The More Randomer Area( for kurram random area 2)

I was studying finance to avoid writing an essay, then I went over here

I believe that now they believe that the mob did it because Robert Kennedy, his brother, had taken many actions against the mafia, who had a power grip over the country. Apparently, some people in prison confessed that the mob did do it, but I still think it was the sole action of Lee Harvey Oswald. I mean there is just so much evidence to support this imo. He had a previous history of supporting the Cubans following the revolution there, he was a known communist, had previously attempted to assassinate a well known politician who supported segregation, he lived in Soviet Russia for a few years, he had a rifle at his home and when the authorities came to his house following the assassination they found that the towel his wife said he kept his rifle in was NOT storing the rifle, he was found near the crime scene, and, when he assassinated Kennedy, he then shot a policeman and then went to the local movie theatre. Plus, just look at a picture of that guy and tell me he doesn't look slightly screwed up. These are my reasons and this is what i believe, but you van always have your own opinions as well.

Khurram

Well, that's interesting. I personally wear a tinfoil hat, so don't ask me for help

As a scientist I am very happy with a recent published paper in respect to this:

journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0147905

On the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs
David Robert Grimes

Conspiratorial ideation is the tendency of individuals to believe that events and power relations are secretly manipulated by certain clandestine groups and organisations. Many of these ostensibly explanatory conjectures are non-falsifiable, lacking in evidence or demonstrably false, yet public acceptance remains high. Efforts to convince the general public of the validity of medical and scientific findings can be hampered by such narratives, which can create the impression of doubt or disagreement in areas where the science is well established. Conversely, historical examples of exposed conspiracies do exist and it may be difficult for people to differentiate between reasonable and dubious assertions. In this work, we establish a simple mathematical model for conspiracies involving multiple actors with time, which yields failure probability for any given conspiracy. Parameters for the model are estimated from literature examples of known scandals, and the factors influencing conspiracy success and failure are explored. The model is also used to estimate the likelihood of claims from some commonly-held conspiratorial beliefs; these are namely that the moon-landings were faked, climate-change is a hoax, vaccination is dangerous and that a cure for cancer is being suppressed by vested interests. Simulations of these claims predict that intrinsic failure would be imminent even with the most generous estimates for the secret-keeping ability of active participants—the results of this model suggest that large conspiracies (≥1000 agents) quickly become untenable and prone to failure. The theory presented here might be useful in counteracting the potentially deleterious consequences of bogus and anti-science narratives, and examining the hypothetical conditions under which sustainable conspiracy might be possible.

Have a good one:)

wow, we even have a scientist!
The only other unique profession we have is a military historian ( Suvorov actually)

Well, as someone who spent a whole year of his life learning American history, there are some true facts. First off, it surely can't be can't be coincidence that Oswald did or had all of the things I've previously mentioned in the above post. I mean he supported the Cubans and lived in Soviet Russia for a few years and thats not slightly indicative? Nothing against Russians and Cubans, but, as an American, it was very...suspicious to do these kind of things. And also, I'm not saying the Russians or the Cubans told Oswald to shoot JFK, i think it was a lone wolf action, but the radical communist ideas he developed and his previous actions (attempted assassination of a different politician) is clear evidence pointing to that Oswald commenced the assassination alone. I could give more evidence, but i think you get my point.

Also, there was never a trial for Oswald not because there wasn't enough evidence for it, but because a civilian named Jack Ruby shot Oswald when he was leaving the police station he currently was in. Fun Fact btw, when Oswald got shot, he was going to be operated on in the same room that JFK was in before he died, but the nurses and doctors refused to work on him there, and had to move to another room. Oswald died from his wounds. Jack Ruby, after he killed Oswald, was sent to prison, but he was sent a large amount of mail thanking him for killing Oswald.