|
|
Post by Eugene V. Debs on Sept 23, 2021 14:26:44 GMT
I'm sorry, but I think the Comintern moves in the last few pages are invalid because the rules was violated.  1. My lands were occupied without waiting for my reaction. Besides, I said I'd be offline. This is against this rule from Gentleman Agreement: "if the person is offline, try to not invade them 5 times" Also, you didn't expect my reaction. You invaded my lands without waiting for my reaction, without waiting for my move. This is against the rules. 2. And you fought only USA on my land. Don't I have my own army in my land? How can you invade my lands without knowing how many soldiers I have there and fighting them? You can't. This is OP. 3. Also, you can't occupy an entire country in one post. But you violated this rule. Quote: "don't invade a full country in one go but rather try to go by region (ex: instead of invading Germany in one go, try invading the Saarland, then the Rhineland, followed by Hessen ect..)" 4. Also, I said that I will be offline. Why did you continue to attack despite this? Yes, we may not be active at the same time. And there is no need for that. You just make your attack, say your troop count, and wait for the answer. Responds to you when the person you are attacking is online. And you reply when you are online. RP goes like this. But how do I lose multiple countries in Africa? So, I'm sorry, but I think the Comintern's moves are invalid. And I'm not angry, I'm sorry if that sounds like it. I just said my objection to one issue. |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Sept 23, 2021 14:30:39 GMT
Bulgarian panzer groups enters Central Africa, Congo(complex) showed their interest to join with Bulgaria as our ideologies are same😁 Let's focus on France when Eugene V. Debs is offline. I agree, Eugene V. Debs. |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Sept 23, 2021 14:31:48 GMT
l think there should be a time limit on switching factions, cause I have no idea how turns work in this game lol. like if you wanted to change to the enemy, you have to declare neutrality, and you can only switch factions the next day or something But that wouldn't remove the threat of betrayal. This could lead to a 5 vs 1 situation that is not fun nor what atleast I want from an RP. |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Nihilus on Sept 23, 2021 14:35:47 GMT
But that wouldn't remove the threat of betrayal. This could lead to a 5 vs 1 situation that is not fun nor what atleast I want from an RP. Yeah. Maybe a hard cap on the number of countries per faction, or countries in a certain area per faction could work. Or I guess we'd need a mod to do balancing or something, but that's a long-term-commitment that I don't think a lot of people want to do |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Sept 23, 2021 14:41:11 GMT
But that wouldn't remove the threat of betrayal. This could lead to a 5 vs 1 situation that is not fun nor what atleast I want from an RP. Yeah. Maybe a hard cap on the number of countries per faction, or countries in a certain area per faction could work. Or I guess we'd need a mod to do balancing or something, but that's a long-term-commitment that I don't think a lot of people want to do We do have the RP Executive Officers ( John Marston and Don Quixote de la Mancha), but they haven't been too active lately. |
|
|
|
Post by Captain on Sept 23, 2021 14:44:12 GMT
No, just a friendly reminder.
Actually I thought that how I am leading in Africa is out of the RP's rule so you just mentioned it
Ok all doubts clear
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain on Sept 23, 2021 15:42:00 GMT
Yeah, that's true and Captain is advancing too fast in Africa. But on the betrayal: 1. My perception was that all alliances kind of were reset, when we turned this to a normal RP, but that's just my perception. 2. I suggested that betrayal is prohibited and now I'm betrayed 1. Without anybody saying they disagree with the betrayal rule. 2. Because no one disagreed, I had no idea China would betray and I was totally unprepared. You're right, and yes, no one objected. Also maybe we should have continued in a new thread or we should added the rules to the first post. nochbv joined the game later and maybe didn't see the rules. Is this thread really going to close?? Ughh, is it necessary? |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Nihilus on Sept 23, 2021 16:13:15 GMT
Is this thread really going to close?? Ughh, is it necessary? I mean, it's 58 pages long, which I think is kinda really long. |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Sept 23, 2021 16:16:20 GMT
Maybe we have to start a new RP with fixed sides and only little neutrals. How about 1942?
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain on Sept 23, 2021 16:34:28 GMT
Maybe we have to start a new RP with fixed sides and only little neutrals. How about 1942? Since it will be 1942,you may add AZAD HIND FAUZ, a group led by Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, though it failed due to the accident... This force will originate in india against the British in an intent to free India |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Sept 23, 2021 16:38:27 GMT
Maybe we have to start a new RP with fixed sides and only little neutrals. How about 1942? Since it will be 1942,you may add AZAD HIND FAUZ, a group led by Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, though it failed due to the accident... This force will originate in india against the British in an intent to free India Calm down, that was just a suggestion. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene V. Debs on Sept 23, 2021 16:45:41 GMT
Maybe we have to start a new RP with fixed sides and only little neutrals. How about 1942? Yes, I agree. But Army Group or some other system? And which front, the whole world? |
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Sept 23, 2021 16:55:43 GMT
Maybe we have to start a new RP with fixed sides and only little neutrals. How about 1942? Yes, I agree. But Army Group or some other system? And which front, the whole world? I don't know. Maybe whole world and normal system, but sides fixed. But that's just speculation. Maybe there would be like 4 Soviet Fronts and 4 German Fronts and others would be the while country? |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Nihilus on Sept 23, 2021 17:02:25 GMT
Yes, I agree. But Army Group or some other system? And which front, the whole world? I don't know. Maybe whole world and normal system, but sides fixed. But that's just speculation. Maybe there would be like 4 Soviet Fronts and 4 German Fronts and others would be the while country? I think we should also include a map that updates as the RP goes along so people can keep track of stuff, as well as army statistics (just simple stuff like how many soldiers there are if they haven't been kept secret and where they are) |
|
|
|
Post by Captain on Sept 23, 2021 17:04:56 GMT
Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov and to all other members present in this event already a new thread is going to start so I have an idea As in this thread each member is playing as a respective nation, so now let's play different Now each nation have at least two members, I mean.. ex. In Germany one member will be the leader (he will decide and order it's troop) and in addition it may have one more member as minister in chief or assistant of the leader(he will give idea his leader in the event and may order troops in leader's absence)who will be the second most powerful person after the leader Give a Like if you like the idea or comment
|
|
