|
|
Post by STILETT0 on May 7, 2021 0:10:45 GMT
STILETT0 , I do think it would be quite interesting if you made China a third faction. 1975 is after the Sino-Soviet split I think. China is still anti-US, now anti-Soviet, and pro-Stalinist. China's alliance could include Albania, since Sino-Albanian friendship stuff. There is nothing called Stalinism. Stalin was a practitioner of the ideology of Marxism- Leninism which takes it’s philosophical doctrine from the philosopher Karl Marx and the practical doctrine from Bolshevik revolutionary Lenin. Lenin had good intentions-Stalin didn't. |
|
|
|
Post by STILETT0 on May 7, 2021 0:14:43 GMT
Charles Huntziger , I can probably guess that WTO would be Soviets and China, with NATO being everything else. Afghanistan could be WTO, since Soviet-Afghan war. Would be interesting if there was mujahedeen. Soviets/China will probably paraspam heavily to compensate. you mean NATO for Afghanistan, right? It is hard to add generals, but I'll see what I can do. 1975 will be quite easy with the sparsity of generals if I don't add them. Soviets/China also have The UAR which is a geopolitical giant, as well as Persia, and all of the other Balkan Powers (Ethiopia Too) Giving China and independent faction will make it one sided against the Chinese. The only allies they would have would be Greece, North Yemen, and Pakistan. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2021 1:00:49 GMT
There is nothing called Stalinism. Stalin was a practitioner of the ideology of Marxism- Leninism which takes it’s philosophical doctrine from the philosopher Karl Marx and the practical doctrine from Bolshevik revolutionary Lenin. Lenin had good intentions-Stalin didn't. Perfectly sums up the message of Animal Farm (I will say that it was the best explanation or presentation of Russian Revolution's characters) |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2021 1:03:36 GMT
Charles Huntziger, I can probably guess that WTO would be Soviets and China, with NATO being everything else. Afghanistan could be WTO, since Soviet-Afghan war. Would be interesting if there was mujahedeen. Soviets/China will probably paraspam heavily to compensate. You are saying to put Jammu-Kashmir, Pakistan and India on same side in an accurate mod. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2021 1:05:34 GMT
Charles Huntziger , I can probably guess that WTO would be Soviets and China, with NATO being everything else. Afghanistan could be WTO, since Soviet-Afghan war. Would be interesting if there was mujahedeen. Soviets/China will probably paraspam heavily to compensate. you mean NATO for Afghanistan, right? It is hard to add generals, but I'll see what I can do. 1975 will be quite easy with the sparsity of generals if I don't add them. Soviets/China also have The UAR which is a geopolitical giant, as well as Persia, and all of the other Balkan Powers (Ethiopia Too) Giving China and independent faction will make it one sided against the Chinese. The only allies they would have would be Greece, North Yemen, and Pakistan. You should put China on NATO side because of their closeness with USA that started in 70's when they realised that they cannot stand alone. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2021 1:11:23 GMT
What will be the Coilations? India-WTO UAR-WTO Ethiopia-WTO Persia-WTO PRC-WTO Nepal-WTO East Yemen-WTO Bulgaria-WTO Romania-WTO Soviet Union-WTO Mongolia-WTO UK-NATO Pakistan-NATO France-NATO Turkey-NATO US Proxy Armies-NATO Iran-NATO Somalia-NATO Israel-NATO Afghanistan-NATO Uyghur/Xinkiang-NATO Kashmir And Jammu-UNION India and Pakistan, I was never sure which allegiance to place them in, only that they should be in opposite allegiances. At this point, they are both NATO aligned, but there are so many little alliances and enemies. Just for the sake of simplicity, and not leaving the player claiming it is impossible with so many allegiances, I put them NATO and WTO. Persia and Iran Both? |
|
|
|
Post by Joseph Stalin on May 7, 2021 6:44:33 GMT
There is nothing called Stalinism. Stalin was a practitioner of the ideology of Marxism- Leninism which takes it’s philosophical doctrine from the philosopher Karl Marx and the practical doctrine from Bolshevik revolutionary Lenin. Lenin had good intentions-Stalin didn't. That’s an abstract topic and entirely depends on the perspective. Btw China would be on the side of Soviet Union,(or at least neutral) not USA. There was literally no way the Chineese soldiers would have fought for Americans. If I consider the world conquest mechanism of ET no china would mean an extra 20 turns for USSR to conquer Asia. France was not in NATO aswell. |
|
Hsueh Yueh
Captain
Yo! It's Hsueh-Yueh here, formerly known as Ismet Inonu. On a hiatus right now.
Posts: 125
|
Post by Hsueh Yueh on May 7, 2021 14:16:13 GMT
Both are NATO-aligned, so they would probably put that dispute aside in favor of being anti-Soviet. Charles Huntziger, |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2021 14:23:27 GMT
Both are NATO-aligned, so they would probably put that dispute aside in favor of being anti-Soviet. Charles Huntziger, Who both |
|
Hsueh Yueh
Captain
Yo! It's Hsueh-Yueh here, formerly known as Ismet Inonu. On a hiatus right now.
Posts: 125
|
Post by Hsueh Yueh on May 7, 2021 14:26:54 GMT
pakistan and india
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2021 14:29:03 GMT
Impossible, that wouldn't happen till Sun rises from east. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2021 14:30:40 GMT
Both are NATO-aligned, so they would probably put that dispute aside in favor of being anti-Soviet. Charles Huntziger, India was pro-Soviet and didn't liked the West very much. |
|
|
|
Post by STILETT0 on May 7, 2021 21:30:20 GMT
Both are NATO-aligned, so they would probably put that dispute aside in favor of being anti-Soviet. Charles Huntziger , India was pro-Soviet and didn't liked the West very much. Pakistan is NATO, India is WTO, K+J is Union. Happy? France will be NATO because this conquest is based around decolonization and the reveloutionary hotbed of the Middle East. I would've added Kurdistan and Nagorno-Karabakh, but there would be too many fronts, and they would have to both be in the same position as K+J. I was torn between India, because of Subayya Thimayya's friendliness with The West and the UN, and the people's overall dislike of the West. China will be WTO because this is more of a war of ideologies, and China is still mostly communist. They will just not be very coordinated with USSR and Pakistan, playing mostly defensive until mid-conquest. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2021 0:27:08 GMT
India was pro-Soviet and didn't liked the West very much. Pakistan is NATO, India is WTO, K+J is Union. Happy? France will be NATO because this conquest is based around decolonization and the reveloutionary hotbed of the Middle East. I would've added Kurdistan and Nagorno-Karabakh, but there would be too many fronts, and they would have to both be in the same position as K+J. I was torn between India, because of Subayya Thimayya's friendliness with The West and the UN, and the people's overall dislike of the West. China will be WTO because this is more of a war of ideologies, and China is still mostly communist. They will just not be very coordinated with USSR and Pakistan, playing mostly defensive until mid-conquest. Thimmaya do not have any executive power, he has no voice or influence in decisions. Once General Cariappa criticised Governments' policies, in return he was sent a notice whose summary was mind your own business, we will ours. Only major group which was pro-west was Swatantra Party which never got 50 seats in Parliament and faded away after C. Rajagopalachari's death. Diplomatically,Nehru was pro-Soviet, Shastri was pro-Soviet and Indira was pro-Soviet, so no one with any real power in Government was pro-west. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on May 12, 2021 7:45:52 GMT
Impossible, that wouldn't happen till Sun rises from east. The Sun does rises from the east  But Hsueh Yueh, your statement is absolutely, completly, ridiculously *inserts other appropriate words* wrong |
|
