|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Mar 20, 2016 21:31:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Mar 24, 2016 16:04:30 GMT
That is the dreadful part along with bases
|
|
|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Mar 24, 2016 22:10:06 GMT
I usually ignore and ion those dang bases.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Mar 26, 2016 15:52:19 GMT
I usually ignore and ion those dang bases. I hate it when I shoot at them with an ion and they have 1 health left and then take down one of my generals |
|
|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Apr 3, 2016 14:26:49 GMT
At least that did not happen to me.  |
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Apr 9, 2016 9:31:57 GMT
I have the ion cannon in level 13 |
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Apr 10, 2016 10:04:27 GMT
Does anyone know the best way to destroy bases without Ion?
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Apr 10, 2016 10:34:22 GMT
Does anyone know the best way to destroy bases without Ion? Nuke. |
|
|
|
Post by Amatsukaze on Apr 10, 2016 15:17:19 GMT
Does anyone know the best way to destroy bases without Ion? Nuke. Or maybe say how to deal with it when you start with a base right next to you and you not ready for nukes, say Japan? QwQ |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Apr 10, 2016 15:22:12 GMT
Or maybe say how to deal with it when you start with a base right next to you and you not ready for nukes, say Japan? QwQ Patton&Govorov. If 1975 Japan specific, I'll deploy Guderian on the super tank, and Govorov on the field artillery, take Yokohama first, then build a super tank in Osaka, put Patton on it, move him to Yokohama, Guderian and Govorov attack Tokyo, let Patton deal with the tower, after Tokyo is taken, nuke the tower, done. |
|
|
|
Post by Amatsukaze on Apr 10, 2016 15:27:54 GMT
Or maybe say how to deal with it when you start with a base right next to you and you not ready for nukes, say Japan? QwQ Patton&Govorov. If 1975 Japan specific, I'll deploy Guderian on the super tank, and Govorov on the field artillery, take Yokohama first, then build a super tank in Osaka, put Patton on it, move him to Yokohama, Guderian and Govorov attack Tokyo, let Patton deal with the tower, after Tokyo is taken, nuke the tower, done. Wow>w< I see the point for the way on taking back Tokyo, but for the base, why not a FA with General? |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Apr 10, 2016 15:34:08 GMT
Patton&Govorov. If 1975 Japan specific, I'll deploy Guderian on the super tank, and Govorov on the field artillery, take Yokohama first, then build a super tank in Osaka, put Patton on it, move him to Yokohama, Guderian and Govorov attack Tokyo, let Patton deal with the tower, after Tokyo is taken, nuke the tower, done. Wow>w< I see the point for the way on taking back Tokyo, but for the base, why not a FA with General? Why not? Because I think it is a better choice to let Govorov attack Tokyo instead of that base. Patton is a perfect one against alien bases because mostly the bases are very close to cities, Patton has Street Fighting and Explosive, he can deal with the bases better. Note, I just realized that Tokyo is close to Yokohama, so you can let Govorov and Guderian stand beside Tokyo, Patton stay in Yokohama and attack Tokyo together. |
|
|
|
Post by Amatsukaze on Apr 10, 2016 15:44:12 GMT
Wow>w< I see the point for the way on taking back Tokyo, but for the base, why not a FA with General? Why not? Because I think it is a better choice to let Govorov attack Tokyo instead of that base. Patton is a perfect one against alien bases because mostly the bases are very close to cities, Patton has Street Fighting and Explosive, he can deal with the bases better. Note, I just realized that Tokyo is close to Yokohama, so you can let Govorov and Guderian stand beside Tokyo, Patton stay in Yokohama and attack Tokyo together. I mean build a FA(or better RA?)for the base, of course Govorov should definitely go for Tokyo. I know the reason for using Patton in super tank now, though if any Artillery General having Street Fighting or Plain Fighting and Explosives, will it do the same theoretically?( ºΔº ) |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Apr 10, 2016 15:45:35 GMT
Why not? Because I think it is a better choice to let Govorov attack Tokyo instead of that base. Patton is a perfect one against alien bases because mostly the bases are very close to cities, Patton has Street Fighting and Explosive, he can deal with the bases better. Note, I just realized that Tokyo is close to Yokohama, so you can let Govorov and Guderian stand beside Tokyo, Patton stay in Yokohama and attack Tokyo together. I mean build a FA(or better RA?)for the base, of course Govorov should definitely go for Tokyo. I know the reason for using Patton in super tank now, though if any Artillery General having Street Fighting or Plain Fighting and Explosives, will it do the same theoretically?( ºΔº ) Of course they will. |
|
|
|
Post by Amatsukaze on Apr 10, 2016 15:46:47 GMT
I mean build a FA(or better RA?)for the base, of course Govorov should definitely go for Tokyo. I know the reason for using Patton in super tank now, though if any Artillery General having Street Fighting or Plain Fighting and Explosives, will it do the same theoretically?( ºΔº ) Of course they will. Nice, got them oWo |
|
