|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Feb 10, 2016 17:51:19 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Feb 10, 2016 17:52:26 GMT
I agree this war a bit OP but guys look: Germany has just defeated France which costed 4 years. Why would Estonia cost 3 years? I mean it is so small as f.
|
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Feb 10, 2016 17:54:26 GMT
Estonian cities are hereby replaced by South African Union cities: Johannesburg, Durban, Capetown. However in return for this I demand Estonia to stop all attacks for 3 years. Do you agree The Light Bringer I change the attack on Estonia for South-African cities in change of 3 years peace? |
|
|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Feb 10, 2016 17:55:46 GMT
I agree this war a bit OP but guys look: Germany has just defeated France which costed 4 years. Why would Estonia cost 3 years? I mean it is so small as f. Because it's not fair to Oskar to take one vassal of yours (this isn't the unfair part, it's comin) then be completely butt (insert curse) in a single phase. |
|
|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Feb 10, 2016 17:56:13 GMT
The new turns are approved by Bismarck.
|
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Feb 10, 2016 17:58:26 GMT
Von Bismarck jr Sorry but the attack of The Light Bringer was of the same strategic brilliance to attack Germany in 1940 as Switzerland. I mean I am the most powerful nation and one paint spoil on the map decides to get more color on the map, fine, but look at it realistically what would happen. I made The Light Bringer a very generous offer but he has to remember Estonia can not just win from Germany, even if he builds 8 armies it is IMPOSSIBLE.
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Feb 10, 2016 18:00:16 GMT
I agree this war a bit OP but guys look: Germany has just defeated France which costed 4 years. Why would Estonia cost 3 years? I mean it is so small as f. don't insult Estonia please even if joking, that's number one Number two, now how can you take South Africa? |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Feb 10, 2016 18:01:23 GMT
Von Bismarck jr Sorry but the attack of The Light Bringer was of the same strategic brilliance to attack Germany in 1940 as Switzerland. I mean I am the most powerful nation and one paint spoil on the map decides to get more color on the map, fine, but look at it realistically what would happen. I made The Light Bringer a very generous offer but he has to remember Estonia can not just win from Germany, even if he builds 8 armies it is IMPOSSIBLE. it can if it gets backup, you are on the other hand aren't getting any backup |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2016 18:06:14 GMT
Estonian cities are hereby replaced by South African Union cities: Johannesburg, Durban, Capetown. However in return for this I demand Estonia to stop all attacks for 3 years. Do you agree The Light Bringer I change the attack on Estonia for South-African cities in change of 3 years peace? It shall be peace. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Feb 10, 2016 18:06:55 GMT
I mean, come on. One phase, and Estonia is gone "...Estonia is dead, period." Is that seriously a thing? Well you are neutral so very weak already, you attacked the strongest country, and then you expected no retaliation. I can't remember if I said something about a turn limit |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Feb 10, 2016 18:07:47 GMT
I mean, come on. One phase, and Estonia is gone "...Estonia is dead, period." Is that seriously a thing? don't you think that this is outta the op-ness limit? I mean you can go from East Prussia to the end of Baltic and its all fine?? Well if that's the case then I can easily take over ENTIRE Siberia because 1) no Russian army exists 2) the German and Bulgarian back up should be defeated by now considering that Oskar has fought alot in this area and I have also occupied Kazakhstan Bottom line----- this is tooooo much OP It's a non-player country so you need a minimum of 8 for everything |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Feb 10, 2016 18:10:22 GMT
Would like to request batten to end that stupid rule to research NAP's, its completely irrelevant, I mean we even have to research to sue for peace?
I just saw that in the techs thread
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Feb 10, 2016 18:21:46 GMT
Would like to request batten to end that stupid rule to research NAP's, its completely irrelevant, I mean we even have to research to sue for peace? I just saw that in the techs thread No. It's a tech. You have to research it. |
|
|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Feb 10, 2016 18:22:55 GMT
Would like to request batten to end that stupid rule to research NAP's, its completely irrelevant, I mean we even have to research to sue for peace? I just saw that in the techs thread Yeah, I think that was a little weird, too, but I don't mind. In civilization you have to research tech for Defensive Pacts and Alliances, so, eh. |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Feb 10, 2016 18:25:41 GMT
K then
|
|
