|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 21, 2021 18:34:37 GMT
Who?
|
|
|
|
Best IAP?
Apr 22, 2021 18:56:46 GMT
via mobile
Post by Inactive user on Apr 22, 2021 18:56:46 GMT
IMO, they are all very good, especially when purchased in early game. Washington is somewhat more useful however. He has Four stars, compared tot genghis's 3 stars, and Napoleons artillery isn't suited for close combat. So i would conclude Washington is more useful. Also, Atilla is basically a lite version of genghis, so he isn't actually needed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 22, 2021 19:45:41 GMT
I vote John Marston, because he has OP attributes in Industrial, along with Perfect Artilleryman skills (IMO, Wshington's Defense Master isn't great for an Archer). Out of the Legendary replaceable skills, Napoleon has the best one (Explosives Master IMO is better than Formation Master, Assault Master, or Sniper Master). In Addition, he has legendary stats and Survivability, as well as starts with a 4* unit. |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Apr 23, 2021 10:38:17 GMT
I still have to give this to Washington. Simply because no one can really do what he does. His thing is that his combat parameters are just overtuned. damage bonus against everything other than artillery and walls and some of the highest attack in the game. And his survivability as an archer is just unparalleled. One of the only two archers that can lifesteal and the other one is really fragile. So he's probably the only archer that can stand up and facetank hordes of enemies. And unlike every other general that can do this, he has 1-2 range, so he'll counterattack a lot more. The trouble is that this is basically all he can do and that's not going to be that useful unless you build your team around it as basic enemies have like 2000+ HP later on in the game. Otherwise you'd just use Nobunaga who has almost as high damage but without the survivability (which you don't care about in non-ArchCom).
Napoleon is more or less just a super Bismarck with lifesteal. It's not bad to have extra stats and lifesteal, but there's not a lot of demand for extra artillery in most strategies and the overall increase in power from Napoleon is probably less than from Washington in ArchCom. The nice thing about him is that you don't necessarily have to build your team around him. So if you're playing multiple runs he'll probably make the cut in the endgame nearly 100% of the time whereas Washington doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Apr 26, 2021 7:07:40 GMT
I vote John Marston , because he has OP attributes in Industrial, along with Perfect Artilleryman skills (IMO, Wshington's Defense Master isn't great for an Archer). Out of the Legendary replaceable skills, Napoleon has the best one (Explosives Master IMO is better than Formation Master, Assault Master, or Sniper Master). In Addition, he has legendary stats and Survivability, as well as starts with a 4* unit. I lose to Washington? This is disgraceful |
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Apr 29, 2021 7:56:02 GMT
I vote John Marston , because he has OP attributes in Industrial, along with Perfect Artilleryman skills (IMO, Wshington's Defense Master isn't great for an Archer). Out of the Legendary replaceable skills, Napoleon has the best one (Explosives Master IMO is better than Formation Master, Assault Master, or Sniper Master). In Addition, he has legendary stats and Survivability, as well as starts with a 4* unit. I lose to Washington? This is disgraceful Yes, you do, your artillery just isn't that usefull in this game  |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Apr 29, 2021 9:50:12 GMT
I lose to Washington? This is disgraceful Yes, you do, your artillery just isn't that usefull in this game My artillery isn't good in any game except EW6 1804 |
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Apr 29, 2021 9:55:12 GMT
My artillery isn't good in any game except EW6 1804 Sadly, it indeed isn't.  Your artillery could be good in EW6 1914, but your not in the game. Also, you were a total beast in real life, so i don't like the way you're portrayed in the games. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Apr 29, 2021 9:56:40 GMT
My artillery isn't good in any game except EW6 1804 Sadly, it indeed isn't. Your artillery could be good in EW6 1914, but your not in the game. Also, you were a total beast in real life, so i don't like the way you're portrayed in the games. Me too. It looks like they wanted to make me OP in games, but failed miserably. Even in my own game I am rated poor. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2021 9:57:35 GMT
I have bought all three. But like the majority I would say Washington is best iap
|
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Apr 29, 2021 9:59:25 GMT
Sadly, it indeed isn't. Your artillery could be good in EW6 1914, but your not in the game. Also, you were a total beast in real life, so i don't like the way you're portrayed in the games. Me too. It looks like they wanted to make me OP in games, but failed miserably. Even in my own game I am rated poor. Yeah, you can easily be replaced by princesses |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 29, 2021 12:54:25 GMT
I lose to Washington? This is disgraceful Yes, you do, your artillery just isn't that usefull in this game Artillery is my fave unit?  |
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Apr 29, 2021 13:16:46 GMT
Artillery is my fave unit? Yea, but it's only usefull to siege cities, otherwise it sucks. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Apr 29, 2021 13:26:07 GMT
Artillery is my fave unit? Yea, but it's only usefull to siege cities, otherwise it sucks. Cries in Li Shimin. He did a very strong amount (purple inf) to non-city units. |
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Apr 29, 2021 13:27:36 GMT
Yea, but it's only usefull to siege cities, otherwise it sucks. Cries in Li Shimin. He did a very strong amount (purple inf) to non-city units. Yes, but he is REALLY expensive at 3000 medals. Could be that he is powerful, i never bought him cause he was too expensive. |
|
Your artillery could be good in EW6 1914, but your not in the game. Also, you were a total beast in real life, so i don't like the way you're portrayed in the games.
