|
|
Post by Sorbet on Apr 29, 2016 13:58:33 GMT
FA=more damage and slightly tankier (I think), and RA=the ability to not get a retaliation strike. FA= ability to retaliate — stronger on defensive RA= not get retaliated — stronger when on offensive and he can fire from behind without getting fire on himself Plus, don't forget the splash damage. It adds quite a lot to RA's offensive power. |
|
|
|
Post by TK421 on Apr 29, 2016 14:02:09 GMT
Yeah, I guess. Never cared for it, though. Without a general on it, the RA splash really doesn't do much to the majority of enemies by itself. You need several strikes to really make it do that much damage.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 29, 2016 21:13:12 GMT
I mean what's the definition of the two FA: Field Artillery RA: Rocket Artillery Thanks, I know the difference just not the shortcut |
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Apr 30, 2016 3:16:23 GMT
Normally, I use FA for defensive purpose and RA only for my generals. For offensive, super tank all the way.
Against aliens, I use almost only RA. I have no problem with RA's inability to retaliate because alien behavior can be easily predicted so my RAs are rarely attacked. FA is used only for defending city.
|
|
|
|
Post by Singlemalt on Apr 30, 2016 4:31:32 GMT
Normally, I use FA for defensive purpose and RA only for my generals. For offensive, super tank all the way. Against aliens, I use almost only RA. I have no problem with RA's inability to retaliate because alien behavior can be easily predicted so my RAs are rarely attacked. FA is used only for defending city. Same here! |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on May 1, 2016 15:49:25 GMT
Normally, I use FA for defensive purpose and RA only for my generals. For offensive, super tank all the way. Against aliens, I use almost only RA. I have no problem with RA's inability to retaliate because alien behavior can be easily predicted so my RAs are rarely attacked. FA is used only for defending city. Against humans I feel like the RA is even better because human enemies (especially in Europe) are very close together damaging all of them. |
|
|
|
Post by dutchguy123 on May 11, 2016 15:28:54 GMT
Not a fan of him. I think he was a super nazi Guderian was not a super nazi! A. He had constant arguments with Hitler B. If he was a loyal Nazi he would have died with Hitler in his bunker in the battle of Berlin.
Guderian got fired when the attack on moscow failed, he almost conmitted to do an assasination on Hitler |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on May 12, 2016 1:48:21 GMT
I think he meant Erich von Manstein who never directly ordered to shoot Jews for example (even though his units did) and who was both Hitler's greatest debater and greatest general |
|
|
|
Post by kanue on May 13, 2016 7:02:28 GMT
"Certainly an exceptionally clever fellow, with great operational gifts, but I don't trust him," Hitler remarked after Von Manstein had left.
Frieser, K-H (2005). The Blitzkrieg Legend (English trans. ed.). Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-59114-294-6.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on May 14, 2016 13:43:56 GMT
"Certainly an exceptionally clever fellow, with great operational gifts, but I don't trust him," Hitler remarked after Von Manstein had left. Frieser, K-H (2005). The Blitzkrieg Legend (English trans. ed.). Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-59114-294-6. You will see that a lot between Hitler and Manstein. Manstein's plans for Stalingrad or Kharkov for example |
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Willis on May 24, 2016 15:57:26 GMT
Govorov is the best arty general in game Ikr he must be the best ... Plain fighting and cheap these stats make him awesome |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 24, 2016 16:37:26 GMT
Govorov is the best arty general in game Ikr he must be the best ... Plain fighting and cheap these stats make him awesome is no doubt the best artillery.  |
|
|
|
Post by dutchguy123 on May 24, 2016 17:20:37 GMT
Ikr he must be the best ... Plain fighting and cheap these stats make him awesome is no doubt the best artillery. Agree, I am still waiting for sale to come, then I can buy him |
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Willis on May 25, 2016 4:00:24 GMT
THE ATTACK ON MOSCOW FAILED BECUASE HITLER DELAYED IT GUDERIAN was known as fast Heinz and believed that armour forces should never be divided BECUASE you just can flank armoured forced with other armoured forces Hitler delayed the battle by atleast 7 months which lead to the defeat they would have won and also the panzer formations weren't proper if they had made the formations by referring to guderian book achtung-panzer! They violated 3 major rules that led to the loss guderian was an amazing gen he unlike manstein knew how to shoot aim and drive a panzer and had personal experiences at war he but guderian's story is not very sad the story of Erwin Rommel is too sad |
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Willis on May 25, 2016 4:01:01 GMT
THE ATTACK ON MOSCOW FAILED BECUASE HITLER DELAYED IT GUDERIAN was known as fast Heinz and believed that armour forces should never be divided BECUASE you just can flank armoured forced with other armoured forces Hitler delayed the battle by atleast 7 months which lead to the defeat they would have won and also the panzer formations weren't proper if they had made the formations by referring to guderian book achtung-panzer! They violated 3 major rules that led to the loss guderian was an amazing gen he unlike manstein knew how to shoot aim and drive a panzer and had personal experiences at war he but guderian's story is not very sad the story of Erwin Rommel is too sad Also Heinz guderian and kluge had constant fights |
|
