|
|
Post by Seger on Mar 18, 2020 18:58:53 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Mar 18, 2020 19:48:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Mar 18, 2020 19:55:25 GMT
Would be almost indisputably the best unit in the game if it wasn't ruined by that lv4 tech requirement. Way better than tanks atleast.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Mar 18, 2020 21:39:38 GMT
If tech requirement was lower, this would be too overpowered.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Mar 18, 2020 21:40:20 GMT
Would be almost indisputably the best unit in the game if it wasn't ruined by that lv4 tech requirement. Way better than tanks atleast. Yeah sure, France would spam elite units like they do in 1815... |
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Mar 18, 2020 21:59:27 GMT
Would be almost indisputably the best unit in the game if it wasn't ruined by that lv4 tech requirement. Way better than tanks atleast. Yeah sure, France would spam elite units like they do in 1815... It’s weird, France has the best units and really good generals but in most conquests their performance is pretty bad |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Mar 18, 2020 22:00:53 GMT
Yeah sure, France would spam elite units like they do in 1815... It’s weird, France has the best units and really good generals but in most conquests their performance is pretty bad Probably because they’re surrounded on three sides in 1865 and have a tiny starting army in 1914. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Mar 18, 2020 22:05:19 GMT
Yeah sure, France would spam elite units like they do in 1815... It’s weird, France has the best units and really good generals but in most conquests their performance is pretty bad This is what I don’t like about the countries’s strength. It’s pretty irregular. 1-Star countries are supposed to be weak countries that don’t do much but offer active resistance. 2-Star countries are supposed to be strong countries that can fight well and put a lot of pressure on the enemy. 3-Star countries are supposed to be very powerful countries that can send deadly armies and capture enemy territory without much difficulty. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Mar 18, 2020 22:07:44 GMT
But no, we have middle powers that feel like great powers (France 1861), great powers that feel like minor powers (Britain in any conquest that is mainly focused on Europe) and so on...
|
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Mar 19, 2020 2:44:05 GMT
I dont know about you guys but I find them rather fragile? I'd prefer relying on breastplate cav with artillery to do the job
|
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Mar 19, 2020 3:16:06 GMT
I dont know about you guys but I find them rather fragile? I'd prefer relying on breastplate cav with artillery to do the job Their defense isn’t the best. But they are extremely powerful if you put a strong cavalry general in them. Arguably the second best Cavalry unit. |
|
|
|
Post by Svetozar Boroević von Bojna on Mar 19, 2020 3:24:17 GMT
I dont know about you guys but I find them rather fragile? I'd prefer relying on breastplate cav with artillery to do the job Their defense isn’t the best. But they are extremely powerful if you put a strong cavalry general in them. Arguably the second best Cavalry unit. Whats the best then? Guard Sipahi? |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Mar 19, 2020 3:31:51 GMT
Their defense isn’t the best. But they are extremely powerful if you put a strong cavalry general in them. Arguably the second best Cavalry unit. Whats the best then? Guard Sipahi? Nope. Armored Cars. |
|
|
|
Post by Kurt von Schleicher on Mar 19, 2020 4:13:15 GMT
If Garde-kavallerie use modern rifle they will be better and that make them inferior to armored car in term of good against anything.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheAmir259 on Mar 19, 2020 5:15:54 GMT
Meh, have to rate this down sadly. It's good early game, but they don't get Rifles and movement is equal to Old Guard while being more dangerously exposed. I consider light armor to be the most disadvantaged armor as a lot of things deals massive dmg against them when compared to no armors.
|
|
