|
|
Post by littlecorporal on Feb 1, 2021 1:38:42 GMT
What is the top 4 general team of mid tier generals?
Golitsyin, Scharnhorst, Oudinot, and Ney?
It seems like it would be weak on naval campaigns.
|
|
|
|
Post by ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ on Feb 1, 2021 3:05:05 GMT
And what is with Sulkowski ? He can be the only General that I would buy for combat. Maybe. 3 Schields. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Feb 1, 2021 3:35:53 GMT
And what is with Sulkowski ? He can be the only General that I would buy for combat. Maybe. 3 Schields. Oudinot can be replaced by Dobeln I think. |
|
|
|
Post by ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ on Feb 1, 2021 4:55:22 GMT
And what is with Sulkowski ? He can be the only General that I would buy for combat. Maybe. 3 Schields. Oudinot can be replaced by Dobeln I think. Infantry generals? Pure ones ? For what, if you have limited slots? |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Feb 1, 2021 4:58:16 GMT
Oudinot can be replaced by Dobeln I think. Infantry generals? Pure ones ? For what, if you have limited slots? Is Oudinot hybrid? I didn't know that. But what is the need of hybrids when you have specialists? |
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Feb 1, 2021 5:05:32 GMT
Infantry generals? Pure ones ? For what, if you have limited slots? Is Oudinot hybrid? I didn't know that. But what is the need of hybrids when you have specialists? In case you don't have the ideal starting set up in Campaigns or the money needed for it. Same reason why Sakurako is given some consideration because she can be deployed on all types of land units. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Feb 1, 2021 5:09:47 GMT
Is Oudinot hybrid? I didn't know that. But what is the need of hybrids when you have specialists? In case you don't have the ideal starting set up in Campaigns or the money needed for it. Same reason why Sakurako is given some consideration because she can be deployed on all types of land units. I think Hybrids are really useful in the American Campaign. Because to find the best units for all generals will be difficult there and not quite worth the price for the other campaigns as they have a good economy and suitable starting troops too. |
|
|
|
Post by littlecorporal on Feb 1, 2021 9:41:48 GMT
Is Oudinot out and Sulkowski in? I think Oudinot is better because of movement and training, Dobeln's mass fire can be substituted by the snare drum. Is Ushakov another choice instead of Oudinot?
|
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Feb 1, 2021 13:39:51 GMT
Is Oudinot out and Sulkowski in? I think Oudinot is better because of movement and training, Dobeln's mass fire can be substituted by the snare drum. Is Ushakov another choice instead of Oudinot? I still go for Dobeln. Also littlecorporal, this excludes Princesses I assume. The problem if you replace Oudinot with Ushakov is that you won't have an infantry general. |
|
|
|
Post by ks on Feb 1, 2021 14:10:36 GMT
You could do Yermolov, Sulkowski, Scharnhorst, and Golytsin if having an infantry general is that important. Replace Yermolov with Ushakov if you value navy more
|
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Feb 1, 2021 14:14:58 GMT
You could do Yermolov, Sulkowski, Scharnhorst, and Golytsin if having an infantry general is that important. Replace Yermolov with Ushakov if you value navy more I think that Dobeln just lost his place as the best Infantry mid tier general lol. I think that Yermolov can be replaced with Ushakov as he is an hybrid. Or in place of Sulkowski as you already have a cavalry general, which is not advisable. |
|
|
|
Post by littlecorporal on Feb 2, 2021 12:00:52 GMT
Its an interesting problem. Versatility is important right? Is Golitsyin for sure? He is great on cavalry but useless on other units. The mid tier generals have a lot of specialists, like Golitsyin, Scharnhorst, and Oudinot/ Dobeln and some good dual use hybrids- Ushakov, Sidney, Yermolov, Collingwood. Ney seems like the most obvious choice as a hybrid.
|
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Feb 2, 2021 12:14:07 GMT
Its an interesting problem. Versatility is important right? Is Golitsyin for sure? He is great on cavalry but useless on other units. The mid tier generals have a lot of specialists, like Golitsyin, Scharnhorst, and Oudinot/ Dobeln and some good dual use hybrids- Ushakov, Sidney, Yermolov, Collingwood. Ney seems like the most obvious choice as a hybrid. Yeah. Golitsyn for sure. Or we could pick three land specialists with a navy/artillery hybrid, for which Ushakov is perfect for the last slot. |
|
|
|
Post by ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ on Feb 2, 2021 17:45:53 GMT
For the campaign is the versatility of the team the key. 5 let's say 10 Navy missions are not enough to have an pure Admiral.
Imo is it better, to be weak in 10 naval missions, than having in 70 missions an Admiral on land.
A conquest team can be set up with specialized generals, depending on personal preference.
IE: I never use a hq infantry general in conquests. Imo: Infantry has too bad units - cheap and nice for starting and learning. (infants of the war game). I play C - A - C/A
Is there a conquest where an admiral instad a land general is recommended ? I don't think so, not in Europe.
|
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Feb 3, 2021 1:28:28 GMT
For the campaign is the versatility of the team the key. 5 let's say 10 Navy missions are not enough to have an pure Admiral. Imo is it better, to be weak in 10 naval missions, than having in 70 missions an Admiral on land. A conquest team can be set up with specialized generals, depending on personal preference. IE: I never use a hq infantry general in conquests. Imo: Infantry has too bad units - cheap and nice for starting and learning. (infants of the war game). I play C - A - C/A Is there a conquest where an admiral instad a land general is recommended ? I don't think so, not in Europe. But why are infantry generals not recommended? Ok I admit that I am still new to the game. Is it because they deal less damage than artillery? or because they can't do range attack? or because they cant move after their killing the enemy like the cavalry? |
|
