|
Post by zink on Mar 18, 2021 3:04:40 GMT
Still ain't swallowin an elephant
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2021 3:06:57 GMT
Still ain't swallowin an elephant It will eat the elephant.
|
|
|
Post by zink on Mar 18, 2021 3:10:00 GMT
Still ain't swallowin an elephant It will eat the elephant. This is *Auto Corrected*ed I'm just gonna dead it here
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Mar 18, 2021 14:52:13 GMT
What kinda whale can swallow a whole elephant? A big blue whale. It uses baleen. Cannot eat an elephant.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2021 14:54:14 GMT
It uses baleen. Cannot eat an elephant. Who?
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 18, 2021 14:57:35 GMT
It uses baleen. Cannot eat an elephant. Who? Whales have smaller throats that don't allow them to swallow a human adult even if the tried much less an elephant.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2021 15:03:39 GMT
Whales have smaller throats that don't allow them to swallow a human adult even if the tried much less an elephant. I can't understand what you are saying.
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 18, 2021 15:04:37 GMT
Whales have smaller throats that don't allow them to swallow a human adult even if the tried much less an elephant. I can't understand what you are saying. *sighs* why do I even try with you? Whales can't feasibly swallow an elephant.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2021 15:06:15 GMT
I can't understand what you are saying. *sighs* why do I even try with you? Whales can't feasibly swallow an elephant. What is meaning of Feasibly?
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 18, 2021 15:07:15 GMT
*sighs* why do I even try with you? Whales can't feasibly swallow an elephant. What is meaning of Feasibly? Feasibly: in a way that possible or practical to do or achieve.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2021 15:09:41 GMT
What is meaning of Feasibly? Feasibly: in a way that possible or practical to do or achieve. Oh But it is possible for the whale to defeat an elephant.
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 18, 2021 15:11:38 GMT
Feasibly: in a way that possible or practical to do or achieve. Oh But it is possible for the whale to defeat an elephant. And the opposite is also true your point being?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2021 15:14:58 GMT
Oh But it is possible for the whale to defeat an elephant. And the opposite is also true your point being? But it is true that whale can defeat elephant, even you agree, hence my point proven. Thank you Have a Nice Day.
|
|
|
Post by STILETT0 on Mar 22, 2021 21:43:44 GMT
It is rather strange to compare the strength of a Cavalry general and an Admiral. It is like a (in)famous question: who is stronger an elephant or a whale? I was wondering, where is Admirals Cradock and Graf Von Spee? What about Semyon Budyonny, or Voroshilov? They were high ranking enough at the time to be added to this game. Of course, that means that Voroshilov would stop being a joke, because he was actually pretty good on cavalry. Churchill could also be added, if you make him absolutely crap as an admiral, because of the mess that was Gallipoli
|
|
|
Post by STILETT0 on Mar 22, 2021 21:50:14 GMT
So many jokes generals you can get out of this game. Where's Napoleon II? His stupidity was key in forming the German Empire. There is no representation of the the Battle Of New Orleans in the Civil War. Farragut doesn't really get any representation. What about Nathaniel Banks? He was a joke in everything but economics.
|
|