|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 10, 2021 19:34:10 GMT
The glossary has been updated somewhat. Rundstedt has been curved down. Eisenhower has been curved up to blue. And some of my nonsensical reviews such as Voronov being blue has been fixed. I still think Simonds is blue however, simply as the 10 jungle fighting bonus is quite great imo, whereas Alexander’s desert fighting will be useless in most missions. "More useful especially on Karl" ah yes, Simonds the German commander. I am an Idiot 😂 |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Apr 10, 2021 19:35:43 GMT
"More useful especially on Karl" ah yes, Simonds the German commander. I am an Idiot 😂 Anyway, Why is Simonds blue? He should be green at most, in what world would you need 3 artillery generals on the field and in what world would you choose Simonds? |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 10, 2021 19:36:27 GMT
Still, moving simonds from jungle to jungle till will not be that tedious with transports. I think he is better than chuikov too. But we only need him to replace alexander in end game
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 10, 2021 19:36:54 GMT
Anyway, Why is Simonds blue? He should be green at most, in what world would you need 3 artillery generals on the field and in what world would you choose Simonds? Replacement for Alexander and potentially Chuikov. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 10, 2021 19:38:04 GMT
Actually nevermind you are right. Simonds is green at best
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Apr 10, 2021 19:39:01 GMT
Anyway, Why is Simonds blue? He should be green at most, in what world would you need 3 artillery generals on the field and in what world would you choose Simonds? Replacement for Alexander and potentially Chuikov. , I think that rating should lead somewhere. To the decision WHO do we need to buy. So there should be 1 purple, 1 blue and the rest. There should not be several purple and several blue. There is no sense. At least as I see it. Otherwise the rating is just for rating itself, not for decision making purposes. |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Apr 10, 2021 19:40:28 GMT
Anyway, Why is Simonds blue? He should be green at most, in what world would you need 3 artillery generals on the field and in what world would you choose Simonds? Replacement for Alexander and potentially Chuikov. Not a chance he replaces Chuikov and if I want a premium replacement i would pick De gaulle or Mountbatten. |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Apr 10, 2021 19:41:49 GMT
Actually nevermind you are right. Simonds is green at best "Snap back to reality!" |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 10, 2021 19:44:19 GMT
Replacement for Alexander and potentially Chuikov. , I think that rating should lead somewhere. To the decision WHO do we need to buy. So there should be 1 purple, 1 blue and the rest. There should not be several purple and several blue. There is no sense. At least as I see it. Otherwise the rating is just for rating itself, not for decision making purposes. Good point. Only a select few generals should be purple or blue. I curved Simonds down to green because I remembered that 3 artillery generals would be unnecessary, and chuikov is still better than him overall, especially considering he is free. Purple are the excellent purchase, blue are the great ones, and green and below should be the unnecessary ones. Furthermore, from actually using Roko with Manstein, I think his output is not always enough to knock even an infantry stack down and monty only has one skill, so both will be put into blue. |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Apr 10, 2021 19:46:53 GMT
Also if you would include cheapos like Voronov and Keitel I think you should include Greim. He's the best low cost gen to purchase imo in terms of usefulness and longevity surpassing Yamaguchi and since the axis lack a free air gen he's a budget option since the next best thing is around 800 medals.
|
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Apr 10, 2021 19:50:09 GMT
Anyway, Why is Simonds blue? He should be green at most, in what world would you need 3 artillery generals on the field and in what world would you choose Simonds? Wow I sound more like a jerk than I expected, sorry about that. |
|
|
|
Post by zink on Apr 10, 2021 19:52:17 GMT
How dafaq you gonna say "second only to Patton" but Pattons only great?
|
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Apr 10, 2021 19:55:09 GMT
How dafaq you gonna say "second only to Patton" but Pattons only great? oOOoooOooFffF, I never noticed Patton was turquoise, let's riot! |
|
|
|
Post by zink on Apr 10, 2021 20:03:42 GMT
How dafaq you gonna say "second only to Patton" but Pattons only great? oOOoooOooFffF, I never noticed Patton was turquoise, let's riot! Yeah I wanna throw some stuff round! |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 10, 2021 21:14:05 GMT
Do you think Patton should be pink. I mean I can curve him up if the general community agrees he should.
However on a heavy tank, all he has is his stars and a low level panzer leader for output. And on a medium tank, he is admittedly pretty sweet
|
|
