|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2021 7:26:33 GMT
They can get resources from Soviet Union which was providing lwnd lease to Germany to buy time. Soviet Union was not a real threat because Stalin was cautious to an invasion of Germany due to Wehrmacht being undefeated till then, he has no plans to take enmity with Hitler any time soon. Germans have given them free hand in Asia (particularly Afghanistan and South Asia) in exchange for no further claims in Europe. Stalin wanted to reform his army after the Winter War. After that, he would eventually break the pact and invade once he's extracted a significant amount of concessions from Hitler. Stalin could and did use the threat of ceasing raw material shipments to extract concessions. The original invasion date for the Soviet Union was the most optimal time that Germany could have invaded. After the Balkan Delay, Hitler and his generals were united that they couldn't afford to delay the invasion again. They didn't want the Soviets to get too strong and crush Germany once Stalin decided that the pact was no longer in his interest to maintain. The Soviets were more interested in Europe, which is evidenced by their occupation of Bukovina, which was not included in the pact. Still, none of this changes my belief that Germany was not be able to develop the capabilities to invade Britain. They never threatened to stop resources supply, after hearing reports from his intelligence about British sources saying Germany might invade Soviets, he ordered for more resources to be sent to Germany to not to provoke Hitler. www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCP1AejCL4DA7jYkZAELRhHQ&ved=2ahUKEwi86p_53P_vAhVmxDgGHSnoC-YQFjAAegQIAxAH&usg=AOvVaw3GdmFrPV56s4hqhnlK85av |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Apr 15, 2021 7:28:07 GMT
Bombers are used for supporting the army and attacking key enemy industries from a medium range, which is how the Germans used them. Naval bombers are used against ships. What makes different? By that way, it depends on against whom they are used. What exactly do you mean by that? I have already explained that they are designed and built for different purposes. I mentioned that bit about how the Germans used them because that is the subject. What I really meant, is that in general, Bombers are used for supporting the army and attacking key enemy industries from a medium range. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2021 7:30:21 GMT
What makes different? By that way, it depends on against whom they are used. What exactly do you mean by that? I have already explained that they are designed and built for different purposes. I mentioned that bit about how the Germans used them because that is the subject. What I really meant, is that in general, Bombers are used for supporting the army and attacking key enemy industries from a medium range. I mean why bombers cannot be used against Navy according to your logic |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Apr 15, 2021 7:31:58 GMT
Stalin wanted to reform his army after the Winter War. After that, he would eventually break the pact and invade once he's extracted a significant amount of concessions from Hitler. Stalin could and did use the threat of ceasing raw material shipments to extract concessions. The original invasion date for the Soviet Union was the most optimal time that Germany could have invaded. After the Balkan Delay, Hitler and his generals were united that they couldn't afford to delay the invasion again. They didn't want the Soviets to get too strong and crush Germany once Stalin decided that the pact was no longer in his interest to maintain. The Soviets were more interested in Europe, which is evidenced by their occupation of Bukovina, which was not included in the pact. Still, none of this changes my belief that Germany was not be able to develop the capabilities to invade Britain. They never threatened to stop resources supply, after hearing reports from his intelligence about British sources saying Germany might invade Soviets, he ordered for more resources to be sent to Germany to not to provoke Hitler. Stalin did threaten and actually carried out his threat in August 1940: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German%E2%80%93Soviet_Axis_talks#Suspension_of_Soviet_raw_materials_to_GermanySecond part is true though. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2021 7:32:57 GMT
A sample
|
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Apr 15, 2021 7:34:50 GMT
What exactly do you mean by that? I have already explained that they are designed and built for different purposes. I mentioned that bit about how the Germans used them because that is the subject. What I really meant, is that in general, Bombers are used for supporting the army and attacking key enemy industries from a medium range. I mean why bombers cannot be used against Navy according to your logic Bombers can be used, they're just not as effective. I really don't know how to explain this other than that different planes are designed and built for different purposes. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2021 7:35:04 GMT
You use Wikipedia for detailed information, lol |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2021 7:35:52 GMT
I mean why bombers cannot be used against Navy according to your logic Bombers can be used, they're just not as effective. I really don't know how to explain this other than that different planes are designed and built for different purposes. If you cannot prove then why are you claiming? |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Apr 15, 2021 7:37:42 GMT
Bombers can be used, they're just not as effective. I really don't know how to explain this other than that different planes are designed and built for different purposes. If you cannot prove then why are you claiming? Sorry, I don't know how to explain why different types of planes exist.  |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Apr 15, 2021 7:38:48 GMT
You use Wikipedia for detailed information, lol I can find you another source, if you'd like, I've seen this information come from other sources. Wikipedia is just convenient. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2021 7:39:40 GMT
If you cannot prove then why are you claiming? Sorry, I don't know how to explain why different types of planes exist. Then no need to claim. |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Apr 15, 2021 7:41:26 GMT
Sorry, I don't know how to explain why different types of planes exist. Then no need to claim. Sorry, I'm not making a claim, I am trying to explain a fact. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Apr 15, 2021 7:41:32 GMT
You use Wikipedia for detailed information, lol What do you use then? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2021 7:42:10 GMT
You use Wikipedia for detailed information, lol I can find you another source, if you'd like, I've seen this information come from other sources. Wikipedia is just convenient. The information is true, but this is like claiming Vichy France was German Puppet. At first glance it seems it is true and it is partially true but as you know more about it ,your opinion changes that it maybe a Puppet, but not like Slovakia for example, it was more like Soviet Union. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2021 7:42:52 GMT
You use Wikipedia for detailed information, lol What do you use then? As many as possible and also sometimes, you need to use your own brain. |
|
