|
Post by Indonesia on Aug 11, 2021 13:44:16 GMT
I wonder why everyone forgot the day, were 5 and 2 days ago it was. remember this bruh.
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Aug 11, 2021 19:08:14 GMT
I wonder why everyone forgot the day, were 5 and 2 days ago it was. remember this bruh. I'd like to forget this terrible day, caused by MaximusOptimus
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Aug 11, 2021 20:33:05 GMT
I wonder why everyone forgot the day, were 5 and 2 days ago it was. remember this bruh. I'd like to forget this terrible day, caused by MaximusOptimus One of the worst days in history, and one of the best. An apocalyptic weapon, and an amazing force for peace.
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Aug 12, 2021 3:13:39 GMT
Well, be glad that MaximusOptimus is keeping peace here or we might have surely seen WW3 and would have been close to WW4 probably.
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Aug 12, 2021 6:12:59 GMT
Well, be glad that MaximusOptimus is keeping peace here or we might have surely seen WW3 and would have been close to WW4 probably. It's sad that we need weapons of absolute mass destruction before we find peace.
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Aug 12, 2021 8:04:24 GMT
Well, be glad that MaximusOptimus is keeping peace here or we might have surely seen WW3 and would have been close to WW4 probably. It's sad that we need weapons of absolute mass destruction before we find peace. Think it as a sign of evolution
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Aug 12, 2021 10:12:34 GMT
It's sad that we need weapons of absolute mass destruction before we find peace. Think it as a sign of evolution How is it evolution??
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Aug 12, 2021 10:15:33 GMT
Think it as a sign of evolution How is it evolution?? We have become so advanced, that we unlocked Nuclear technology and use it to police the others. Great right?
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Aug 12, 2021 10:17:43 GMT
We have become so advanced, that we unlocked Nuclear technology and use it to police the others. Great right? No. IMO, nuclear weapons shouldn't HAVE to be used to patrol others.
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Aug 12, 2021 10:21:57 GMT
We have become so advanced, that we unlocked Nuclear technology and use it to police the others. Great right? No. IMO, nuclear weapons shouldn't HAVE to be used to patrol others. But I can't find any other great deterrent which prevents the great powers from going to war, especially as strong as Nuclear missiles.
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Aug 12, 2021 10:23:49 GMT
No. IMO, nuclear weapons shouldn't HAVE to be used to patrol others. But I can't find any other great deterrent which prevents the great powers from going to war, especially as strong as Nuclear missiles. THERE SHOULD NOT BE ANY DETTERRENT NEEDED.
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Aug 12, 2021 10:27:51 GMT
But I can't find any other great deterrent which prevents the great powers from going to war, especially as strong as Nuclear missiles. THERE SHOULD NOT BE ANY DETTERRENT NEEDED. Well, I can easily claim that the sole reason why there hasn't been a World War since 1945 is because Nuclear Weapons. If you observe the wars after 1945, most of them were fought where one side didn't have nuclear weapons (Not taking indirect allies like USA or USSR during the proxy wars of the Cold war era). Before 1945, almost all powers had huge military strength, but not big enough to act as a deterrent, especially like Nuclear Weapons.
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Aug 12, 2021 10:35:31 GMT
THERE SHOULD NOT BE ANY DETTERRENT NEEDED. Well, I can easily claim that the sole reason why there hasn't been a World War since 1945 is because Nuclear Weapons. If you observe the wars after 1945, most of them were fought where one side didn't have nuclear weapons (Not taking indirect allies like USA or USSR during the proxy wars of the Cold war era). Before 1945, almost all powers had huge military strength, but not big enough to act as a deterrent, especially like Nuclear Weapons. That is besider the point. The nuclear weapons work well as a deterrent, but the deterrent shouldn't be needed to maintain peace. You humans only understand one language, and that is force.
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Aug 12, 2021 10:41:52 GMT
Well, I can easily claim that the sole reason why there hasn't been a World War since 1945 is because Nuclear Weapons. If you observe the wars after 1945, most of them were fought where one side didn't have nuclear weapons (Not taking indirect allies like USA or USSR during the proxy wars of the Cold war era). Before 1945, almost all powers had huge military strength, but not big enough to act as a deterrent, especially like Nuclear Weapons. That is besider the point. The nuclear weapons work well as a deterrent, but the deterrent shouldn't be needed to maintain peace. You humans only understand one language, and that is force.Oh no, Aliens have infiltrated!!! AAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!! It's just human tendency to have more of everything or gain attention. Those were the main reasons for war if you look closely. Your no deterrent point is like there is not a need of government to control a country. Or, putting it in another way, allowing you and your enemy (Brother? ) to find endlessly.
|
|
|
Post by Inactive user on Aug 12, 2021 10:47:41 GMT
That is besider the point. The nuclear weapons work well as a deterrent, but the deterrent shouldn't be needed to maintain peace. You humans only understand one language, and that is force.Oh no, Aliens have infiltrated!!! AAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!! It's just human tendency to have more of everything or gain attention. Those were the main reasons for war if you look closely. Your no deterrent point is like there is not a need of government to control a country. Or, putting it in another way, allowing you and your enemy (Brother? ) to find endlessly. There is need for a governement, but only to protect the people's interests and to defend them. They should not interfere with the people's lives. People should be able to do good out of free will, not because they are being threatened
|
|