|
|
Post by yuanzhong on Nov 24, 2020 7:02:08 GMT
As the title, I wonder who is the better choice ignoring the prize. (Yamashita is the best Non IAP Infantry gen IMO).
Please give your opinion.
|
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Nov 24, 2020 7:05:34 GMT
As the title, I wonder who is the better choice ignoring the prize. (Yamashita is the best Non IAP Infantry gen IMO). Please give your opinion. Mannerheim is definitely the superior price performer and the superior pure infantry general but runstedt is very bulky albeit slow and doesn't go down easily plus he can perform well on all land unit types with plunder and suppressive fire |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Nov 24, 2020 10:52:11 GMT
I think Rundstedt is better... His attack and defence are fairly balanced and he can be a decent tank or artillery general when needed... Even in naval battles he is not bad at all, even if he doesn't have a single star. His first and third skills make him an universal master of survival...
|
|
|
|
Post by yuanzhong on Nov 25, 2020 13:03:52 GMT
When it's hard to choose between them, buy both   |
|
|
|
Post by metalleater on Nov 27, 2020 19:18:58 GMT
Having studied both generals, I realized that Runstedt is much stronger. It makes no sense to buy weak generals, the number of slots in campaigns and army groups is limited. Runstedt has huge output, all 3 skills are excellent and work together. And if you need speed, take Yamashita.
|
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Nov 27, 2020 19:29:23 GMT
Having studied both generals, I realized that Runstedt is much stronger. It makes no sense to buy weak generals, the number of slots in campaigns and army groups is limited. Runstedt has huge output, all 3 skills are excellent and work together. And if you need speed, take Yamashita. I agree, Yamashita far outclasses runstedt in terms of power and speed but runstedt's survivability is like the best there is |
|
|
|
Post by metalleater on Nov 27, 2020 19:52:05 GMT
But Yamashita has only 2 skills. Samurai good for AI. But for player its useless. Сompetent player will always be well-positioned troops and keep the morale. But his plus that the price is 100 medals less.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Feb 23, 2021 15:59:07 GMT
But Yamashita has only 2 skills. Samurai good for AI. But for player its useless. Сompetent player will always be well-positioned troops and keep the morale. But his plus that the price is 100 medals less. Samurai is very good, as in this game it is very easy to fall into chaos, but I like Rundstedt's Hybridity and survivability over Yama's speed and slightly better attack... |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Feb 24, 2021 0:52:46 GMT
But Yamashita has only 2 skills. Samurai good for AI. But for player its useless. Сompetent player will always be well-positioned troops and keep the morale. But his plus that the price is 100 medals less. Yamashita has three skills. Did you know that whenever an infantry has a stack eliminated, it loses morale? Furthermore, you don't always have the luxury of being able to put your troops in a good position. Sometimes, the terrain just doesn't allow it. Samurai is a lot better than what you make it out to be. |
|
|
|
Post by Don Quixote de la Mancha on Mar 19, 2021 11:54:36 GMT
MANNERHEIM ! 100 dmg in one hit isn't nothing.
|
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 19, 2021 11:57:31 GMT
MANNERHEIM ! 100 dmg in one hit isn't nothing. Let's see him pull that of against units other than infantry. |
|
|
|
Post by Don Quixote de la Mancha on Mar 19, 2021 11:59:10 GMT
MANNERHEIM ! 100 dmg in one hit isn't nothing. Let's see him pull that of against units other than infantry. OOooof, but most infantry gens only fight against infantry anyways, except in some campaigns like 1944 |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 19, 2021 12:01:59 GMT
Let's see him pull that of against units other than infantry. OOooof, but most infantry gens only fight against infantry anyways, except in some campaigns like 1944 Limiting the use of an Infantry general to "only fight against infantry" is a waste of a unit imo. Especially considering the sheer amount of stuff infantry are capable of. |
|
|
|
Post by Don Quixote de la Mancha on Mar 19, 2021 12:06:18 GMT
OOooof, but most infantry gens only fight against infantry anyways, except in some campaigns like 1944 Limiting the use of an Infantry general to "only fight against infantry" is a waste of a unit imo. Especially considering the sheer amount of stuff infantry are capable of. True but slap a special anti-tank on that Menner and he can deal considerable dmg to tanks and slap a wiking and all arties in the area are gone (within reason) and put a White Death on him, there will be no survivors  |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 19, 2021 12:08:07 GMT
Limiting the use of an Infantry general to "only fight against infantry" is a waste of a unit imo. Especially considering the sheer amount of stuff infantry are capable of. True but slap a special anti-tank on that Menner and he can deal considerable dmg to tanks and slap a wiking and all arties in the area are gone (within reason) and put a White Death on him, there will be no survivors Same is true for many infantry generals but dat 80% damage buff against infantry is so strong! |
|
