|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Aug 30, 2018 7:59:55 GMT
which of them would be of best use in 1975? is there a place for any of them really? Honestly, in all my runs of WC3 all of which I quit at UN, I throw navy stars onto my ECs to make them substitute Navy gens. |
|
|
|
Post by bosco on Aug 30, 2018 8:14:15 GMT
which of them would be of best use in 1975? is there a place for any of them really? Honestly, in all my runs of WC3 all of which I quit at UN, I throw navy stars onto my ECs to make them substitute Navy gens. sorry mate, don't get it. is that a yes? I thought that perfect line-up for alliens is 6 ART generals all in RA? |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 30, 2018 11:24:26 GMT
which of them would be of best use in 1975? is there a place for any of them really? You mean in aliens? Non of them honestly. Only the generals that are good at artillery or have urban fighting on tanks are good at that age. Out of all of these, id say only donitz will help out much as he can travel fast. |
|
|
|
Post by bosco on Aug 30, 2018 12:21:25 GMT
thanks, i apologiye for the OT
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Aug 30, 2018 14:23:31 GMT
Honestly, in all my runs of WC3 all of which I quit at UN, I throw navy stars onto my ECs to make them substitute Navy gens. sorry mate, don't get it. is that a yes? I thought that perfect line-up for alliens is 6 ART generals all in RA? There's not much use for a pure navy gen in 1975. You're better off avoiding aliens at sea or nuking them. Direct confrontation is usually suicidal. That's why I shared my replacement for navy gens. |
|
|
|
Post by bosco on Nov 18, 2018 17:21:22 GMT
gonna eat my own words.
HQ level 92 atm; missions at this level potentially give 4000-4800 industry, plus 1000-2000 energy or science, every 20-45 minutes (56-126 days in-game time; time reduced by wonders). having strong navy researchers helps a lot.
also, fighting aliens one conquest/day, or trying. fav nations so far Egypt and Japan. while I have good opening (i think) for Japan, not yet sure where to expand first; for now I go for Manchuria than south China, then Indochina. while land troops are doing that, Yamamoto defends homeland vs waves coming from Cuba/Bogota and Australia/islands.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeanne d'Arc on May 24, 2019 3:20:10 GMT
Nagano for Price/Performance Ratio. Same reason to get him as to get Valutin, Gororov, Auchinleck, Crerar, or Ozawa. Or any good cheap general for that matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on May 26, 2019 6:13:29 GMT
Interesting that in wc4 many people get Kuznetsov before getting Nimitz. In wc3 things work pretty differently.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeanne d'Arc on Jun 8, 2019 1:38:29 GMT
Interesting that in wc4 many people get Kuznetsov before getting Nimitz. In wc3 things work pretty differently. You probably wouldn't ever get Kuznetsov in WC3 anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jun 8, 2019 10:34:39 GMT
Interesting that in wc4 many people get Kuznetsov before getting Nimitz. In wc3 things work pretty differently. You probably wouldn't ever get Kuznetsov in WC3 anyway. Haha my emphasis was on nimitz, but im not too familiar with wc3 |
|
|
|
Post by Isoroku Yamamoto on Jul 8, 2019 10:31:43 GMT
Voted for Nagano, he has 280 health, really good choice, and not so expensive like Nimitz
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeanne d'Arc on Jul 9, 2019 16:06:24 GMT
I guess people are starting to like Nagano more.
|
|
