|
|
Post by eeeeef on Apr 13, 2021 16:33:20 GMT
It's simple, roll a coin 2 times and you'll mostly get a heads and a tails, now attack an enemy more than once and you're bound to see raider trigger more often. Yes, but Rundstedt doesn't have Raider? Also, is the vote for Yamashita or Kesselring? Is Guderian super helpful in Pacific war? I feel like he could be a Patton Killer, or a good Heavy Tank Destroyer. Yamashita 200% also both Guderian and Yamashita are monsters and the best in their respective fields, Yamashita is the best infantry general in general and Guderian is the undeniable kind of medium tanks by a long shot. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 13, 2021 16:38:19 GMT
Yes, but Rundstedt doesn't have Raider? Also, is the vote for Yamashita or Kesselring? Is Guderian super helpful in Pacific war? I feel like he could be a Patton Killer, or a good Heavy Tank Destroyer. Yamashita 200% also both Guderian and Yamashita are monsters and the best in their respective fields, Yamashita is the best infantry general in general and Guderian is the undeniable kind of medium tanks by a long shot. Is Guderian still good on Heavies, though? I don't have him, and I would like an Air general, but if you think I should get a third infantry (Have Model and Rundstedt) for the Axis. I am thinking of Getting Guderian to kill angry Heavy tanks. Right now my second heavy tanker is Bock, but if I get Guderian it would be him. |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Apr 13, 2021 16:43:16 GMT
Yamashita 200% also both Guderian and Yamashita are monsters and the best in their respective fields, Yamashita is the best infantry general in general and Guderian is the undeniable kind of medium tanks by a long shot. Is Guderian still good on Heavies, though? I don't have him, and I would like an Air general, but if you think I should get a third infantry (Have Model and Rundstedt) for the Axis. I am thinking of Getting Guderian to kill angry Heavy tanks. Guderian is still a power house on heavies although he is worse than Rommel when dealing with infantry, model at late game becomes pretty outdated and I'd say Yamashita far exceeds both him and gerdy so getting him will be a worthwhile investment, also Yamashita and Guderian are excellent "Boss killers" although I'd say that Leeb and Badoglio are the best at dealing with buff hard hitting foes Yamashita and Guderian are very good at this kinda job too and along with their speed they can easily outpace the 2 artillerist and make securing objectives easier. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 13, 2021 16:46:42 GMT
Is Guderian still good on Heavies, though? I don't have him, and I would like an Air general, but if you think I should get a third infantry (Have Model and Rundstedt) for the Axis. I am thinking of Getting Guderian to kill angry Heavy tanks. Guderian is still a power house on heavies although he is worse than Rommel when dealing with infantry, model at late game becomes pretty outdated and I'd say Yamashita far exceeds both him and gerdy so getting him will be a worthwhile investment, also Yamashita and Guderian are excellent "Boss killers" although I'd say that Leeb and Badoglio are the best at dealing with buff hard hitting foes Yamashita and Guderian are very good at this kinda job too and along with their speed they can easily outpace the 2 artillerist and make securing objectives easier. Not getting Yamashita. I am very happy with Rundstedt and have abused save/load. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Apr 13, 2021 16:50:26 GMT
And what do You need air gen for?
|
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Apr 13, 2021 16:50:32 GMT
Guderian is still a power house on heavies although he is worse than Rommel when dealing with infantry, model at late game becomes pretty outdated and I'd say Yamashita far exceeds both him and gerdy so getting him will be a worthwhile investment, also Yamashita and Guderian are excellent "Boss killers" although I'd say that Leeb and Badoglio are the best at dealing with buff hard hitting foes Yamashita and Guderian are very good at this kinda job too and along with their speed they can easily outpace the 2 artillerist and make securing objectives easier. Not getting Yamashita. I am very happy with Rundstedt and have abused save/load. Darn! It seems like "Bias Barrier" is too strong for me to successfully bypass with good logic! I'll have to up my Charisma and persuasion stats for me to even put a dent in it. |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Apr 13, 2021 16:50:51 GMT
And what do You need air gen for? For air strikes duh-doy. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 13, 2021 16:51:47 GMT
And what do You need air gen for? Destroying everything in sight. I use air a ton, actually. But however, I do personally fine without an air gen. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Apr 13, 2021 16:57:39 GMT
eeeeef , Gerd von Rundstedt I was trying to recall how many missions I massively used air. It was either one or two where I had enough funds to bomb it in a way that it secured perfect victory. In most cases I rely on either field gens or non-gens spam. I am actually very sceprical about air-strikes. Fog of war limits the possibility to use it in time it could really help You. Bringing air gen to the airport on the frontline normally results in his death at AI's phase of the turn. And keeping it on a rear airfied makes me feel I am wasting my firepower capacity.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 13, 2021 17:18:17 GMT
eeeeef , Gerd von Rundstedt I was trying to recall how many missions I massively used air. It was either one or two where I had enough funds to bomb it in a way that it secured perfect victory. In most cases I rely on either field gens or non-gens spam. I am actually very sceprical about air-strikes. Fog of war limits the possibility to use it in time it could really help You. Bringing air gen to the airport on the frontline normally results in his death at AI's phase of the turn. And keeping it on a rear airfied makes me feel I am wasting my firepower capacity. I spam air in 75% of campaigns. It can't lower the HP of my troops, and it is far reaching. In addition, I almost always have the funds 5o do so. |
|
|
|
Post by irvin on Apr 13, 2021 17:33:16 GMT
Air general in experience needed only for naval missions
I use Kesserling, and he is my second option for inf in Missions
Not a perfect option, but I try to use him on surrounded troops , where he delivers +12 dmg
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 13, 2021 17:33:25 GMT
So Kesselring?
|
|
|
|
Post by irvin on Apr 13, 2021 17:48:47 GMT
If you have Kesserling for Axis , you’ll never miss another air general whatever the situation
Damage bonus is always working in case enemy has low morale, with air attack too
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 13, 2021 17:50:08 GMT
If you have Kesserling for Axis , you’ll never miss another air general whatever the situation Damage bonus is always working in case enemy has low morale, with air attack too Victory Rush works with air? I'm sure you are mistaken. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Apr 13, 2021 17:57:14 GMT
eeeeef , Gerd von Rundstedt I was trying to recall how many missions I massively used air. It was either one or two where I had enough funds to bomb it in a way that it secured perfect victory. In most cases I rely on either field gens or non-gens spam. I am actually very sceprical about air-strikes. Fog of war limits the possibility to use it in time it could really help You. Bringing air gen to the airport on the frontline normally results in his death at AI's phase of the turn. And keeping it on a rear airfied makes me feel I am wasting my firepower capacity. I spam air in 75% of campaigns. It can't lower the HP of my troops, and it is far reaching. In addition, I almost always have the funds 5o do so. Is it cost efficient? I mean air strike is pricy and deals not that much damage even with air-gen. For same price You can send Guderian on a tank and deliver much more damage. At least I feel like that. I normally use it for the points I can't reach. But it is not that common. |
|
