiv, so no immediate attention needed, different to Poland. Deroy and Rosenberg are closest. So the split seemed just natural. In France i separated depending on speed. August/Davidovitch (1/2 hex) do the near work, Klenau/Hotze (3hex) follow my cavalry gen to south. I must admit, no haha. Only play it to get lan and victoria. Him that does sound smart. I find that waiting for suvorov and bagration to invade poland then supporting the attack is the fastest and easiest way. I typically put davout on vienna turn 1, trade off, then send him to istanbul. But I do agree, maybe deroy is worth sending to poland. My issue is that holtze is very terrible and can’t deal with denmark by himself. Denmark is really far away and a huge pain to speedrun. So sending rosenberg who actually has good movement (3 hex movement due to the horseshoe). |
|
|
|
Post by Marshal Forwards on Apr 13, 2020 14:46:39 GMT
Usually...? Have you ever played HRE again after achieving Lan and Victoria? I played it only two times. First, unsuccessfully, according to Kanue’s guide (no gens for Poland and Denmark). The second with a mix of Kanue’s and Antonio Luna’s guide. Denmark is passiv, so no immediate attention needed, different to Poland. Deroy and Rosenberg are closest. So the split seemed just natural. In France i separated depending on speed. August/Davidovitch (1/2 hex) do the near work, Klenau/Hotze (3hex) follow my cavalry gen to south. I must admit, no haha. Only play it to get lan and victoria. Him that does sound smart. I find that waiting for suvorov and bagration to invade poland then supporting the attack is the fastest and easiest way. I typically put davout on vienna turn 1, trade off, then send him to istanbul. But I do agree, maybe deroy is worth sending to poland. My issue is that holtze is very terrible and can’t deal with denmark by himself. Denmark is really far away and a huge pain to speedrun. So sending rosenberg who actually has good movement (3 hex movement due to the horseshoe). Well, any strategy that works is a good one. In the end it’s a matter of timing. All distant countries fell within 2 rounds, Turkey, Denmark, Spain. Perfect, but surely not the only way. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 13, 2020 15:20:16 GMT
I must admit, no haha. Only play it to get lan and victoria. Him that does sound smart. I find that waiting for suvorov and bagration to invade poland then supporting the attack is the fastest and easiest way. I typically put davout on vienna turn 1, trade off, then send him to istanbul. But I do agree, maybe deroy is worth sending to poland. My issue is that holtze is very terrible and can’t deal with denmark by himself. Denmark is really far away and a huge pain to speedrun. So sending rosenberg who actually has good movement (3 hex movement due to the horseshoe). Well, any strategy that works is a good one. In the end it’s a matter of timing. All distant countries fell within 2 rounds, Turkey, Denmark, Spain. Perfect, but surely not the only way. I do agree. If you have very few generals, send deroy to turkey. Otherwise, if you can afford putting a cavarly general on the tier one heavy cavarly near vienna, send deroy to poland |
|
