|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 25, 2020 0:26:54 GMT
I love snare drum especially when a troop has Massfire. I also love the war horse for taking strategic positions. I Also like the water hose item especially when fighting artillery and gunboats. The best combo is mass fire plus leadership. Put a general like that in a city, and he is unkillable except for with artillery. |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Apr 25, 2020 0:27:53 GMT
That is sad especially because most of his battles were won with The Grande Amrie's guns he should have more stats like explosives, seige, ballistics and movement. (I believe there is general that has these stats)
|
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Apr 25, 2020 0:31:08 GMT
Then maybe add fireproof to him or the firetruck. He would be really be Immortal plus adding economic master or the Napoleon code would provide you with tons of troops to help your General!
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 25, 2020 0:34:59 GMT
Then maybe add fireproof to him or the firetruck. He would be really be Immortal plus adding economic master or the Napoleon code would provide you with tons of troops to help your General! I wish a general like Trotsky in BJ’s ww1 mod existed. Spy, Surprise, Defense Art, Architecture. Wow! |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Apr 25, 2020 0:39:28 GMT
I enjoy the bjww1 I don't why he left the mod, he was good modder. I loved the red Barron in the mod and plus loddendorf with his rail gun was the best!
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 25, 2020 0:47:02 GMT
I enjoy the bjww1 I don't why he left the mod, he was good modder. I loved the red Barron in the mod and plus loddendorf with his rail gun was the best! That game had tons of great generals. |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Apr 25, 2020 1:17:01 GMT
I enjoy the bjww1 I don't why he left the mod, he was good modder. I loved the red Barron in the mod and plus loddendorf with his rail gun was the best! That game had tons of great generals. It did, I think if I had Apk editor and some more training I could create a new ew4 mod. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Apr 25, 2020 1:23:32 GMT
Geography is very important to me I use it in almost every strategy game I play, for example Wc3,Wc4 European war 4 and more. I also like Jolly Pixel games like Pixel Soldiers the great war. My perfect infantry general would have Economic Master, Assault art, Massfire, And Leadership. Mine would be bugle rather than econ master, you can simply strap on napoleonic code to lannes rather than getting washington. Although, if people buy washington over lannes, its probably not for that reason. Bugle here as well. If someone is getting Washington then it has to be for his training stars. Flags have huge potential but they require tons of medals, effort, and nearby units. In terms of the worth of an iap, I determine it by whether he can offer something none of the non-iaps can offer. By this standard, even Dearborn would worth it since he can deal a lot of damage as an Econ general. Afterwards it's just a matter of how much more do they worth. Poniatowski and Jervis don't count because they are navy oriented. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 25, 2020 1:46:27 GMT
Mine would be bugle rather than econ master, you can simply strap on napoleonic code to lannes rather than getting washington. Although, if people buy washington over lannes, its probably not for that reason. Bugle here as well. If someone is getting Washington then it has to be for his training stars. Flags have huge potential but they require tons of medals, effort, and nearby units. In terms of the worth of an iap, I determine it by whether he can offer something none of the non-iaps can offer. By this standard, even Dearborn would worth it since he can deal a lot of damage as an Econ general. Afterwards it's just a matter of how much more do they worth. Poniatowski and Jervis don't count because they are navy oriented. I do agree about Washington. Imo saying Poniatowski is just good on navy is incorrect. He can really do anything you need him to, and be on any unit in the game and still be very effective. If you only want to spend 6 emblems, he is an absolute steal of a buy. You want a fast and strong artillery general, Poniatowski can do a reasonably good job. Need a strong infantry general? A fast cavarly general. He just happens to be a potentially very strong naval general and can easily take the spot of someone like kate once all of the slots are filled. Once you get to the 4th movement star of his, you will have a powerful hybrid on any unit. Granted you will have to pour tons of medals into him, but it will be a very rewarding pay off. Dabrowski is still good, but Poniatowski can command every single unit and be good whereas Dabrowski can only do cavarly. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Apr 25, 2020 1:54:37 GMT
Bugle here as well. If someone is getting Washington then it has to be for his training stars. Flags have huge potential but they require tons of medals, effort, and nearby units. In terms of the worth of an iap, I determine it by whether he can offer something none of the non-iaps can offer. By this standard, even Dearborn would worth it since he can deal a lot of damage as an Econ general. Afterwards it's just a matter of how much more do they worth. Poniatowski and Jervis don't count because they are navy oriented. I do agree about Washington. Imo saying Poniatowski is just good on navy is incorrect. He can really do anything you need him to, and be on any unit in the game and still be very effective. If you only want to spend 6 emblems, he is an absolute steal of a buy. You want a fast and strong artillery general, Poniatowski can do a reasonably good job. Need a strong infantry general? A fast cavarly general. He just happens to be a potentially very strong naval general and can easily take the spot of someone like kate once all of the slots are filled. Once you get to the 4th movement star of his, you will have a powerful hybrid on any unit. Granted you will have to pour tons of medals into him, but it will be a very rewarding pay off. Dabrowski is still good, but Poniatowski can command every single unit and be good whereas Dabrowski can only do cavarly. Not saying Poniatowski is bad, but comparing to Lannes he is more navy oriented. He is probably the only case that other iaps can offer what he offers, except navy. But navy... give Kahia 5* navy and I'll call him an ok admiral. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 25, 2020 2:06:42 GMT
The closest non iap to Poniatowski’s versatility is actually Ney, who I will be doing a pretty long in depth analysis on relatively soon. The only real unit Ney is ideal for is cavarly (as we have sophia for arty and infantry Ney will be slightly above average but not great by any means). So really, Sulkowski is just Ney but better. So we really lack a strong land hybrid on land except for only Sakurako. Thus making Poniatowski a capable general to fill whatever roles the player needs him to do. Hence why I ranked him pink due to his potential. He is not as good aa Nelson on Artillery but he does have geography and can command other units to compensate. He is also equal to davout as while he hits less hard, he has leadership for protection.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 25, 2020 2:09:58 GMT
I do agree about Washington. Imo saying Poniatowski is just good on navy is incorrect. He can really do anything you need him to, and be on any unit in the game and still be very effective. If you only want to spend 6 emblems, he is an absolute steal of a buy. You want a fast and strong artillery general, Poniatowski can do a reasonably good job. Need a strong infantry general? A fast cavarly general. He just happens to be a potentially very strong naval general and can easily take the spot of someone like kate once all of the slots are filled. Once you get to the 4th movement star of his, you will have a powerful hybrid on any unit. Granted you will have to pour tons of medals into him, but it will be a very rewarding pay off. Dabrowski is still good, but Poniatowski can command every single unit and be good whereas Dabrowski can only do cavarly. Not saying Poniatowski is bad, but comparing to Lannes he is more navy oriented. He is probably the only case that other iaps can offer what he offers, except navy. But navy... give Kahia 5* navy and I'll call him an ok admiral. I do agree. Plus firefrucks do exist as items. And in addition, Lan, Sophia, and Kate would make decent admirals if given enough stars. Yes, he also costs 2 emblems more, making the user spend 8$ instead of 5$. 3$ difference between the two. The notable difference is only on infantry only, otherwise they are the same. |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Apr 25, 2020 2:20:35 GMT
Easytech should fix there slot changing thing, because you have to battle almost a whole hour to unlock new generals.( it's not bad when you don't purchase online, but when you have money online it can take you days to find the general you want to buy.)
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 25, 2020 8:48:30 GMT
Easytech should fix there slot changing thing, because you have to battle almost a whole hour to unlock new generals.( it's not bad when you don't purchase online, but when you have money online it can take you days to find the general you want to buy.) It is very annoying indeed. |
|
|
|
Post by 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘬𝘺 on Apr 25, 2020 13:39:20 GMT
Easytech should fix there slot changing thing, because you have to battle almost a whole hour to unlock new generals.( it's not bad when you don't purchase online, but when you have money online it can take you days to find the general you want to buy.) It is very annoying indeed. My tip: try Battle of Eylau from the coalition for grinding - a small map full if aggressive generals that will come to you - around round 8 you will find situations where you can kill at least two or more generals in a row - with a save like this you can force comfortable every 10 min. an academy refresh. |
|
