|
|
Post by littlecorporal on Oct 6, 2021 11:03:57 GMT
John Marston 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘬𝘺 With 20/5 Arnold I finished in R45. Not great but enough for Sophia，Maria，and Fatima. I then did 1776 France for Kate. Grinding nobility the Trotsky method up to 5 each then got me Isabella. I bought two slots and now have six generals. I tried playing with only tavern generals last week. Charles，Kutaisov，and Andrade but progress is so frustratingly slow I had to give up. I'm not sure how the first generation players here ever did it. There's a big thread on Hull I have read before! It seems like you would have to keep pouring money into the game to even have a chance. Even with tier 2 generals I would think it's a struggle to win without spending money on medals. I understand that game developers also need to eat and I guess they were able to keep the code to get Princesses hidden for long enough. So 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘬𝘺 how were you able to finally crack the Princess code? It's so great to grind nobility just a little and then BOOM Isabella shows up.
|
|
|
|
Post by 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘬𝘺 on Oct 7, 2021 11:29:40 GMT
John Marston 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘬𝘺 With 20/5 Arnold I finished in R45. Not great but enough for Sophia，Maria，and Fatima. I then did 1776 France for Kate. Grinding nobility the Trotsky method up to 5 each then got me Isabella. I bought two slots and now have six generals. I tried playing with only tavern generals last week. Charles，Kutaisov，and Andrade but progress is so frustratingly slow I had to give up. I'm not sure how the first generation players here ever did it. There's a big thread on Hull I have read before! It seems like you would have to keep pouring money into the game to even have a chance. Even with tier 2 generals I would think it's a struggle to win without spending money on medals. I understand that game developers also need to eat and I guess they were able to keep the code to get Princesses hidden for long enough. So 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘬𝘺 how were you able to finally crack the Princess code? It's so great to grind nobility just a little and then BOOM Isabella shows up. That it was so long unknown - nobody seems to had tested it once. in the five years before  I did my second european conquest quite late: 404 --- game over ?, so my run was realy easy,. I finished the conquest for just for intrest with 3 or four different scores and I noticed that 1:5 could not be the ratio for the final years, maybe 2:1? Then I prooved my theory. Looking for old postings with HRE-results and was amazed how many times, just a final trade whould have made a filed Victoria runs a sucess. With this new knowledge, I tested out that (with 404/420) 3002🔧 = Victoria, after donating two🔧 more, with: 3000🔧 = 800years. Always: 9999💰 + 9999🍖 - as I learned. This was the first key on my path to find it out all details of ruling years. |
|
|
|
Post by 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘬𝘺 on May 24, 2022 3:44:21 GMT
Hello thefamemonster, after your sucessfull HRE - maybe you want to try a France 1806 conquest. It would be great to read if for You a FR06 could be an HRE alternative - and it's a nice conquest (if you are fast enough) with more ressources than HRE |
|
|
|
Post by thefamemonster on May 24, 2022 3:54:04 GMT
Thank You! I will try it and do my best to get the required years.
I noticed from 1st to 5th tries in playing HRE, there are probabilities that a country will affect the gameplay of player.
1. There is a probability that Norway will win against Sweden. There is also a probability that Sweden will win against Norway. This is why I keep getting lost against Norway.
2. The Ottoman Empire, especially its farthest land is painful to conquer.
3. Portugal is so useless. This makes Spain another factor of contributing a loss in meeting requirements.
|
|
