|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Mar 17, 2021 23:00:55 GMT
Imo 4.5 stars on infantry and 5.5 stars in cities makes him an amazing purchase as none of the other russian infantry generals are any good. Any other opinions?
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Mar 17, 2021 23:01:43 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Quixote de la Mancha on Mar 17, 2021 23:10:05 GMT
Perso, I have a strict "no under 3* gen" policy. Except Greim, you don't know Greim like I do 😊.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Mar 17, 2021 23:28:35 GMT
Huh people don’t like malinovsky. I mean, bayonet charge lvl 2 for a cheap general is pretty good combined with urban fighting.
|
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Mar 17, 2021 23:31:59 GMT
Huh people don’t like malinovsky. I mean, bayonet charge lvl 2 for a cheap general is pretty good combined with urban fighting. Good price performance = 4 stars. Minus 2 stars because bad long-term investment = 2 stars. |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Mar 18, 2021 0:06:52 GMT
Imo 4.5 stars on infantry and 5.5 stars in cities makes him an amazing purchase as none of the other russian infantry generals are any good. Any other opinions? Why the heck does it matter than none of the russian infantrymen are any good? |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Mar 18, 2021 0:13:57 GMT
Imo 4.5 stars on infantry and 5.5 stars in cities makes him an amazing purchase as none of the other russian infantry generals are any good. Any other opinions? Why the heck does it matter than none of the russian infantrymen are any good? Fair enough. It would be nice to have a decent infantry unit on the eastern front without having to purchase tassigny or slim tho |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Mar 18, 2021 0:14:26 GMT
Huh people don’t like malinovsky. I mean, bayonet charge lvl 2 for a cheap general is pretty good combined with urban fighting. Good price performance = 4 stars. Minus 2 stars because bad long-term investment = 2 stars. Deserves at least a 3 imo. Think about it. As a paratrooper he is pretty dang good. Tho maybe smigly is the best cheap paratrooper |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Mar 18, 2021 0:43:14 GMT
Why the heck does it matter than none of the russian infantrymen are any good? Fair enough. It would be nice to have a decent infantry unit on the eastern front without having to purchase tassigny or slim tho You mean the eastern front where you get to use Chuikov, Timoshenko, Katyusha, Cossacks and KV-6? Where you’ll also probably pick up Govorov and Roko too? Just the massive amounts of AoE damage renders an infantry general totally unecessary as you’ll easily find stacks to kill even with cossacks without generals. I mean having any extra tools for low prices are nice to have, but pretty unecessary with the tools that’s given to you for free or should be picked up at this point. |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Mar 18, 2021 0:45:09 GMT
Fair enough. It would be nice to have a decent infantry unit on the eastern front without having to purchase tassigny or slim tho You mean the eastern front where you get to use Chuikov, Timoshenko, Katyusha, Cossacks and KV-6? Where you’ll also probably pick up Govorov and Roko too? Just the massive amounts of AoE damage renders an infantry general totally unecessary as you’ll easily find stacks to kill even with cossacks without generals. I mean having any extra tools for low prices are nice to have, but pretty unecessary with the tools that’s given to you for free or should be picked up at this point. And Vatutin as well. I mean Malinvosky does not stand a chance. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Mar 18, 2021 0:48:40 GMT
You all have good points. Malinkovsky will be demoted to green tomorrow
|
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Mar 18, 2021 0:57:25 GMT
You mean the eastern front where you get to use Chuikov, Timoshenko, Katyusha, Cossacks and KV-6? Where you’ll also probably pick up Govorov and Roko too? Just the massive amounts of AoE damage renders an infantry general totally unecessary as you’ll easily find stacks to kill even with cossacks without generals. I mean having any extra tools for low prices are nice to have, but pretty unecessary with the tools that’s given to you for free or should be picked up at this point. And Vatutin as well. I mean Malinvosky does not stand a chance. I don’t see the need for Vatutin either really. Not unless you’re going to avoid Rokossovsky. A lot of the eastern front is covered in snow so Timoshenko is just 5 damage away and a weak anti-armor away from being basically the same as Vatutin for most of that campaign. Plus Vatutin is slow and there’s very few ways you can fix that at that point. |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Mar 18, 2021 1:11:05 GMT
And Vatutin as well. I mean Malinvosky does not stand a chance. I don’t see the need for Vatutin either really. Not unless you’re going to avoid Rokossovsky. A lot of the eastern front is covered in snow so Timoshenko is just 5 damage away and a weak anti-armor away from being basically the same as Vatutin for most of that campaign. Plus Vatutin is slow and there’s very few ways you can fix that at that point. The problem with Vatutin, and I will admit this is speed. But he is still amazing especially as a starter general because of his price. |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Mar 18, 2021 1:15:52 GMT
I don’t see the need for Vatutin either really. Not unless you’re going to avoid Rokossovsky. A lot of the eastern front is covered in snow so Timoshenko is just 5 damage away and a weak anti-armor away from being basically the same as Vatutin for most of that campaign. Plus Vatutin is slow and there’s very few ways you can fix that at that point. The problem with Vatutin, and I will admit this is speed. But he is still amazing especially as a starter general because of his price. I'll argue that that tanks are already have enough mobility by themselves; without generals or special forces. To me, Vatutin's lack of mobility is negligible, but that's an opinion that nobody else agrees with. |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Mar 18, 2021 1:19:03 GMT
The problem with Vatutin, and I will admit this is speed. But he is still amazing especially as a starter general because of his price. I'll argue that that tanks are already have enough mobility by themselves; without generals or special forces. To me, Vatutin's lack of mobility is negligible, but that's an opinion that nobody else agrees with. I share that opinion too. |
|
