|
|
Post by eeeeef on Jan 13, 2021 3:44:33 GMT
 Stats Infantry 3 Artillery 0 Armor 2 Navy 0 Air 0 Movement 2 Skills Reserve lvl2 (extra recover +24% hp when replenishing as Infantry) Infantry Leader lvl2 (24% chance to move again when commanding Infantry) Jungle Fighting Lvl2 (+10 damage when on jungles) Price 690 |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Jan 13, 2021 3:51:00 GMT
Bradley at his peak performance!! And by that I mean good hybrid that is still overpriced and outclassed by his peers. 4 stars for decent quality and character development.
|
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Jan 13, 2021 3:57:30 GMT
 Look at how far he has come.. A tier character development right here. |
|
|
|
Post by Warlord247 on Jan 13, 2021 4:00:43 GMT
Look at how far he has come.. A tier character development right here. He was way too expensive in WC4, considering you could get Leeb, a better artillery, for less, or Guderian, the most overpowered general in that game, for 700 more |
|
|
|
Post by Warlord247 on Jan 13, 2021 4:02:57 GMT
Look at how far he has come.. A tier character development right here. He was way too expensive in WC4, considering you could get Leeb, a better artillery, for less, or Guderian, the most overpowered general in that game, for 700 more Heck, I would consider Messe a better tank general in that game, and he's over 1500 medals cheaper! |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jan 13, 2021 17:41:08 GMT
Have you all short memories?! (or is it !?) *insert appropriate Shakespeare quote*  |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jan 13, 2021 17:41:33 GMT
He was great in WC3!
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Mar 24, 2021 16:30:15 GMT
TBH, The third/second best Allied Infantry. Let's compare him to Slim
3*>4*
2* move = 2* move
Reserve = Reserve
Jungle > Bayonet lv 1
Inf Leader > Guerilla
690 < 625
I would say they are equallish. Worse defender than Vasilevsky, worse attacker than MacArthur, equal to Slim, equal (perhaps better?) to Clark. Solid choice.
|
|
|
|
Post by zink on Mar 24, 2021 18:02:08 GMT
TBH, The third/second best Allied Infantry. Let's compare him to Slim 3*>4* 2* move = 2* move Reserve = Reserve Jungle > Bayonet lv 1 Inf Leader > Guerilla 690 < 625 I would say they are equallish. Worse defender than Vasilevsky, worse attacker than MacArthur, equal to Slim, equal (perhaps better?) to Clark. Solid choice. Bruh no way Guerilla is better than Inf leader Maybe on a Cossack or Ranger but naked, nah |
|
|
|
Post by Amazing on Mar 25, 2021 4:19:10 GMT
I think without any context, (example in Conquest), Bradly, Clark and Slim are interchangeable and good 2nd Tier Infantry Generals (after MacArthur and Vasilevsky)
In terms of the Campaign, I'd rank Clark or Slim higher than Bradly as Clark is part of the general rotation in 44 and Slim in 45 and those 2 campaigns are significantly more difficult than 41 so you'd get more value out of him.
Also, Guerilla and Inf Leader is highly playstyle dependent so I wouldn't say one is better than the other. I'd personally prefer Guerilla as well but I can see the value in Inf Leader.
I put him at 3 stars because I would take him after 4 other allied infantry generals so I can't really recommend him.
|
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 25, 2021 11:25:24 GMT
I think without any context, (example in Conquest), Bradly, Clark and Slim are interchangeable and good 2nd Tier Infantry Generals (after MacArthur and Vasilevsky) In terms of the Campaign, I'd rank Clark or Slim higher than Bradly as Clark is part of the general rotation in 44 and Slim in 45 and those 2 campaigns are significantly more difficult than 41 so you'd get more value out of him. Also, Guerilla and Inf Leader is highly playstyle dependent so I wouldn't say one is better than the other. I'd personally prefer Guerilla as well but I can see the value in Inf Leader. I put him at 3 stars because I would take him after 4 other allied infantry generals so I can't really recommend him. What about Tassigny? I'd say he outclasses Bradley and Clark while being only very slightly worse than Slim. |
|
|
|
Post by Amazing on Mar 25, 2021 13:31:13 GMT
I think without any context, (example in Conquest), Bradly, Clark and Slim are interchangeable and good 2nd Tier Infantry Generals (after MacArthur and Vasilevsky) In terms of the Campaign, I'd rank Clark or Slim higher than Bradly as Clark is part of the general rotation in 44 and Slim in 45 and those 2 campaigns are significantly more difficult than 41 so you'd get more value out of him. Also, Guerilla and Inf Leader is highly playstyle dependent so I wouldn't say one is better than the other. I'd personally prefer Guerilla as well but I can see the value in Inf Leader. I put him at 3 stars because I would take him after 4 other allied infantry generals so I can't really recommend him. What about Tassigny? I'd say he outclasses Bradley and Clark while being only very slightly worse than Slim. I like Tassigny more than Bradley. Out of the 4 I chose Clark because I needed Amphibious to perfect clear 2 missions in 44. But to me they are all on an equal Tier level and whoever you choose is not going to make a huge difference in lets say Conquest Mode. I'd probably go Slim, Clark, Tassigny and Bradley in that order however |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Mar 25, 2021 13:35:57 GMT
What about Tassigny? I'd say he outclasses Bradley and Clark while being only very slightly worse than Slim. I like Tassigny more than Bradley. Out of the 4 I chose Clark because I needed Amphibious to perfect clear 2 missions in 44. But to me they are all on an equal Tier level and whoever you choose is not going to make a huge difference in lets say Conquest Mode. I'd probably go Slim, Clark, Tassigny and Bradley in that order however May I have some advice. I am at '44 Marching to Italy, with MacArthur, Vatutin, Badoglio, Rundstedt, and Rommel, and I am trying to Decide between Bradley and Clark. Which would you advise for me? I honestly prefer Brad to Slim, although both are good. Which would you rather me get, as you have done '44 and '45? Bradley? Or Clark? |
|
|
|
Post by Amazing on Mar 25, 2021 13:45:12 GMT
I like Tassigny more than Bradley. Out of the 4 I chose Clark because I needed Amphibious to perfect clear 2 missions in 44. But to me they are all on an equal Tier level and whoever you choose is not going to make a huge difference in lets say Conquest Mode. I'd probably go Slim, Clark, Tassigny and Bradley in that order however May I have some advice. I am at '44 Marching to Italy, with MacArthur, Vatutin, Badoglio, Rundstedt, and Rommel, and I am trying to Decide between Bradley and Clark. Which would you advise for me? I honestly prefer Brad to Slim, although both are good. Which would you rather me get, as you have done '44 and '45? Bradley? Or Clark? Get Clark, He has Amphibious. He makes the 2 hardest missions in 44 (Marching to Italy/Normandy Landing) so much easier because Amphibious allows you to attack Salerno/the coastal city in Normandy). He also lets you farm medals in 44. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Mar 25, 2021 13:53:04 GMT
May I have some advice. I am at '44 Marching to Italy, with MacArthur, Vatutin, Badoglio, Rundstedt, and Rommel, and I am trying to Decide between Bradley and Clark. Which would you advise for me? I honestly prefer Brad to Slim, although both are good. Which would you rather me get, as you have done '44 and '45? Bradley? Or Clark? Get Clark, He has Amphibious. He makes the 2 hardest missions in 44 (Marching to Italy/Normandy Landing) so much easier because Amphibious allows you to attack Salerno/the coastal city in Normandy). He also lets you farm medals in 44. Thank you! Is he good in '45, too? |
|
