|
|
Post by Voltaire on Aug 10, 2021 3:51:58 GMT
219 - Why is 215 odd? I don't see anything wrong with it. *Another perspective  * 220 - LOL |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Aug 10, 2021 4:03:11 GMT
219 - Why is 215 odd? I don't see anything wrong with it. *Another perspective * 220 - LOL 221 - 15 minutes of loling...I mean laughing = 2 hours of sleep. |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Aug 10, 2021 6:02:18 GMT
221 - 15 minutes of loling...I mean laughing = 2 hours of sleep. 222 - "triple double" lmao. |
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Aug 10, 2021 6:22:03 GMT
221 - 15 minutes of loling...I mean laughing = 2 hours of sleep. 222 - "triple double" lmao. 223, a so called "angel number" |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Aug 10, 2021 6:23:15 GMT
222 - "triple double" lmao. 223, a so called "angel number" 224 - 2+2=4 |
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Aug 10, 2021 6:25:01 GMT
223, a so called "angel number" 224 - 2+2=4 225, the number you get when you multiply 5 by itself, and then multiply that number by 3^2 |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Aug 10, 2021 8:46:00 GMT
225, the number you get when you multiply 5 by itself, and then multiply that number by 3^2 226 is a happy number. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Aug 10, 2021 14:19:43 GMT
225, the number you get when you multiply 5 by itself, and then multiply that number by 3^2 226 is a happy number. 227 - *Sad 228 noises* |
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Aug 10, 2021 14:24:43 GMT
228, which is just about 158 more than the amount of roman emperors. |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Aug 10, 2021 14:26:44 GMT
228, which is just about 158 more than the amount of roman emperors. 229 - Amount? I didn't know Roman emperors were calculated in "Amounts"  |
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Aug 10, 2021 14:29:05 GMT
228, which is just about 158 more than the amount of roman emperors. 229 - Amount? I didn't know Roman emperors were calculated in "Amounts" 230 - yes yes, if i remember correctly there were about 70 roman emperors. So 228-70 equals 158 |
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Aug 10, 2021 14:31:13 GMT
229 - Amount? I didn't know Roman emperors were calculated in "Amounts" 230 - yes yes, if i remember correctly there were about 70 roman emperors. So 228-70 equals 158 231 - Ah you didn't get my point. The word "Amount" is usually used for monetary related things. Also, does this number include the Byzantine? |
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Aug 10, 2021 14:34:23 GMT
230 - yes yes, if i remember correctly there were about 70 roman emperors. So 228-70 equals 158 231 - Ah you didn't get my point. The word "Amount" is usually used for monetary related things. Also, does this number include the Byzantine? 232- a palyndrome (also no, this is counted till 476 and does not include Byzantine as far as I know (except if my teachers taught me wrong)) |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Aug 10, 2021 17:35:09 GMT
231 - Ah you didn't get my point. The word "Amount" is usually used for monetary related things. Also, does this number include the Byzantine? 232- a palyndrome (also no, this is counted till 476 and does not include Byzantine as far as I know (except if my teachers taught me wrong)) 233 - I'm too lazy to calculate is this a happy number. |
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Aug 10, 2021 18:07:57 GMT
232- a palyndrome (also no, this is counted till 476 and does not include Byzantine as far as I know (except if my teachers taught me wrong)) 233 - I'm too lazy to calculate is this a happy number. 234 -the hell is a happy number?  |
|
*
