|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Dec 10, 2021 21:59:45 GMT
I would say women are more narrative based in thinking. This is because of the fact that women take care of children and keep the social cohesion in the group while the men go and hunt, that's why women evolved to have a much deeper form of empathy than men. Of course, this does not mean that all women are more empathic, but rather it's more than likely that a woman would be a lot more empathic than men. Stories and the like resonate much more in women, and that makes women better in handling individuals and groups. Basically natural diplomats. Men, on the other hand, developed a different line of thinking. Their empathy is much more distant,as you don't want to feel emotions when hunting prey. Imagine a hunter feeling bad and not able to throw his spear on the deer or boar. This makes men much more "rational", although i'd argue the proper term is information based. This makes men naturally good at leading and tactics. Of course, as a human being, our goal is to push those limitations and improve ourselves. Women should learn to be more cold and distant, as the problem is that they can get too caught up with feelings and emotions. Men, on the other hand,ought to learn to use emotions as a weapon: knowing how one feels deeply can give key information in how one thinks. This was one mistake Napoleon had: he did not try to empathize with the plight of the germans and Austrians, and rather gave them harsh terms rather than generous ones to heal the wounds. The goal of humanity is to try and understand where those stereotypes came from, to accept the truths in them, and use our rational brains to mold a society and culture which goal is to improve and improve. It's quite dumb to simply accept our limitations, and it's also quite dumb to glorify them. Anyway, i got caught up with the feels. John Marston, i would say in general,women might not find them interesting simply based on how they are presented in school. I bet you, that if history was presented from a PoV of a soldier from that era, or a peasant or king, their plights and hardships, then women would love history. The thing is, how can you prove men have been the ones who hunt?
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Dec 10, 2021 22:06:29 GMT
Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov, how our society and culture changed was based on our psychology, which is based on some evolutionary "quirks" that we have. That's why studying psychology, especially evolutionary psychology,would be really important in determining how a lot of us think, and how we could change society and culture. I shall use my knowledge to make people bend the knee, and shall live as the god empress for life.Aside from Carl Jung who i think is an absolute legend, Milton Erickson is someone i encourage people to read on. Guy was so good in reading body language i always wondered if the C.I.A secretly took notes or even asked it directly from him or his students. Society is a result of culture, without culture there is no society. Culture is a result of our ability to make collective imaginations, so yes, society and culture are a result of psychology, but it is also very much the opposite. Culture and society have a huge impact on our psychology and how we think, we should study and underdtand all three of them to underdtand the human mind, which won't understand though.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2021 4:37:15 GMT
Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov, we kinda understand human psychology actually, quite well. The problem is mostly the validity of some them, as it's hard to get accurate or rather, accepted social science papers that conform to the research etiquette and/or researches that could be replicated. It's hard to replicate studies,even harder to replicate studies that takes a lot of time and nuance to perform them. There are a ton of literature on psychology, and it's hard to navigate without falling for some bias. I would say this tho: the human psychology is extremely flawed, and it is really easy to manipulate as long as 1 conditions is met: the person you target does not know your intention. This is due to some hardwired instincts in our brain that we cannot do away. Which is why i always encourage people to improve their knowledge on psychology, politics and history to avoid being the next sucker, or worse. Knowledge is our only antidote to manipulation, and willingness to pick which manipulation is beneficial and which is not.
|
|
|
Post by thethethe08 on Dec 12, 2021 8:38:36 GMT
G - uys I - n R - eal L - ife Checkmate
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2022 23:28:03 GMT
Have you gone? / anybody know about deleted?
|
|
|
Post by John Marston on Jan 11, 2022 3:36:18 GMT
Have you gone? / anybody know about deleted? Not sure, maybe Deleted must be suffering another bout of mood swings and somehow managed to rack up lots of incomplete work which managed to eat him/her maybe?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2022 3:40:05 GMT
Yeaaaa maybe
|
|
Cecile
Captain
IN RAGE
Posts: 79
|
Post by Cecile on Jan 13, 2022 19:22:44 GMT
COME BACK DELETED AND TALK WITH MEEEE
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jan 13, 2022 19:38:35 GMT
Going for round 3?
|
|
Cecile
Captain
IN RAGE
Posts: 79
|
Post by Cecile on Jan 13, 2022 19:41:52 GMT
I guess
|
|
|
Post by STILETT0 on Jan 15, 2022 18:27:43 GMT
wat i thought deleted was a girl R E E E E E E E I mean, i never denied i was. But since it was called to question,and there's no way for me to prove it without showing private info, all i can do is just say i might be :D. But then again, there's the wise saying: " girls don't exist on the internet." based
|
|