|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Sept 23, 2021 1:27:42 GMT
Actually Tassigny is worse than Slim. Anyway Konev should be Third Infantry general not second but i prefer putting him on Artillery He been nerfed by ET *sad noises* Anyways he looks good, but he has been yeeted by Leeb and Govorov. Is Alexander better than him? His real competition is from Chuikov, who is only slightly worse as an Artillery. But we can count his Encouraged as an extra star in everything land plus Samurai (which for the Allies is irreplaceable, unlike the axis), so that increases his Value by a lot. Crossfire is always useful. Snow Fighting isn't useful at all. All in all, he is very easy to use and very recommended for any unit. |
|
|
|
Post by Manfred von Richthofen on Sept 23, 2021 1:38:14 GMT
But may i ask who will be the free generals in 1941 eastern front, 1942 pacific, 1941 north africa and the rest (1944 europe idk and 1945 pacific) 1941 East: Model (Axis), Chuikov and Timoshenko (Allies) 1942 pacific: Ozawa (Axis), Arnold (Allies) 1941 Africa: Riccardi (Axis), Alexander (allies) How about Western Europe (idk the name) 1944 and 1945 campaigns? |
|
|
|
Post by 曹操 on Sept 23, 2021 2:11:02 GMT
Actually Tassigny is worse than Slim. Anyway Konev should be Third Infantry general not second but i prefer putting him on Artillery Nah, FS1+VR > Reserve+BC+Star. Konev is quite good on all three land units. Not for tank, altho if you want to maximixe all his skill put him on Inf (So crossfire will be useful). VR kinda sucks for Tassigny especially on Offensive general |
|
|
|
Post by 曹操 on Sept 23, 2021 2:13:29 GMT
1941 East: Model (Axis), Chuikov and Timoshenko (Allies) 1942 pacific: Ozawa (Axis), Arnold (Allies) 1941 Africa: Riccardi (Axis), Alexander (allies) How about Western Europe (idk the name) 1944 and 1945 campaigns? There aren't any free gens although i hope they can give 1944: Heinrici (Axis), Devers (Allies) 1945: Yamaguchi (Axis), Halsey/Wingate (Allies) |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Sept 23, 2021 12:21:50 GMT
Nah, FS1+VR > Reserve+BC+Star. Konev is quite good on all three land units. Not for tank, altho if you want to maximixe all his skill put him on Inf (So crossfire will be useful). VR kinda sucks for Tassigny especially on Offensive general Why do you say it is bad on him? I personally think that FS alone is worth a star and Reserve, because the latter is useless, and the former is just much worse than FS, even level 1. As for VR vs BC1, I think VR is better, just because it is so easy to demoralize enemies. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Sept 23, 2021 12:23:26 GMT
How about Western Europe (idk the name) 1944 and 1945 campaigns? There aren't any free gens although i hope they can give 1944: Heinrici (Axis), Devers (Allies) 1945: Yamaguchi (Axis), Halsey/Wingate (Allies) When Wingate is dead in 1944: |
|
|
|
Post by 曹操 on Sept 23, 2021 22:25:47 GMT
There aren't any free gens although i hope they can give 1944: Heinrici (Axis), Devers (Allies) 1945: Yamaguchi (Axis), Halsey/Wingate (Allies) When Wingate is dead in 1944: No Problem at least someone will use him |
|
|
|
Post by 曹操 on Sept 23, 2021 22:28:08 GMT
Not for tank, altho if you want to maximixe all his skill put him on Inf (So crossfire will be useful). VR kinda sucks for Tassigny especially on Offensive general Why do you say it is bad on him? I personally think that FS alone is worth a star and Reserve, because the latter is useless, and the former is just much worse than FS, even level 1. As for VR vs BC1, I think VR is better, just because it is so easy to demoralize enemies. FS worth it. But Guerilla not so since he already had FS. While VR, well it mean you need to demoralize and enemy and encircle them thus lowering morale but the problem is usually enemy morale will become very low if their HP is also very so kinda useless for Tassigny who you will want to use as an offensive general |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Sept 23, 2021 23:00:07 GMT
Why do you say it is bad on him? I personally think that FS alone is worth a star and Reserve, because the latter is useless, and the former is just much worse than FS, even level 1. As for VR vs BC1, I think VR is better, just because it is so easy to demoralize enemies. FS worth it. But Guerilla not so since he already had FS. While VR, well it mean you need to demoralize and enemy and encircle them thus lowering morale but the problem is usually enemy morale will become very low if their HP is also very so kinda useless for Tassigny who you will want to use as an offensive general I view FS as Backing up Guerilla if it doesn't trigger. It is easy to flank anyone, and if you do, their morale will drop. In addition, I've found that if someone is in low morale, they are the ones to fight so you don't take as much damage. |
|
|
|
Post by 曹操 on Sept 23, 2021 23:18:56 GMT
FS worth it. But Guerilla not so since he already had FS. While VR, well it mean you need to demoralize and enemy and encircle them thus lowering morale but the problem is usually enemy morale will become very low if their HP is also very so kinda useless for Tassigny who you will want to use as an offensive general I view FS as Backing up Guerilla if it doesn't trigger. It is easy to flank anyone, and if you do, their morale will drop. In addition, I've found that if someone is in low morale, they are the ones to fight so you don't take as much damage. Yeah but that Guerilla better replaced with offensive skill (IL/BC/Terrain bonus maybe) |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Sept 23, 2021 23:31:36 GMT
I view FS as Backing up Guerilla if it doesn't trigger. It is easy to flank anyone, and if you do, their morale will drop. In addition, I've found that if someone is in low morale, they are the ones to fight so you don't take as much damage. Yeah but that Guerilla better replaced with offensive skill (IL/BC/Terrain bonus maybe) No thank you, I really, really like FS + Guerilla. |
|
