|
|
Post by John Marston on Mar 26, 2021 14:14:03 GMT
Over here, everyone can give their suggestions and rules. It will be helpful for the RP execs. Anything is welcome. I am currently working at my full speed to make TW possible from next month and expect contributions from everyone. Is it ok eeeeef? |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 26, 2021 14:18:25 GMT
Sure, also imo I don't recommend rushing through the process of rule making just to meet the deadline on time, take as much time as you need! I know this from my DnD game rule making since 5 hours straight of working on my DnD game is less productive than 2 hours of working spread across the week.
|
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Mar 26, 2021 14:20:44 GMT
Sure, also imo I don't recommend rushing through the process of rule making just to meet the deadline on time, take as much time as you need! I know this from my DnD game rule making since 5 hours straight of working on my DnD game is less productive than 2 hours of working spread across the week. I am not going on the rules. They are already made. In fact, we have two sets - one by Warlord247 and the old ones |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Mar 26, 2021 14:21:27 GMT
And by other rules, I mean the one for which the players will be banned from RP, which rests on you both
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2021 16:11:00 GMT
I suggest a change that both attacker and defender should roll and result will be like this:-
Attacker has 1 VD advantage- 50 percent casualties on both sides and defending army is pushed back.
Defender has 1 VD advantage- attack is repelled with 40 percent casualties(10 plus in case of TBW's presence and 10 plus in Bunker's pretense and if both are present then 30 plus) for attackers and 30 percent for defenders...
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2021 16:17:15 GMT
Not sure why me and Warlord247 werent tagged here, As we were the main contributers of TW4... One rule I suggest is a three strike system for people who are toxic or aren't following the rules. It would work something like this... Offense 1: Player is warned Offense 2: Penalty is given(to be determined by execs), Player is given final warning Offense 3: Player is kicked from RP. Their nation is made available if game is new, is ceded to active neighbour if late-game. If a player who has been kicked continues to post in the RP, this will be considered spam and the player will be reported to Saltin for further reprimand. Is that good? |
|
|
|
Post by Warlord247 on Mar 26, 2021 17:05:46 GMT
Seems good to me
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Quixote de la Mancha on Mar 26, 2021 22:13:43 GMT
I dunno, I never really liked the "dice system". I would prefer the type of rules from the first one plus some regulation
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2021 0:26:12 GMT
Not sure why me and Warlord247 werent tagged here, As we were the main contributers of TW4... One rule I suggest is a three strike system for people who are toxic or aren't following the rules. It would work something like this... Offense 1: Player is warned Offense 2: Penalty is given(to be determined by execs), Player is given final warning Offense 3: Player is kicked from RP. Their nation is made available if game is new, is ceded to active neighbour if late-game. If a player who has been kicked continues to post in the RP, this will be considered spam and the player will be reported to Saltin for further reprimand. Is that good? The player will have -2 VD till he accepts his fault. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Mar 27, 2021 1:01:35 GMT
I suggest a change that both attacker and defender should roll and result will be like this:- Attacker has 1 VD advantage- 50 percent casualties on both sides and defending army is pushed back. Defender has 1 VD advantage- attack is repelled with 40 percent casualties(10 plus in case of TBW's presence and 10 plus in Bunker's pretense and if both are present then 30 plus) for attackers and 30 percent for defenders... What do you mean by VD? and TBW |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Mar 27, 2021 1:06:33 GMT
Not sure why me and Warlord247 werent tagged here, As we were the main contributers of TW4... One rule I suggest is a three strike system for people who are toxic or aren't following the rules. It would work something like this... Offense 1: Player is warned Offense 2: Penalty is given(to be determined by execs), Player is given final warning Offense 3: Player is kicked from RP. Their nation is made available if game is new, is ceded to active neighbour if late-game. If a player who has been kicked continues to post in the RP, this will be considered spam and the player will be reported to Saltin for further reprimand. Is that good? Sorry for not tagging you. Actually, I was discussing with eeeeef about this and he asked me some suggestions. So, I made a thread so that everyone can express what they feel. This is ok. What I meant was " How exactly do we define an offense"? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2021 1:35:56 GMT
I suggest a change that both attacker and defender should roll and result will be like this:- Attacker has 1 VD advantage- 50 percent casualties on both sides and defending army is pushed back. Defender has 1 VD advantage- attack is repelled with 40 percent casualties(10 plus in case of TBW's presence and 10 plus in Bunker's pretense and if both are present then 30 plus) for attackers and 30 percent for defenders... What do you mean by VD? and TBW Value of Dice Rolled Trenches and Barbed Wire. |
|
|
|
Post by Warlord247 on Mar 27, 2021 2:53:34 GMT
Harassment of players and ignorance of battle should be 3 strike offenses.
Rule breaks and such should be 6 strike offenses, counted separately.
|
|
|
|
Post by Warlord247 on Mar 27, 2021 2:58:13 GMT
Harassment of players and ignorance of battle should be 3 strike offenses. Rule breaks and such should be 6 strike offenses, counted separately. The second one is in game rule breaks, like skipping research or something. I figure that should have more leniency. The player's post will also be ignored within the game. As for the first part of the first section, this also counts outside the Tw. Theres a zero tolerance policy for harassment. Sound good? |
|
|
|
Post by Don Quixote de la Mancha on Mar 27, 2021 4:56:21 GMT
Warlord247, eeeeef, I have a system I would like to propose: There would be no dice system or attack system, one could take turns whenever they want except when at war where they would have to wait for the enemy to respond to return the favour. The province system could be kept and probably should be kept as a "safeguard" to avoid any exaggerated attacks (invading France in one turn) Probably, I will try to elaborate on it some more if you guys are interested.
|
|
