|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2021 17:10:54 GMT
Yes, I know forums similar to this exist, but I want a firsthand opinion.
I am stuck on Dnieper Offensive, need an Aliied tank but can't decide which one to choose.
I have 888 medals.
What do you guys think?
|
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 8, 2021 17:12:43 GMT
Definitely not Vatutin.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2021 17:13:57 GMT
Would you mind expanding on that, eeeeef? |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Mar 8, 2021 17:15:47 GMT
Yes, I know forums similar to this exist, but I want a firsthand opinion. I am stuck on Dnieper Offensive, need an Aliied tank but can't decide which one to choose. I have 888 medals. What do you guys think? Vatutin, he is the cheapest, and has the best skills. He also has better stars than Rokossovsky. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2021 17:19:59 GMT
I am considering each for the following reasons:
Monty: best output, best damage, air stars could come in handy
Roko: best for KV-6, best skills
Vat: Cheap, good for KV-6, nice damage
|
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 8, 2021 18:16:57 GMT
Would you mind expanding on that, eeeeef? When considering optimal endgame lineups and the best candidate for the KV-6 Mocty and Roko easily outclass Vatutin imo. 1. They have 2 vital skills for heavy tank generals, Machinist and Panzer Leader. 2. They have superior movement, enough said. 3. The next update will have an upgrade system, the higher the general rank the more times they can be upgraded, this means Vatutin has inferior potential compared to Mocty and Roko. |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Mar 8, 2021 18:42:23 GMT
Would you mind expanding on that, eeeeef ? When considering optimal endgame lineups and the best candidate for the KV-6 Mocty and Roko easily outclass Vatutin imo. 1. They have 2 vital skills for heavy tank generals, Machinist and Panzer Leader. 2. They have superior movement, enough said. 3. The next update will have an upgrade system, the higher the general rank the more times they can be upgraded, this means Vatutin has inferior potential compared to Mocty and Roko. 1. Vatutin is better on medium tanks because he doesn't have the skins you listed, which are what makes a good KV-6 gen. 2. Honestly, tank generals don't need to be fast. I don't know why you all put such a heavy emphasis on fast-moving tank gens. Tanks with no special forces nor gens on them already have a lot of movement. 3. Huh, that's a good point. The amount of stars allotted to a general probably correlate to the rank of the general. However, it depends on how powerful stars are. Then again, this is easytech, they will probably make stars powerful. Personally, I think Monty > Vatutin > Roko in terms of price performance. |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 8, 2021 18:47:15 GMT
When considering optimal endgame lineups and the best candidate for the KV-6 Mocty and Roko easily outclass Vatutin imo. 1. They have 2 vital skills for heavy tank generals, Machinist and Panzer Leader. 2. They have superior movement, enough said. 3. The next update will have an upgrade system, the higher the general rank the more times they can be upgraded, this means Vatutin has inferior potential compared to Mocty and Roko. 1. Vatutin is better on medium tanks because he doesn't have the skins you listed, which are what makes a good KV-6 gen. 2. Honestly, tank generals don't need to be fast. I don't know why you all put such a heavy emphasis on fast-moving tank gens. Tanks with no special forces nor gens on them already have a lot of movement. 3. Huh, that's a good point. The amount of stars allotted to a general probably correlate to the rank of the general. However, it depends on how powerful stars are. Then again, this is easytech, they will probably make stars powerful. Personally, I think Monty > Vatutin > Roko in terms of price performance. 1. Yes vatutin has the oh so slightest advantage when on medium tanks but I was focusing on an optimal endgame lineup, why bother with Vatutin when Patton can be your melee guy? 2. Yes this is kinda biased but movement is the best star in the game imo. |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Mar 8, 2021 18:54:10 GMT
1. Vatutin is better on medium tanks because he doesn't have the skins you listed, which are what makes a good KV-6 gen. 2. Honestly, tank generals don't need to be fast. I don't know why you all put such a heavy emphasis on fast-moving tank gens. Tanks with no special forces nor gens on them already have a lot of movement. 3. Huh, that's a good point. The amount of stars allotted to a general probably correlate to the rank of the general. However, it depends on how powerful stars are. Then again, this is easytech, they will probably make stars powerful. Personally, I think Monty > Vatutin > Roko in terms of price performance. 1. Yes vatutin has the oh so slightest advantage when on medium tanks but I was focusing on an optimal endgame lineup, why bother with Vatutin when Patton can be your melee guy? 2. Yes this is kinda biased but movement is the best star in the game imo. 1. What if I want more than 1 medium? Heavy tanks aren't everywhere after all. 2. That's just your opinion; how is that biased? Based on my experience, I value damage over movement. Your experience probably makes you think otherwise. |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 8, 2021 18:58:42 GMT
1. Yes vatutin has the oh so slightest advantage when on medium tanks but I was focusing on an optimal endgame lineup, why bother with Vatutin when Patton can be your melee guy? 2. Yes this is kinda biased but movement is the best star in the game imo. 1. What if I want more than 1 medium? Heavy tanks aren't everywhere after all. 2. That's just your opinion; how is that biased? Based on my experience, I value damage over movement. Your experience probably makes you think otherwise. 1. Timoshenko? Also why would I need more than 1 heavy? One KV-6+Monty/Roko is enough. 2. In my experience movement has proven to be a very versatile and useful stat be it for launch quick attacks, scout the enemy formations, move through key locations quickly in defense maps, recover in a safe spot then swiftly returning to the fight, etc. |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Mar 8, 2021 19:17:28 GMT
1. What if I want more than 1 medium? Heavy tanks aren't everywhere after all. 2. That's just your opinion; how is that biased? Based on my experience, I value damage over movement. Your experience probably makes you think otherwise. 1. Timoshenko? Also why would I need more than 1 heavy? One KV-6+Monty/Roko is enough. 2. In my experience movement has proven to be a very versatile and useful stat be it for launch quick attacks, scout the enemy formations, move through key locations quickly in defense maps, recover in a safe spot then swiftly returning to the fight, etc. 1. What if I want someone stronger than Timoshenko? That's the point I'm making. One heavy tanker is enough. You'll need more mediums than heavys anyway. 2. My playstyle is just different. I keep my units moving forward every turn. I almost never go back to heal. |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 8, 2021 19:23:52 GMT
1. Timoshenko? Also why would I need more than 1 heavy? One KV-6+Monty/Roko is enough. 2. In my experience movement has proven to be a very versatile and useful stat be it for launch quick attacks, scout the enemy formations, move through key locations quickly in defense maps, recover in a safe spot then swiftly returning to the fight, etc. 1. What if I want someone stronger than Timoshenko? That's the point I'm making. One heavy tanker is enough. You'll need more mediums than heavys anyway. 2. My playstyle is just different. I keep my units moving forward every turn. I almost never go back to heal. 1. You'll get 6 general slots in endgame missions, I would usually have 2 tankers meanwhile the other 4 slots I'll reserve for infantry, artillery, navy, air force, etc. I just find having a mixed team to be extremely useful in every almost every scenario. 2. In the some missions the enemies fire power is so immense and safe spots so rare that you'll be forced to go back and forth between cities and the enemy, also my attacks are usually very aggressive and reckless meaning I take alot more casualties causing me to retreat more often. Ps: pls stop tagging/quoting me I'm struggling to get some sleep. |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Mar 8, 2021 19:39:24 GMT
1. What if I want someone stronger than Timoshenko? That's the point I'm making. One heavy tanker is enough. You'll need more mediums than heavys anyway. 2. My playstyle is just different. I keep my units moving forward every turn. I almost never go back to heal. 1. You'll get 6 general slots in endgame missions, I would usually have 2 tankers meanwhile the other 4 slots I'll reserve for infantry, artillery, navy, air force, etc. I just find having a mixed team to be extremely useful in every almost every scenario. 2. In the some missions the enemies fire power is so immense and safe spots so rare that you'll be forced to go back and forth between cities and the enemy, also my attacks are usually very aggressive and reckless meaning I take alot more casualties causing me to retreat more often. Ps: pls stop tagging/quoting me I'm struggling to get some sleep. This'll be the last quote. Sorry. 1. Everyone has different compositions of generals. I'm more of a tank person, so Vatutin is a strong 3rd option for me. 2. I'm a very cautious person, so I don't take much casualties besides the occasional infantry and armored car. If you need sleep, why are you on the forum responding to my messages? Just ignore them and go to sleep. Your health comes first, so respond some other time. |
|
|
|
Post by zink on Mar 9, 2021 3:36:08 GMT
Vatutin, beeg damage
|
|
|
|
Post by faxe on Mar 9, 2021 6:04:38 GMT
Maybe Patton? Heute shows up in 41 africa and 44.
|
|
