|
|
Post by HangryBird on Mar 12, 2021 17:08:56 GMT
I recall many were fascinated by Mannerheim and Yamashita in WC4. But actually there were some bad omens right from the start. Especially amazingly low HP in comparison to tanks... But its WC4, where all you need are tank gens + one artillery gen. Infantry gens were useless in that game. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Mar 12, 2021 17:11:02 GMT
I recall many were fascinated by Mannerheim and Yamashita in WC4. But actually there were some bad omens right from the start. Especially amazingly low HP in comparison to tanks... But its WC4, where all you need are tank gens + one artillery gen. Infantry gens were useless in that game. As I said it wasn't that obvious by the time. Before Modern war update many players used Infantry and were quite happy... |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Mar 12, 2021 17:17:22 GMT
But its WC4, where all you need are tank gens + one artillery gen. Infantry gens were useless in that game. As I said it wasn't that obvious by the time. Before Modern war update many players used Infantry and were quite happy... Oh, when you said "from the start", I thought you meant at the start of the game, not at the release of the game. I played WC4 after modern war update. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Mar 12, 2021 17:33:20 GMT
As I said it wasn't that obvious by the time. Before Modern war update many players used Infantry and were quite happy... Oh, when you said "from the start", I thought you meant at the start of the game, not at the release of the game. I played WC4 after modern war update. Yet I think we should have a plan or a picture at the start of each Et game too. It was a painful experience of many players that proved that Infantry hasn't any future in WC4. We still are lacking similar experience in GoG3 3, since we can only speculate about a future update. And I wouldn't exclude some nasty surprises as well. On a positive side there are not so many good generals in the game to make a critical mistake  |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Mar 12, 2021 17:53:47 GMT
Yeah, in WC4 there was a possibility to choose either plain fighting or rumour  |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Mar 12, 2021 20:27:15 GMT
Yeah, in WC4 there was a possibility to choose either plain fighting or rumour We don't know unfortunately how successful were those with Plain fighting |
|
|
|
Post by journeykeen on Mar 13, 2021 1:42:20 GMT
PF is only useful in 1943 and 39’ 3 star conquests where health is jo issue, so the extra damage can be impactful.
In 1 Star countries and 1950 and 80’, enemies have enough health and there are too few of you for rumor to not be worth it.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Mar 13, 2021 17:22:07 GMT
PF is only useful in 1943 and 39’ 3 star conquests where health is jo issue, so the extra damage can be impactful. In 1 Star countries and 1950 and 80’, enemies have enough health and there are too few of you for rumor to not be worth it. Yeah, it was sarcasm. We had quite intense debate with one of the players who was sure that PF is way better ) That was before the last update of course. |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Mar 13, 2021 19:01:26 GMT
PF is only useful in 1943 and 39’ 3 star conquests where health is jo issue, so the extra damage can be impactful. In 1 Star countries and 1950 and 80’, enemies have enough health and there are too few of you for rumor to not be worth it. Yeah, it was sarcasm. We had quite intense debate with one of the players who was sure that PF is way better ) That was before the last update of course. I'm of the mind that terrain skills are too situational, so I'd take rumor any day. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Mar 23, 2021 17:30:48 GMT
Golly, I get that they are working on EW5, but they are taking long enough!
|
|
