|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2021 14:50:31 GMT
GOG3 and EW6:1914 for the win! Just as I planned it!
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Apr 29, 2021 14:51:27 GMT
GOG3 and EW6:1914 for the win! Just as I planned it! You planned it? Then why not for EW4?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2021 15:07:35 GMT
GOG3 and EW6:1914 for the win! Just as I planned it! Yes, you are one of the best members.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2021 15:47:58 GMT
GOG3 and EW6:1914 for the win! Just as I planned it! Yes, you are one of the best members. Is that a compliment? Thank you Charles Huntziger, although I can't possibly agree with that.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2021 15:49:03 GMT
GOG3 and EW6:1914 for the win! Just as I planned it! You planned it? Then why not for EW4? I've never played EW4 so I can't really say, but I didn't like EW6:1804 and people tell me their similar so...Yeah.
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Apr 29, 2021 15:53:09 GMT
You planned it? Then why not for EW4? I've never played EW4 so I can't really say, but I didn't like EW6:1804 and people tell me their similar so...Yeah. You must try it out though. Saltin and co who were on this forum early on loved EW4 and WC3 (They are my two votes)
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Apr 29, 2021 18:30:00 GMT
You planned it? Then why not for EW4? I've never played EW4 so I can't really say, but I didn't like EW6:1804 and people tell me their similar so...Yeah. I have played both and from my point of view, 1804 is a remake that heavily improves on the original. It feels completely different, so I recommend you try it. I think some people are turned off by it being less F2P compared to newer games.
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 29, 2021 18:49:05 GMT
I've never played EW4 so I can't really say, but I didn't like EW6:1804 and people tell me their similar so...Yeah. I have played both and from my point of view, 1804 is a remake that heavily improves on the original. It feels completely different, so I recommend you try it. I think some people are turned off by it being less F2P compared to newer games. I believe 1804 is worse than the original, and HangryBird, I believe that the newer games, although fun and very well put together, are not as mind-numbingly hard as they should be, rather than F2P. Of course, the best EW is EW5.
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Apr 29, 2021 19:03:36 GMT
I have played both and from my point of view, 1804 is a remake that heavily improves on the original. It feels completely different, so I recommend you try it. I think some people are turned off by it being less F2P compared to newer games. I believe 1804 is worse than the original, and HangryBird , I believe that the newer games, although fun and very well put together, are not as mind-numbingly hard as they should be, rather than F2P. Of course, the best EW is EW5. Yeah, I like a bit of challenge and 1804 had a nice amount of difficulty in my opinion. I don't really have an opinion on EW5 since I haven't played it, but I'm turned off by it's graphics. They aren't bad in terms of quality, but the artstyle just bugs me for some reason. Agree to disagree on 1804 though.
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 29, 2021 19:10:15 GMT
I believe 1804 is worse than the original, and HangryBird , I believe that the newer games, although fun and very well put together, are not as mind-numbingly hard as they should be, rather than F2P. Of course, the best EW is EW5. Yeah, I like a bit of challenge and 1804 had a nice amount of difficulty in my opinion. I don't really have an opinion on EW5 since I haven't played it, but I'm turned off by it's graphics. They aren't bad in terms of quality, but the artstyle just bugs me for some reason. Agree to disagree on 1804 though. EW5 is a great game if you manage to ignore the several historical inaccuracies (rather semi-inaccuracies) and the graphics, which do seem cartoony.
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Apr 29, 2021 19:14:01 GMT
Yeah, I like a bit of challenge and 1804 had a nice amount of difficulty in my opinion. I don't really have an opinion on EW5 since I haven't played it, but I'm turned off by it's graphics. They aren't bad in terms of quality, but the artstyle just bugs me for some reason. Agree to disagree on 1804 though. EW5 is a great game if you manage to ignore the several historical inaccuracies (rather semi-inaccuracies) and the graphics, which do seem cartoony. Yeah, those are two things that really bug me when they aren't done right.
|
|
|
Post by zink on Apr 29, 2021 20:36:30 GMT
Yeah, I like a bit of challenge and 1804 had a nice amount of difficulty in my opinion. I don't really have an opinion on EW5 since I haven't played it, but I'm turned off by it's graphics. They aren't bad in terms of quality, but the artstyle just bugs me for some reason. Agree to disagree on 1804 though. EW5 is a great game if you manage to ignore the several historical inaccuracies (rather semi-inaccuracies) and the graphics, which do seem cartoony. I'm 100% sure it wasn't meant to be historically accurate, at all (obviously) They just tried to make as many big battles as possible and amped em up by at least 3x
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Apr 30, 2021 4:59:11 GMT
I believe 1804 is worse than the original, and HangryBird , I believe that the newer games, although fun and very well put together, are not as mind-numbingly hard as they should be, rather than F2P. Of course, the best EW is EW5. Yeah, I like a bit of challenge and 1804 had a nice amount of difficulty in my opinion. I don't really have an opinion on EW5 since I haven't played it, but I'm turned off by it's graphics. They aren't bad in terms of quality, but the artstyle just bugs me for some reason. Agree to disagree on 1804 though. Well, the graphics was the reason I didn't play EW5, but when I did tried it, it was actually pretty good. The idea of wars from different eras is amazign though
|
|
|
Post by Francisco Franco on May 8, 2021 2:15:35 GMT
Ew6 original and World conqueror 3
|
|