|
|
Post by HangryBird on Mar 19, 2021 15:37:15 GMT
I will formerly review Monty, Roko, and Vatutin tomorrow. Today is Slim and Tassigny. So give monty or rocko the green if the other is bought, pink otherwise. Good thinking. I still feel as tho Monty should be at least a tier below rokossovsky. Because anti armor vs extra 5 damage and the campaigns where monty is useful in, you either don’t need or there are better generals like patton available. Perhaps I should curve monty up a point tho While anti armor is superior to ace forces, Monty still has alot over Roko: 1. Better stats Monty has 1 additional tank star and 3 air stars making him slightly stronger and more versatile. 2. Upgraded machinist Machinist is one of the best skills to have when commanding heavy tanks so the fact that Monty has the upgraded version gives him the edge I'm durability. 3. In the lineup of 3 separate campaigns Monty is featured in the lineup of 3 separate campaigns and 2 of these campaigns happen to predominantly feature heavy tanks, this also somewhat closes the price gap between the two So overall Roko may be the winner but only by a very slight margin so I think they deserve to have the same color. Also, that 5 additional damage can add up when you compare Monty and Roko on KV-6s. Lots of extra attacks against multiple enemies cause this. |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Mar 19, 2021 15:49:01 GMT
So if you have Rokossovsky, you should buy Vatutin over Monty or if you have Monty buy Vatutin over Rokossovsky. Making Vatutin the 3rd best allied tank general Finally Vatutin is getting his dues. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Mar 19, 2021 15:55:25 GMT
It's because of stoic... He is always trying crappy generals while looking for a gem. And because of him a lot of forum members overrate crappy gens  |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Mar 19, 2021 15:57:25 GMT
It's because of stoic ... He is always trying crappy generals while looking for a gem. And because of him a lot of forum members overrate crappy gens What's because of Stoic. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Mar 19, 2021 15:57:30 GMT
It's because of stoic... He is always trying crappy generals while looking for a gem. And because of him a lot of forum members overrate crappy gens It is not true... Well, not entirely true |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Mar 19, 2021 16:05:41 GMT
It's because of stoic ... He is always trying crappy generals while looking for a gem. And because of him a lot of forum members overrate crappy gens What's because of Stoic. It was a veiled statement that Vaturin is crappy. Didn't want to be blamed in personal attack that's why mentioned stoic. He won't take it personally... |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Mar 19, 2021 16:06:30 GMT
It was a veiled statement that Vaturin is crappy. Didn't want to be blamed in personal attack that's why mentioned stoic . He won't take it personally... What do you mean?! Vatutin is a great general. He is still a weapon of Mass destruction. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Mar 19, 2021 16:08:02 GMT
It was a veiled statement that Vaturin is crappy. Didn't want to be blamed in personal attack that's why mentioned stoic . He won't take it personally... What do you mean?! Vatutin is a great general. He is still a weapon of Mass destruction. I mean if You have 3 tank gens that are much better then 4th can be called crappy. It is just an opinion. Don't take it personally. |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Mar 19, 2021 16:10:46 GMT
What do you mean?! Vatutin is a great general. He is still a weapon of Mass destruction. I mean if You have 3 tank gens that are much better then 4th can be called crappy. It is just an opinion. Don't take it personally. He is better overall than Rokossovsky or Montgomery, and as Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus says, you do not need Montogmery AND Rokossovsky. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Mar 19, 2021 16:15:11 GMT
I mean if You have 3 tank gens that are much better then 4th can be called crappy. It is just an opinion. Don't take it personally. He is better overall than Rokossovsky or Montgomery, and as Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus says, you do not need Montogmery AND Rokossovsky. Why do You think I don't need them both? Just because Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus said so? And I disagree that he is better than any of these two gens. |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Mar 19, 2021 16:16:19 GMT
Why do You think I don't need them both? Just because Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus said so? And I disagree that he is better than any of these two gens. He is not better than the two generals it is just that you do not need to go Bankrupt by getting both. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Mar 19, 2021 16:20:06 GMT
Why do You think I don't need them both? Just because Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus said so? And I disagree that he is better than any of these two gens. He is not better than the two generals it is just that you do not need to go Bankrupt by getting both. price is not an issue in this game as You can progress even with free gens. |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Mar 19, 2021 16:21:00 GMT
He is not better than the two generals it is just that you do not need to go Bankrupt by getting both. price is not an issue in this game as You can progress even with free gens. True but then you do not need both Rokossovsky and Montgomery. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Mar 19, 2021 16:23:00 GMT
price is not an issue in this game as You can progress even with free gens. True but then you do not need both Rokossovsky and Montgomery. Why? Could You give reasons? |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Mar 19, 2021 16:24:12 GMT
True but then you do not need both Rokossovsky and Montgomery. Why? Could You give reasons? Because they are extensions of the same general!! Meanwhile Vatutin is different, and Better on Medium tanks and Armored Cars! |
|
