Historical Society Applications

[...] Communism on its own would most likely be heavily affected, as it could only rise due to the révolution, which was sparked by Russia losing the war and having no more supplies, which would be fixed in this alterante reality. Of course, the revolution would still most likely happen. This is because WW1 was merely the trigger to the revolution. There were also a huge number of extra reasons, that had been boiling for years. If not then, then maybe later, but the revolution would still most likely happen. But maybe it wouldn't be communism which would rise to power, but democracy? I have no idea. But communism would most likely not even start to spread, as it was mainly thanks to Lenin that it started in Russia.

[...] because WW1 revolution was a golden opportunity for the Bolsheviks to take over. If this revolution didn't even happen, because Russia was receiving enough supplies, support and military help to win the war, then the Bolsheviks couldn't have staged their coup. Another opportunity like this wouldn't occur until 1939, when WW2 came along, or possibly 1929, the great bank crash. Sadly, the main character in communism, mr Vladimir Lenin, was already dead by then, meaning that Communism wouldn't have spread as it did in our timeline. Or atleast not in Russia. (As i've said, this is a what-if scenario, so anything could've happened. I'm merely going by the events which did happen in our timeline.) The reason why I have this tought, is because if Lenin died, there were really only 2 people who could've taken over: Stalin or Trotsky. Stalin was never a good leader, and would have not been able to organize the CCCP in it's early years (we all know how deals with wars and conflicts). The other option, Trotsky, would've been a better pick, but he didn't have the leader skills Lenin did. He was more of a military strategist. So, either way, the CCCP wouldn't have been able to become as influential and important as in our timeline. (I really hope this was the right answer )

Sorry Captain , but as you see is Gerd von Rundstedt busy at the moment.
I noticed your request, you do your interview - do we have your links ?

I'm sorry I'm only on mobile and could not follow all in the recent time.

[...] Communism on its own would most likely be heavily affected, as it could only rise due to the révolution, which was sparked by Russia losing the war and having no more supplies, which would be fixed in this alterante reality. Of course, the revolution would still most likely happen. This is because WW1 was merely the trigger to the revolution. There were also a huge number of extra reasons, that had been boiling for years. If not then, then maybe later, but the revolution would still most likely happen. But maybe it wouldn't be communism which would rise to power, but democracy? I have no idea. But communism would most likely not even start to spread, as it was mainly thanks to Lenin that it started in Russia.

[...] because WW1 revolution was a golden opportunity for the Bolsheviks to take over. If this revolution didn't even happen, because Russia was receiving enough supplies, support and military help to win the war, then the Bolsheviks couldn't have staged their coup. Another opportunity like this wouldn't occur until 1939, when WW2 came along, or possibly 1929, the great bank crash. Sadly, the main character in communism, mr Vladimir Lenin, was already dead by then, meaning that Communism wouldn't have spread as it did in our timeline. Or atleast not in Russia. (As i've said, this is a what-if scenario, so anything could've happened. I'm merely going by the events which did happen in our timeline.) The reason why I have this tought, is because if Lenin died, there were really only 2 people who could've taken over: Stalin or Trotsky. Stalin was never a good leader, and would have not been able to organize the CCCP in it's early years (we all know how deals with wars and conflicts). The other option, Trotsky, would've been a better pick, but he didn't have the leader skills Lenin did. He was more of a military strategist. So, either way, the CCCP wouldn't have been able to become as influential and important as in our timeline. (I really hope this was the right answer )

Thought i'd log into EFC, saw I had 16 notifs :/. But about your question. I dont think I've heard this name before. It may be the russian equivalent of an English name I do know, but I have absolutely no idea XD.