|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Jan 31, 2016 17:15:55 GMT
I only wanted to help, no offense.... 100% same what I thought while opening this thread.... |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Jan 31, 2016 17:19:03 GMT
I only wanted to help, no offense.... You did do a fantastic job and making the map. Don't feel bad.  |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Jan 31, 2016 17:20:23 GMT
I only wanted to help, no offense.... You did do a fantastic job and making the map. Don't feel bad. yeah, had you gotten the job you would be done by now and we would start the war... |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Jan 31, 2016 17:34:06 GMT
First:
Just keep the North American map, it looks perfect, less work for Talleyrand
Second:
Don't bash Talleyrand. He's doing his best.
|
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Jan 31, 2016 18:14:22 GMT
Great job NetherFreek . I am very busy but I will finish the Africa map. If Netherfreek wants to do Asia I encourage him. Also NetherFreek can you reduce the provinces in USA+Canada to max 6. Mexico is fine. |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Jan 31, 2016 18:40:13 GMT
Ok, ill make an other map of north america and ask permission to Mountbatten to make an asian map. The new NA map will provide the right states according to the civil war, but therefore i have a question: what should i do with neutral states? Should I absorb them into the conf and the states? Or should i let them stay neutral? And as i understand things correctly, all land beneath Mexico will be the "Pacific states of America", is that correct? |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Jan 31, 2016 18:48:07 GMT
Ok, ill make an other map of north america and ask permission to Mountbatten to make an asian map. The new NA map will provide the right states according to the civil war, but therefore i have a question: what should i do with neutral states? Should I absorb them into the conf and the states? Or should i let them stay neutral? And as i understand things correctly, all land beneath Mexico will be the "Pacific states of America", is that correct? California, Oregon and Washington are all the PSA. Oklahoma is absorbed into the CSA, but all other neutral states like Missouri, Kentucky and Maryland are Union |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Jan 31, 2016 18:50:34 GMT
And what should i do with the lands below mexico?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Jan 31, 2016 19:24:13 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Jan 31, 2016 19:25:05 GMT
And what should i do with the lands below mexico? All of Central America except for Panama and Mexico are united as the USCA (United States of Central America) Panama is a puppet of the USA and the Panama Canal is directly owned by the US |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Jan 31, 2016 19:35:08 GMT
Tnx to both |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Feb 1, 2016 9:32:06 GMT
America   Province List (in North America): Union: 4 Canada: 4 Confederates: 3 Mexico: 3 Central American Union: 2 Panama: 1 Denmark: 1 (greenland and iceland are one) Russia: 1 (Yakutsk) Neutrals: Colombia: 1 Venezuela: 1 |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Feb 1, 2016 10:30:29 GMT
Asia:  List of Provinces: Russia: 6 China: 4 Great Brittain: 4 (Egypt excluded) Ottoman: 3 (didn't exist that moment, but selectable so...) Japan: 3 Iran: 2 France: 1 (indochina) Union (america): 1 (fillipines) Afganistan: 1 Thailand: 1 Tibet: 1 Dutch Indonesia: 1 Najd: 1 Oman: 1 |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2016 10:40:09 GMT
Asia: List of Provinces: Russia: 6 China: 4 Great Brittain: 4 (Egypt excluded) Ottoman: 3 (didn't exist that moment, but selectable so...) Japan: 3 Iran: 2 France: 1 (indochina) Union (america): 1 (fillipines) Afganistan: 1 Thailand: 1 Tibet: 1 Dutch Indonesia: 1 Najd: 1 Oman: 1 Wait if central powers won ww1 then Japan is biggee |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2016 10:40:49 GMT
*bigger
|
|
