|
|
Post by littlecorporal on Apr 16, 2021 8:59:04 GMT
Great guides! Biggest difference is with strong generals you can punch through France quicker, but the strategy is the same. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Apr 16, 2021 15:12:54 GMT
Great guides! Biggest difference is with strong generals you can punch through France quicker, but the strategy is the same. Yes and Port, no matter where you land, you must defeat the French generals, who are very strong |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Apr 16, 2021 15:37:33 GMT
Great guides! Biggest difference is with strong generals you can punch through France quicker, but the strategy is the same. Yes and Port , no matter where you land, you must defeat the French generals, who are very strong But ponder movement, It is not hard for Scharnhorst and Sophia to defeat those generals. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Apr 16, 2021 15:39:31 GMT
Yes and Port , no matter where you land, you must defeat the French generals, who are very strong But ponder movement, It is not hard for Scharnhorst and Sophia to defeat those generals. You still need a lot of resources and you are outnumbered in Amsterdam also. |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Apr 16, 2021 15:40:48 GMT
But ponder movement, It is not hard for Scharnhorst and Sophia to defeat those generals. You still need a lot of resources and you are outnumbered in Amsterdam also. But not hard If you heave good generals. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Apr 16, 2021 15:42:32 GMT
You still need a lot of resources and you are outnumbered in Amsterdam also. But not hard If you heave good generals. Yes. Especially considering that Napoleon is not on artillery. Defending Wellesley is a pain though |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Apr 16, 2021 19:16:59 GMT
But not hard If you heave good generals. Yes. Especially considering that Napoleon is not on artillery. Defending Wellesley is a pain though Yes John Marston, this is what Iβm saying, my Wellesley died. |
|
|
|
Post by STILETT0 on May 10, 2021 23:46:06 GMT
Hessen - All your troops are on water. Good luck finding a sweet landing spot and capturing enough farms for your army in time. And once you do that, victory is assured in this conquest. But if your units are destroyed before you land, then... Adios!! This was my first 1812 conquest. Send your navy to Baltimore, and land at Yorktown. Bombard Jackson with Sockolnicki, and you are assured Washington. Send all of your original generals to pinch the USA front between them and the British. The huge mistake that I made, was that I ignored the West until Spain and Russia had built up quite a bit of spam. Dearborn was also a pain, as he had capped and sat in Fort York, so I had to send a tangent army over there, because the British were doing sweet *autocorrected* all taking care of themselves. This is quite easy with no generals, anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by littlecorporal on May 11, 2021 0:43:10 GMT
It seems like in 1812 the AI adds tavern generals more quickly. Almost as soon as available.
|
|
|
|
Post by ππ³π°π΅π΄π¬πΊ on May 11, 2021 2:37:27 GMT
It seems like in 1812 the AI adds tavern generals more quickly. Almost as soon as available. If AI builds a new unit and has enough ressources, AI adds almost always a general. I never noticed later, but it depends on ressources - I don't think medals count. |
|
|
|
Post by littlecorporal on May 11, 2021 3:58:18 GMT
Not always. I discovered in my 1809 Swiss conquest that Russia will sit on Minsk for several rounds after the general is available in R15. Indians also sit on the generals in Cleveland. Maybe it's more about different countries. England seems to always add generals immediately.
|
|
