|
|
Post by General Kenobi on Mar 22, 2021 10:03:26 GMT
I’ll make a top 10 ranking soon
|
|
|
|
Post by General Kenobi on Mar 22, 2021 10:04:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by General Kenobi on Mar 22, 2021 10:05:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Mar 22, 2021 15:09:21 GMT
Everyone above except Suchet and Bolivar are great
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Mar 22, 2021 15:11:38 GMT
Everyone above except Suchet and Bolivar are great Garibaldi got that sweet Tactics Master. |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 22, 2021 15:13:10 GMT
Taking price into consideration, definitely Massena.
|
|
|
|
Post by General Kenobi on Mar 22, 2021 19:31:53 GMT
Soon enough I’ll make a poll about 4th or 5th best since 1st 2nd 3rd are taken although 2nd and 3rd are at a tie, although I would prefer Karl over Garubalod
|
|
|
|
Post by 6Johnny23 on Mar 23, 2021 21:29:48 GMT
Everyone above except Suchet and Bolivar are great I would say that Karl is definitely the best. Grinding is easy in this game (only 1 or 2 very hard campaigns in each chapter), and conquests do exist. He has much better skills in my opinion, and has better output if used correctly. But Massena is not far behind, and Barclay/Washington are definitely the 3rd best. In my opinion, the rankings are: 1. Karl 2. Massena 3. Barclay/Washington 4. Barclay/Washington 5. Lannes/Garibaldi/Suvorov/Bismarck 6. Lannes/Garibaldi/Suvorov/Bismarck 7. Lannes/Garibaldi/Suvorov/Bismarck 8. Wellesley 9. Bismarck 10. Bolivar Wellesley, Bismarck, Bolivar, and Suchet are only here because I couldn't find any other, better generals than them. I might be a little too harsh on Wellesley, but honestly, if 7 other generals are more fit to be IAPs in your category, well, make your own decision. But Wellesley has great stats and 2 great skills, 2 middle of the road skills, and one bad skill. Not bad, only his cost and skills bother me. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Mar 24, 2021 2:49:38 GMT
Everyone above except Suchet and Bolivar are great I would say that Karl is definitely the best. Grinding is easy in this game (only 1 or 2 very hard campaigns in each chapter), and conquests do exist. He has much better skills in my opinion, and has better output if used correctly. But Massena is not far behind, and Barclay/Washington are definitely the 3rd best. In my opinion, the rankings are: 1. Karl 2. Massena 3. Barclay/Washington 4. Barclay/Washington 5. Lannes/Garibaldi/Suvorov/Bismarck 6. Lannes/Garibaldi/Suvorov/Bismarck 7. Lannes/Garibaldi/Suvorov/Bismarck 8. Wellesley 9. Bismarck 10. Bolivar Wellesley, Bismarck, Bolivar, and Suchet are only here because I couldn't find any other, better generals than them. I might be a little too harsh on Wellesley, but honestly, if 7 other generals are more fit to be IAPs in your category, well, make your own decision. But Wellesley has great stats and 2 great skills, 2 middle of the road skills, and one bad skill. Not bad, only his cost and skills bother me. Moreau or Grant can probably replace Bolivar. |
|
|
|
Post by 6Johnny23 on Mar 25, 2021 2:05:20 GMT
I would say that Karl is definitely the best. Grinding is easy in this game (only 1 or 2 very hard campaigns in each chapter), and conquests do exist. He has much better skills in my opinion, and has better output if used correctly. But Massena is not far behind, and Barclay/Washington are definitely the 3rd best. In my opinion, the rankings are: 1. Karl 2. Massena 3. Barclay/Washington 4. Barclay/Washington 5. Lannes/Garibaldi/Suvorov/Bismarck 6. Lannes/Garibaldi/Suvorov/Bismarck 7. Lannes/Garibaldi/Suvorov/Bismarck 8. Wellesley 9. Bismarck 10. Bolivar Wellesley, Bismarck, Bolivar, and Suchet are only here because I couldn't find any other, better generals than them. I might be a little too harsh on Wellesley, but honestly, if 7 other generals are more fit to be IAPs in your category, well, make your own decision. But Wellesley has great stats and 2 great skills, 2 middle of the road skills, and one bad skill. Not bad, only his cost and skills bother me. Moreau or Grant can probably replace Bolivar. Either way, you will never touch them as Massena exists. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Mar 26, 2021 20:19:51 GMT
Bolivar is really terrible once you consider how bad infantry defense is. Prince to king rank barely helps. The best defensive skill on infantry is ambush.
Even suchet is way more tolerable than bolivar.
|
|
|
|
Post by 6Johnny23 on Mar 26, 2021 21:46:18 GMT
Bolivar is really terrible once you consider how bad infantry defense is. Prince to king rank barely helps. The best defensive skill on infantry is ambush. Even suchet is way more tolerable than bolivar. True, but Bolivar is cheaper. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Mar 27, 2021 13:39:17 GMT
Bolivar is really terrible once you consider how bad infantry defense is. Prince to king rank barely helps. The best defensive skill on infantry is ambush. Even suchet is way more tolerable than bolivar. True, but Bolivar is cheaper. You don’t really need a starting infantry general. I unlocked Lannes 50% off just with a maxed Murat. And Lannes is far better and cheaper than Bolivar |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Mar 27, 2021 15:46:34 GMT
True, but Bolivar is cheaper. You don’t really need a starting infantry general. I unlocked Lannes 50% off just with a maxed Murat. And Lannes is far better and cheaper than Bolivar There are at least 11 infantry generals better than Bolivar. So unless we're going with an all infantry lineup, Bolivar should never be on the purchase list. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Mar 27, 2021 15:49:25 GMT
Bolivar is really terrible once you consider how bad infantry defense is. Prince to king rank barely helps. The best defensive skill on infantry is ambush. Even suchet is way more tolerable than bolivar. I think it's alert. Ambush relies too much on luck. |
|
