|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2021 19:31:41 GMT
Bruh, are you dull? The whole basis of the Antarctic War campaign isn't a Nazi victory, rather a last ditch effort by the Nazis to survive! This is an alternate history in which at the end of the war the Nazis flee to Antarctica. Still, if you want to do an alternate Endsieg if you will, why not an Argentina campaign or something like that? Please read before you post. I literally just said earlier in the thread that the idea of Nazis in Antarctica is based on one last stand. It isn't alternate history when it ignores any semblance of reality. How would the Nazis even manage to transport large amounts of troops and supplies to Antarctica with the Allies tightening the noose around their neck? Would a significant amount of Nazis even be willing to make the trip? Again, I'll repeat it, so no one is bothering to refute it: the Nazis actually have a reason to invade North America, but have no reason to be in Antarctica in the first place. An Argentina campaign is an even worse idea. The idea that the Nazis somehow manage to take over Argentina for one last stand is ludicrous. They would face less resistance in Antarctica. Now, I'll again defend easytech's man in the high castle scenario. The Nazis take over the entirety of Europe first in order to defeat the Allies that are directly threatening them and secure more resources. Then, with Europe secure, the Nazis feel confident enough to bring the fight to North America. There is actually a semblance of reality in this scenario, unlike in Antarctica. Please demonstrate an ability to read before you use personal attacks like calling people dull. I apologize. I see what you mean now, and I'll be more careful to read fully befor I reply to posts. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2021 19:35:00 GMT
Bruh, are you dull? The whole basis of the Antarctic War campaign isn't a Nazi victory, rather a last ditch effort by the Nazis to survive! This is an alternate history in which at the end of the war the Nazis flee to Antarctica. Still, if you want to do an alternate Endsieg if you will, why not an Argentina campaign or something like that? Please read before you post. I literally just said earlier in the thread that the idea of Nazis in Antarctica is based on one last stand. It isn't alternate history when it ignores any semblance of reality. How would the Nazis even manage to transport large amounts of troops and supplies to Antarctica with the Allies tightening the noose around their neck? Would a significant amount of Nazis even be willing to make the trip? Again, I'll repeat it, so no one is bothering to refute it: the Nazis actually have a reason to invade North America, but have no reason to be in Antarctica in the first place. An Argentina campaign is an even worse idea. The idea that the Nazis somehow manage to take over Argentina for one last stand is ludicrous. They would face less resistance in Antarctica. Now, I'll again defend easytech's man in the high castle scenario. The Nazis take over the entirety of Europe first in order to defeat the Allies that are directly threatening them and secure more resources. Then, with Europe secure, the Nazis feel confident enough to bring the fight to North America. There is actually a semblance of reality in this scenario, unlike in Antarctica. Please demonstrate an ability to read before you use personal attacks like calling people dull. Although, I must point out one thing that you all seemed to disregard... THERE IS A NORTH AMERICA CAMPAIGN, KIND OF!!!!!! (Pacific 45). |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Feb 25, 2021 19:39:53 GMT
Please read before you post. I literally just said earlier in the thread that the idea of Nazis in Antarctica is based on one last stand. It isn't alternate history when it ignores any semblance of reality. How would the Nazis even manage to transport large amounts of troops and supplies to Antarctica with the Allies tightening the noose around their neck? Would a significant amount of Nazis even be willing to make the trip? Again, I'll repeat it, so no one is bothering to refute it: the Nazis actually have a reason to invade North America, but have no reason to be in Antarctica in the first place. An Argentina campaign is an even worse idea. The idea that the Nazis somehow manage to take over Argentina for one last stand is ludicrous. They would face less resistance in Antarctica. Now, I'll again defend easytech's man in the high castle scenario. The Nazis take over the entirety of Europe first in order to defeat the Allies that are directly threatening them and secure more resources. Then, with Europe secure, the Nazis feel confident enough to bring the fight to North America. There is actually a semblance of reality in this scenario, unlike in Antarctica. Please demonstrate an ability to read before you use personal attacks like calling people dull. Although, I must point out one thing that you all seemed to disregard... THERE IS A NORTH AMERICA CAMPAIGN, KIND OF!!!!!! (Pacific 45). That's what I meant by easytech's man in the high castle scenario. That part of the campaign is why this debate started in the first place. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2021 19:43:11 GMT
Although, I must point out one thing that you all seemed to disregard... THERE IS A NORTH AMERICA CAMPAIGN, KIND OF!!!!!! (Pacific 45). That's what I meant by easytech's man in the high castle scenario. That part of the campaign is why this debate started in the first place. But why continue? They basically cover the defeat of North American Allies in that campaign. Maybe an alternative would be an Axis civil war sort of thing. (Germany vs. Japan for world domination). I'd honestly love to play that, you could Have a Nazi campaign and a Japanese Campaign. |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Feb 25, 2021 19:53:06 GMT
That's what I meant by easytech's man in the high castle scenario. That part of the campaign is why this debate started in the first place. But why continue? They basically cover the defeat of North American Allies in that campaign. Maybe an alternative would be an Axis civil war sort of thing. (Germany vs. Japan for world domination). I'd honestly love to play that, you could Have a Nazi campaign and a Japanese Campaign. I'm not saying easytech should continue their Axis victory scenario. I was just arguing it's more realistic than their Nazi Antarctica scenario that will definitely come in the future. Speaking of that scenario, I don't see how easytech would implement an axis campaign in Antarctica. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2021 19:57:30 GMT
But why continue? They basically cover the defeat of North American Allies in that campaign. Maybe an alternative would be an Axis civil war sort of thing. (Germany vs. Japan for world domination). I'd honestly love to play that, you could Have a Nazi campaign and a Japanese Campaign. I'm not saying easytech should continue their Axis victory scenario. I was just arguing it's more realistic than their Nazi Antarctica scenario that will definitely come in the future. Speaking of that scenario, I don't see how easytech would implement an axis campaign in Antarctica. IMO a cold war campaign would be smarter. I get that the game is WWII based, but I think a Cold War campaign would attract a lot of interest, although with the risk of turning GOG3 into WC4. |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Feb 25, 2021 20:04:46 GMT
I'm not saying easytech should continue their Axis victory scenario. I was just arguing it's more realistic than their Nazi Antarctica scenario that will definitely come in the future. Speaking of that scenario, I don't see how easytech would implement an axis campaign in Antarctica. IMO a cold war campaign would be smarter. I get that the game is WWII based, but I think a Cold War campaign would attract a lot of interest, although with the risk of turning GOG3 into WC4. Yeah, it's true that it would make the game more interesting to more people. Also, you just pointed out why I don't want a cold war campaign. It would strip GoG3 of its own identity by making it look and feel too similar to WC4. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Feb 26, 2021 23:45:44 GMT
Yeah, it's true that it would make the game more interesting to more people. Also, you just pointed out why I don't want a cold war campaign. It would strip GoG3 of its own identity by making it look and feel too similar to WC4. I would hate Cold War. Although it is possible that they would do a Korean War and a Middle East war, like GOG:P. I wouldn't fight that nearly as badly. Nazis in Antarctica is not good at all, but you have to admit that it is better than Aliens or Terrorists. Honestly, I was thinking of modding WC4 and removing that, but I didn't know how to. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2021 15:27:47 GMT
Yeah, it's true that it would make the game more interesting to more people. Also, you just pointed out why I don't want a cold war campaign. It would strip GoG3 of its own identity by making it look and feel too similar to WC4. I would hate Cold War. Although it is possible that they would do a Korean War and a Middle East war, like GOG:P. I wouldn't fight that nearly as badly. Nazis in Antarctica is not good at all, but you have to admit that it is better than Aliens or Terrorists. Honestly, I was thinking of modding WC4 and removing that, but I didn't know how to. Honestly, I think there is no need for another campiagn at all. I mean, you already covered all scenerios of WWII, so why not just end it there? If you want to do more, Make a GOG4 and do a modern war scenerio or something. |
|
