|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 15, 2021 13:59:18 GMT
He literally said MacArthur is better than Guderian in WC4 before. I never said that, Manstein, I just want to change things up, Nobunaga Oda, and I am a hard proponent of defensive warfare. The best offense is a good defense. Don't worry buddy, denial is the first stage of grief that ends in acceptance. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2021 14:17:22 GMT
I never said that, Manstein, I just want to change things up, Nobunaga Oda , and I am a hard proponent of defensive warfare. The best offense is a good defense. "Blasphemy! MacArthur is Superior to Guderian (in WC4)! *sobs* Wellesley is Superior to Blucher in EW6!" Oh yeah you did. Oh Yeah! I remember that too! In the infantry run challenge board! Speaking of which, Gerd von Rundstedt how's that going? |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Mar 15, 2021 21:42:56 GMT
"Blasphemy! MacArthur is Superior to Guderian (in WC4)! *sobs* Wellesley is Superior to Blucher in EW6!" Oh yeah you did. Oh Yeah! I remember that too! In the infantry run challenge board! Speaking of which, Gerd von Rundstedt how's that going? I conceded after I realized that I couldn't play 4 games at a time. |
|
|
|
Post by journeykeen on Mar 16, 2021 2:43:26 GMT
No.
It just is not possible to beat WC4 with infantry generals making a majority of the 6 general slots in campaign.
|
|
